Evolution vs. Creation

Full story: Best of New Orleans

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.
Comments
66,301 - 66,320 of 112,972 Comments Last updated 4 hrs ago
Alien Outlaw

Beardstown, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70525
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Givemehumbleanyday wrote:
<quoted text>
That kind if DNA can go straight to the garbage bin labeled "TOXINS"...for the next dumpster pick up.
Why mankind can only DREAM about being "God"(s). They'll always screw something up.
To many galaxies to count/comprehend and still the primitive human animal talks about this guy that walked on water........WOW!!! And no, that "wow" was not a blimp on the SETI radar. The "contact" in human terms is no different than the religious beliefs of all humans.....a fantasy world!!!
Givemehumbleanyd ay

Somerset, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70526
Jan 10, 2013
 
Alien Outlaw wrote:
<quoted text>To many galaxies to count/comprehend and still the primitive human animal talks about this guy that walked on water........WOW!!! And no, that "wow" was not a blimp on the SETI radar. The "contact" in human terms is no different than the religious beliefs of all humans.....a fantasy world!!!
Tsk, petri dishes are real.
Duh.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70527
Jan 10, 2013
 
Seriously, WTF.

Level 5

Since: Apr 12

Taizhou, China

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70528
Jan 10, 2013
 
Cybele, what is your point in saying that animals of other species can't clone themselves?
That we have unique gifts, and therefore are God's chosen species, and therefore must have been created rather than evolved?
We have heard that line before.
Other species have unique gifts, too.
Cheetahs probably feel sorry for us because we can't swim as fast as they can.
Elephants probably feel sorry for us because we can't carry heavy logs with our noses.
Bombadier beetles probably feel sorry for us because we can't excrete toxins in an enemy's face.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70529
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Thomas Robertson wrote:
Cybele, what is your point in saying that animals of other species can't clone themselves?
That we have unique gifts, and therefore are God's chosen species, and therefore must have been created rather than evolved?
We have heard that line before.
Other species have unique gifts, too.
Cheetahs probably feel sorry for us because we can't swim as fast as they can.
Elephants probably feel sorry for us because we can't carry heavy logs with our noses.
Bombadier beetles probably feel sorry for us because we can't excrete toxins in an enemy's face.
No. I'm asking for evidence because I've never heard of any animal species that can clone itself other than single cell organisms through asexual reproduction. And now animal cloning has become synonymous to asexual propagation. Is human cloning considered an asexual reproduction?

My point is cloning is a process that humans invented with the use of technology. So how can animals like cows or sheep use this process naturally? Impossible.

Where are you going with your statement about animals? Did I ever mention anything that suggests that animals are inferior to humans?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70530
Jan 10, 2013
 
Christopher Keller wrote:
<quoted text>
A cloned human would be created for a specific purpose. A soldier. A basketball player. A musician.
For a given purpose by someone with power.
As a slave.
Sez who?

What you get is a baby.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70531
Jan 10, 2013
 
Christopher Keller wrote:
<quoted text>
A cloned human would be created for a specific purpose. A soldier. A basketball player. A musician.
For a given purpose by someone with power.
As a slave.
Then we should NOT clone humans. Many attempts in cloning result in failures and deformity, which is why it makes it unethical. No human cloning produced viable pregnancies. They lead to miscarriages. Considering the risks involved, why would one choose this method of reproduction?

Before we even think what a cloned human can do in our society, a soldier or athlete, we should first study how to perfect the cloning process.

You're mentality is influenced by sci-fi movies.

“ROCK ON ROCKERS!!”

Level 8

Since: Mar 11

Rockin' USA ;)

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70532
Jan 10, 2013
 
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Then we should NOT clone humans. Many attempts in cloning result in failures and deformity, which is why it makes it unethical. No human cloning produced viable pregnancies. They lead to miscarriages. Considering the risks involved, why would one choose this method of reproduction?
Before we even think what a cloned human can do in our society, a soldier or athlete, we should first study how to perfect the cloning process.
You're mentality is influenced by sci-fi movies.
. WHY would ANYONE want to CLONE anything? It's like creating ARTIFICIAL Flavors from the Original NATURAL Flavor?? The taste is NEVER exactly the same.. THERE is a slight difference.. BUT I just can't put my finger on it. That's WHY we were created by the Master Creator himself..to REPRODUCE!! Reminds me of the movie.. The Boys From Brazil..create a Master Race..FREAKIN' SCARY!!

