Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 219597 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#70634 Jan 12, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Take a look at this:
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/04/05/jews
It's more like politics. Politicians are Pro-Israel. Nothing to do with Jesus.

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Level 5

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#70635 Jan 12, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? Is it natural process or does one have to take hormone shots?
Well, he's a medical researcher, so he's looking at how certain drugs affect eggs and fertility. So far, he hasn't found anything. Sucks to be him.

However, if you're doing the whole test tube thing, and you're a woman, there's lots of injections required.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#70636 Jan 12, 2013
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, he's a medical researcher, so he's looking at how certain drugs affect eggs and fertility. So far, he hasn't found anything. Sucks to be him.
That would be an interesting subject as I studied pharmacology. lol
Are you talking about narcotics or prescription drugs?

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#70637 Jan 12, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
It's more like politics. Politicians are Pro-Israel. Nothing to do with Jesus.
The land of Israel presently, is a testimony of Jesus existence and the biblical stories.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#70638 Jan 12, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> The land of Israel presently, is a testimony of Jesus existence and the biblical stories.
Watch the videos on you tube called "Ring of Power"

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Level 5

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#70639 Jan 12, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
That would be an interesting subject as I studied pharmacology. lol
Are you talking about narcotics or prescription drugs?
Prescription. No, I don't know the drugs, sorry. He's just trying to demonstrate that some new drug and method can increase fertility. Unfortunately for him, his results were negative. I personally think that's great, it needs to be published, too, but he's not happy and is just running more tests...

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#70640 Jan 12, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Watch the videos on you tube called "Ring of Power"
We have so many videos in the world, some are true while some are false.
I don't see any politics in that land called Israel,
because it was initially a non arable land, until the Jews did their home work.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#70641 Jan 12, 2013
The land of Israel is a land with little or no importance until the Jews transformed it.
anonymous

Chagrin Falls, OH

#70642 Jan 12, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> The land of Israel presently, is a testimony of Jesus existence and the biblical stories.
To Date!!

Who let you back on the public library system anyway? Aren't you on some kind of quest for the Lady of the Lake or something? You should head on over to Israel. It's to the east. You can't miss it.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#70643 Jan 12, 2013
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>To Date!!
Who let you back on the public library system anyway? Aren't you on some kind of quest for the Lady of the Lake or something? You should head on over to Israel. It's to the east. You can't miss it.
You don't have an idea of what you are talking about.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#70645 Jan 12, 2013
Of course, people who try to hijack threads for purposes other than the topic of the thread are certainly acting in an anti-social way, don't you think?
Cybele wrote:
You are giving a different meaning to anti-social
Different in what way?

***

Don't you think it takes judgment to determine if someone else's argument is illogical and contains logical fallacies?
Cybele wrote:
No you are not using your 'own' judgement but following a set of rules for logical arguments.
How would one go about determining *how* the rules apply without using judgment?
Cybele wrote:
We can't apply those set of rules in every type of argument.
Why not?

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#70646 Jan 12, 2013
Drew Smith wrote:
Of course, people who try to hijack threads for purposes other than the topic of the thread are certainly acting in an anti-social way, don't you think?
<quoted text>
Different in what way?
***
Don't you think it takes judgment to determine if someone else's argument is illogical and contains logical fallacies?
<quoted text>
How would one go about determining *how* the rules apply without using judgment?
<quoted text>
Why not?
First of all, not all arguments are formal, so certain rules don't apply. If you think you are using judgement by pointing out fallacies, it's not really your own. You're just identifying them.

definition of judgement:

"the forming of an opinion, estimate, notion, or conclusion, as from circumstances presented to the mind."

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Indianapolis, IN

#70647 Jan 12, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually we will never run out of oil. It will just keep getting more and more expensive. It will eventually get priced off of the market. Though that will not happen for a while. As the price goes up and technology improves what used to be unretrievable will become economical. Even if oil cost $100.00 a gallon there are some uses of it that will still be of value. Driving a car probably will be not one of them at that point.
True enough. I took the cheap way out by using "run out" rather than a paragraph.

