Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 209882 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#68458 Dec 29, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
With your logic, cops should be locking up corrupt politicians. who did you vote for if you don't mind me asking?
Cops should be locking up corrupt politicians, and the people who voted for them as well.

“Right click Left click Yay!”

Level 7

Since: Dec 10

Nehwon

#68459 Dec 29, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't say that science had any specific ethics, but that the scientific method is the best option for determining more sane and valid ethical behavior. The "golden rule" is anything but, as it also endorses inequality and evades responsibility, and it wasn't brought to us by religion, it's an innate logical conclusion which was an evolutionary benefit at the time. It's outdated, and we know that now because of the scientific method.
The scientific method wasn't developed for what we even use it for. Originally it was developed to weed out the scam "miracles," which the Catholic church claimed authority over, of course they have failed to find any genuine miracles, but what did you expect? We found it was beneficial in other areas of life, so we started applying the method to other areas of life, and it has never let us down as it leads us answers in all situations. You can thank religious skeptics for the great tool we have now, but they were, and are, still skeptics not blind followers of any sort.
"I didn't say that science had any specific ethics, but that the scientific method is the best option for determining more sane and valid ethical behavior."

So ethics derives from scientific endeavor? Not sure if I could agree with that. Science gives us more information to make a better judgement in a course of action.

But science is very much neutral in how that information is obtained. What we consider basic ethics in testing with humans invokes the Golden Rule.

Don't get me wrong here: the scientific methodology is an extraordinary tool to filter out the wannabe prophets of miracles for their profits.

I just don't want to see science seen as a religion and researchers become unquestioning cardinals of knowledge.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#68460 Dec 29, 2012
greymouser wrote:
<quoted text>
"I didn't say that science had any specific ethics, but that the scientific method is the best option for determining more sane and valid ethical behavior."
So ethics derives from scientific endeavor? Not sure if I could agree with that. Science gives us more information to make a better judgement in a course of action.
But science is very much neutral in how that information is obtained. What we consider basic ethics in testing with humans invokes the Golden Rule.
Don't get me wrong here: the scientific methodology is an extraordinary tool to filter out the wannabe prophets of miracles for their profits.
I just don't want to see science seen as a religion and researchers become unquestioning cardinals of knowledge.
Please do not tell me you are conflating science with an actual "entity" and the scientific method with some "law." The scientific method is a standard, a procedure, for weeding out fallacious claims of any sort, as for you "I don't want it see as a religion" part, well, it comes from a religious group who were attempting to do just that, weed out the fallacious claims. People use the scientific method a lot more than they ever realize, the more intelligent the person, the more often they use the method. When you look at the labels on the food products, consider the prices and quality, and compare them to other brands ... that is the scientific method. Since ethics itself is entirely subjective, morals are a made up canard, ethical behavior determined by just "feelings" has proven less than adequate in almost all instances, but ethical behavior with the scientific method applied has always been consistent and always progresses for the better. Ethics is not a religious thing, it's an evolutionary trait and nothing more. There is no magic involved, it's not some "spiritual" garbage, it's simply how you regard other humans, very mundane and probably the least interesting aspect of human behavior as a whole.

“Right click Left click Yay!”

Level 7

Since: Dec 10

Nehwon

#68461 Dec 29, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Please do not tell me you are conflating science with an actual "entity" and the scientific method with some "law." The scientific method is a standard, a procedure, for weeding out fallacious claims of any sort, as for you "I don't want it see as a religion" part, well, it comes from a religious group who were attempting to do just that, weed out the fallacious claims. People use the scientific method a lot more than they ever realize, the more intelligent the person, the more often they use the method. When you look at the labels on the food products, consider the prices and quality, and compare them to other brands ... that is the scientific method. Since ethics itself is entirely subjective, morals are a made up canard, ethical behavior determined by just "feelings" has proven less than adequate in almost all instances, but ethical behavior with the scientific method applied has always been consistent and always progresses for the better. Ethics is not a religious thing, it's an evolutionary trait and nothing more. There is no magic involved, it's not some "spiritual" garbage, it's simply how you regard other humans, very mundane and probably the least interesting aspect of human behavior as a whole.
So you have no problem with Dr. Mengele's research into twins or hypothermia on unwilling subjects?

Will you pull the "He's not a True Scotsman!" defense?

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#68462 Dec 29, 2012
greymouser wrote:
<quoted text>
So you have no problem with Dr. Mengele's research into twins or hypothermia on unwilling subjects?
Will you pull the "He's not a True Scotsman!" defense?
He was following unethical behavior. His motives were entirely his own, and his methods betray that. Had he followed the informed consensus of ethical behavior, the way scientists follow the informed consensus on many aspects of their research, he would have known those were unacceptable behaviors because they harm other people.

Are you going to throw out anymore red herrings or strawmen?
Richard Robles

Elmira, NY

#68463 Dec 29, 2012
The connecticut school shooter was an Atheist ... nuff said! The world would be a happier place without Islam and Atheism.

"Anders Behring Breivik was a practicing militant Darwinian Atheist racist. He believed secularism and science was the world's salvation, not Jesus Christ."