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70533
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Colorado Chick wrote:
<quoted text>. WHY would ANYONE want to CLONE anything? It's like creating ARTIFICIAL Flavors from the Original NATURAL Flavor?? The taste is NEVER exactly the same.. THERE is a slight difference.. BUT I just can't put my finger on it. That's WHY we were created by the Master Creator himself..to REPRODUCE!! Reminds me of the movie.. The Boys From Brazil..create a Master Race..FREAKIN' SCARY!!
What if cloning is the future? Do you think in vitro is unethical? I don't see the difference other than the methods used.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70534
Jan 10, 2013
 
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Too many people have been watching too much bad sci-fi.
A human cloning gets you one human newborn. That is all.
No reason to treat it any differently from any other...
I can't figure out why people just can't tell the difference between fiction and reality still. It's scary.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70535
Jan 10, 2013
 
Colorado Chick wrote:
<quoted text>. WHY would ANYONE want to CLONE anything? It's like creating ARTIFICIAL Flavors from the Original NATURAL Flavor?? The taste is NEVER exactly the same.. THERE is a slight difference.. BUT I just can't put my finger on it. That's WHY we were created by the Master Creator himself..to REPRODUCE!! Reminds me of the movie.. The Boys From Brazil..create a Master Race..FREAKIN' SCARY!!
We weren't "created" anymore than a rock is "created" from lava.

Cloning organs will save lives.

Cloning animals would help feed people.

Cloning plants will help feed people.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70536
Jan 10, 2013
 
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Too many people have been watching too much bad sci-fi.
A human cloning gets you one human newborn. That is all.
No reason to treat it any differently from any other...
Except for spare parts....muwa-hahaha!

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70537
Jan 10, 2013
 
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Except for spare parts....muwa-hahaha!
If it could be made acephalic from the beginning....

O'course, by that point, we should be able to just grow the parts separately.

“You have blue shoes”

Level 5

Since: Mar 11

Please change them

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70538
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then their theories just confirmed my own conjectures! yay!
Yaaay!

What other theories would you like to "confirm" after the fact, with your own guesses?

“You have blue shoes”

Level 5

Since: Mar 11

Please change them

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70539
Jan 10, 2013
 
Christopher Keller wrote:
<quoted text>
A cloned human would be created for a specific purpose. A soldier. A basketball player. A musician.
For a given purpose by someone with power.
As a slave.
Or 'cause you're infertile and want kids.

“You have blue shoes”

Level 5

Since: Mar 11

Please change them

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70540
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
No. I'm asking for evidence because I've never heard of any animal species that can clone itself other than single cell organisms through asexual reproduction. And now animal cloning has become synonymous to asexual propagation. Is human cloning considered an asexual reproduction?
My point is cloning is a process that humans invented with the use of technology. So how can animals like cows or sheep use this process naturally? Impossible.
Where are you going with your statement about animals? Did I ever mention anything that suggests that animals are inferior to humans?
Well, you're mistaken. Lots of plants can create clones or sexually reproduce. They decide which to do based on the environmental conditions around them. In favorable conditions, clone. In poor conditions, sexually reproduce.

Some lizard species are 100% clones - no male offspring, only females. All daughters share 100% of their genes with their mother, minus mutation.

All identical twins are clones. There's about 8 primate species that only reproduce in twins - golden lion tamarins, for example.

I honestly wish people would learn more about biology before they make pretense to authoritative statements about it. It's just misleading behavior.

In case you're wondering, most social insects are not actually clones of each other.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70541
Jan 10, 2013
 
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Or 'cause you're infertile and want kids.
Good enough reason right there.

O'course, it's gonna play holy hell with criminal forensics.

“You have blue shoes”

Level 5

Since: Mar 11

Please change them

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70542
Jan 10, 2013
 
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Sez who?
What you get is a baby.
Totally! The first authorized human cloning will be for couples who cannot have kids, but want to.

I imagine some kind of "The Island" scenario as well, to be honest Although, it's more likely we'll figure out how to grow cloned material, perhaps even bodies, without brains to avoid ethical issues.

“You have blue shoes”

Level 5

Since: Mar 11

Please change them

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70543
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Good enough reason right there.
O'course, it's gonna play holy hell with criminal forensics.
I imagine, by that time, you'll be able to get a rough read from the DNA on how old the individual is based on teleomere length. Or perhaps we'll add some kind of 666 genetic marking

;)

Plus, the parent is probably going to have a good alibi or be too old to actually carry out a crime when the evil child commits the terrible crime.

“You have blue shoes”

Level 5

Since: Mar 11

Please change them

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70544
Jan 10, 2013
 
Cybele wrote:
Seriously, WTF.
inorite?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••