;-)

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#70648 Jan 12, 2013
Don't you think it takes judgment to determine if someone else's argument is illogical and contains logical fallacies?
<quoted text>
How would one go about determining *how* the rules apply without using judgment?
<quoted text>
Why not?
Cybele wrote:
First of all, not all arguments are formal, so certain rules don't apply.
Which rules don't apply, and why don't they?
Cybele wrote:
If you think you are using judgement by pointing out fallacies, it's not really your own. You're just identifying them.
definition of judgement:
"the forming of an opinion, estimate, notion, or conclusion, as from circumstances presented to the mind."
If you form an opinion that a person's argument fits into the category of a particular logical fallacy, how is that not judgment?

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#70649 Jan 12, 2013
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Which rules don't apply, and why don't they?
If someone meant to say something figuratively speaking and not literally then they are not fallacies. If someone's using sense of humor is another example.
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
If you form an opinion that a person's argument fits into the category of a particular logical fallacy, how is that not judgment?
I never said it wasn't. I said before that I usually use my 'own' sound judgement instead of pointing out fallacies.

Do you have a topic you want to talk about other than argue about arguments?

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#70651 Jan 12, 2013
Which rules don't apply, and why don't they?
Cybele wrote:
If someone meant to say something figuratively speaking and not literally then they are not fallacies. If someone's using sense of humor is another example.
Can you point to a posting I made where I applied a rule of logic when the other poster was clearly engaged in being figurative or humorous?

***

If you form an opinion that a person's argument fits into the category of a particular logical fallacy, how is that not judgment?
Cybele wrote:
I never said it wasn't.
You didn't claim that I wasn't using judgment when I formed an opinion that someone else's argument was using a logical fallacy?

***
Cybele wrote:
Do you have a topic you want to talk about other than argue about arguments?
Yes, let's talk about evolution vs. creationism, the actual topic of this thread. Where do you stand on that issue?

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#70652 Jan 12, 2013
Drew Smith wrote:
Of course, people who try to hijack threads for purposes other than the topic of the thread are certainly acting in an anti-social way, don't you think?
Then you don't know what anti-social really means

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#70653 Jan 12, 2013
Drew Smith wrote:
Which rules don't apply, and why don't they?
<quoted text>
Can you point to a posting I made where I applied a rule of logic when the other poster was clearly engaged in being figurative or humorous?
***
If you form an opinion that a person's argument fits into the category of a particular logical fallacy, how is that not judgment?
<quoted text>
You didn't claim that I wasn't using judgment when I formed an opinion that someone else's argument was using a logical fallacy?
***
<quoted text>
Yes, let's talk about evolution vs. creationism, the actual topic of this thread. Where do you stand on that issue?
Do you have a wheely in your head?

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#70654 Jan 12, 2013
Of course, people who try to hijack threads for purposes other than the topic of the thread are certainly acting in an anti-social way, don't you think?
Cybele wrote:
Then you don't know what anti-social really means
If the social norm is to see that a message board system, such as Topix, is intentionally organized into forums and threads in order to facilitate discussion about the topic of the thread, and a person acts antagonistically toward that social norm by attempting to divert discussion away from the topic of the thread and toward some personal pet topic, why wouldn't that qualify as being "anti-social"?

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#70655 Jan 12, 2013
Drew Smith wrote:
Of course, people who try to hijack threads for purposes other than the topic of the thread are certainly acting in an anti-social way, don't you think?
<quoted text>
If the social norm is to see that a message board system, such as Topix, is intentionally organized into forums and threads in order to facilitate discussion about the topic of the thread, and a person acts antagonistically toward that social norm by attempting to divert discussion away from the topic of the thread and toward some personal pet topic, why wouldn't that qualify as being "anti-social"?
Are you acting like a mod now? How is a discussion on a personal level anti-social? How is that damaging to others?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
One Word (Jan '09) 5 min -Papa-Smurf- 18,277
3 Word Advice (Good or Bad) (Dec '14) 5 min all my fault 5,017
What turns you on ? (Aug '11) 5 min Hippy Rick 2,310
Word Association. (Nov '10) 6 min -Papa-Smurf- 20,096
JUST SAY SOMETHING. Whatever comes to mind!! (Aug '09) 7 min all my fault 34,191
Word Association (Mar '10) 8 min -Papa-Smurf- 21,849
News Thousands of demonstrators protest Trump in Atl... 8 min Battle Tested 1,323
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 44 min LIM 71,175
Back In The Day ... for the third time! 2 hr Parden Pard 249
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 3 hr all my fault 211,404
A to Z songs by title or group! 5 hr liam cul8r 981
More from around the web