For example- what you just typed, actually VALIDATES, what I stated my own opinion to be prior-<quoted text>
Sagan didn't seem to think so...
“Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality."
(FACT, that MANY people can have a pocket Bible (or other categorically related type reading material) in one hand to enjoy reading from, AND(!!) a palm sized periodic table in the other to reference from, with NO PROBLEM whatsoever)
So in only using the presented statement from the person you referenced,it appears they might think right along the same lines. However, with out researching the subject referenced any myself, that just really constitutes just a third party assumption on my part, being based only on the statement you posted about another, so that assumption in no ways makes it any sort of "fact"... Just opinion upon assumption :-).