Anders Behring Breivik, Mass Murderer of Norway, was an Atheist Social Darwinist - NOT a Christian
http://cross.tv/69392

.
anonymous

Chagrin Falls, OH

#68465 Dec 29, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting. What amazes me more is how the ancient people acquired knowledge of what symbolic meanings animals have. For example the deer - power animal symbolizes gentleness, unconditional love, and kindness. The Celtics and Native Americans prayed to the deer to give them good hunt. Perhaps because of this practice ingrained in early human hunters and gatherers, we developed an instinctive ability from our own associations with these game animals. Animals behave purely on instincts. And many animals possess traits that humans wish to have such as better hearing, night vision, agility, etc. Whatever made humans distinct from animals that possessed the ability to decipher symbolic meanings in animals, probably led to intelligence and heightened sensory perception. But that's just how I see it. We are all connected.
Perhaps we are to some degree, but humans don't have the senses of animals, even if they seek to emulate them. Deer are a particularly bad example of a metaphor of the human psyche, although if I were to speculate, I'd say the primary reason is because the human persona is based on binocular vision, while deer are animals who watch on all sides and flee from conflicts. Even though humans are not predators by their evolutionary nature, they share more in common with them, psychologically.

Being bipedal is another break away from most animals at a fundamental level. I'd have to say, even if one was hard-wired similar to an animal, the differences in anatomy would be significant enough to produce very different personalities.
anonymous

Chagrin Falls, OH

#68466 Dec 29, 2012
Richard Robles wrote:
The connecticut school shooter was an Atheist ... nuff said! The world would be a happier place without Islam and Atheism.
"Anders Behring Breivik was a practicing militant Darwinian Atheist racist. He believed secularism and science was the world's salvation, not Jesus Christ."
Anders Behring Breivik, Mass Murderer of Norway, was an Atheist Social Darwinist - NOT a Christian
http://cross.tv/69392
.
The Spanish Inquisition were Christians. Nuff said!...and it seems that you're honest about your bigotry.
anonymous

Chagrin Falls, OH

#68467 Dec 29, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> That is a dis-honest response, you can not.
Well, Leela says you're a numbskull and I tend to trust her opinion.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#68468 Dec 29, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
Again, why did the Romans and Greeks adopted the false religion according to you guys?
For the same reason that they adopted the false religions of the Greek and Roman gods.
FREE SERVANT
#68469 Dec 29, 2012
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually in your case I'd call it UNbounded. Rationality requires boundaries. Otherwise one ends up like Mikey and being hit in the head and seeing images of Jesus in a meteorite as "evidence" of Jesus and not of brain damage.
OH BOY!!!! Hope you didn't get a lot of meteoric coal for Christmas***

“Keep the change...”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#68470 Dec 29, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Using the scientific method doesn't accurately help us assess what is objectively good or bad. What is good for one person can be bad for others. Unfortunately we can't avoid cultural bias. For example, some religions do not allow them to have blood transfusions even if it benefits them. They're willing to sacrifice their health to benefit their moral principles. And who's to say which is right or wrong, better or worse?
Objectivity has its own merits but impossible to apply without a universal system to allow it. And that what limits reality because each of us see reality differently. We are a diverse population. We are not clones of each other.
Even in the scientific community, for instance, there are competing theories for a given subject no matter each theory has attempted to use the scientific method.
So goodluck with that.
(Wow...I haven't been reading this thread for awhile, but I must say you are a breath of fresh air)

“Keep the change...”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#68471 Dec 29, 2012
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
The Spanish Inquisition were Christians. Nuff said!...and it seems that you're honest about your bigotry.
Apparently you science book thumpers fail to make the distinction between true Christians, and wolves in sheep's clothing.lol

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#68472 Dec 29, 2012
xxxooxxx wrote:
Apparently you science book thumpers fail to make the distinction between true Christians, and wolves in sheep's clothing
Ah, the "No True Scotsman" logical fallacy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_scotsman

“Keep the change...”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#68473 Dec 29, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, the "No True Scotsman" logical fallacy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_scotsman
exactly...

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#68474 Dec 29, 2012
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>OH BOY!!!! Hope you didn't get a lot of meteoric coal for Christmas***
There's no such thing as "meteoric coal". However, if I were to have found a good size nickle-iron meteor in my stocking, would have been extremely pleased!

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#68475 Dec 29, 2012
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text> Well, Leela says you're a numbskull and I tend to trust her opinion.
How about Leela, Pierre, is she your wife or daughter?
Numbskull?lol

Level 5

Since: Apr 12

Taizhou, China

#68476 Dec 29, 2012
Why don't we pull the no-true-Scotsman plea?
If the Connecticut school shooter was embarrassing to Evolutionists, then let's say that he wasn't a true Evolutionist.

Creationists always bring Haeckel's name up, so let's say that Haeckel wasn't a true Evolutionist.
FREE SERVANT
#68477 Dec 29, 2012
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
There's no such thing as "meteoric coal". However, if I were to have found a good size nickle-iron meteor in my stocking, would have been extremely pleased!
I know, I was joking and the Dude knows an agate isn't a meteor either. I have a collection of agates with pictures in them, for real!

“Keep the change...”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#68478 Dec 29, 2012
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently you science book thumpers fail to make the distinction between true Christians, and wolves in sheep's clothing.lol
and I might add...

Matthew 7:20

"Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
2words into 2new words (May '12) 2 min Old Sam 5,124
*add A word / drop a word* (Nov '12) 3 min GLEN CARTER 14,025
"Any 3 word combination" (Dec '12) 4 min GLEN CARTER 3,072
Just start naming actors and actresses (Sep '11) 5 min Old Sam 5,433
If Trump Wins 5 min Honkey 40
Post "any three words" (Sep '12) 5 min GLEN CARTER 3,339
Keep a Word.....Drop a Word Game (Sep '13) 6 min Old Sam 12,196
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 11 min Sharlene45 201,000
Who won the Presidential debate 2016 ? 13 min Red_Forman 70
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 15 min Luckys Mommmy 61,573
What Turns You Off (Jun '11) 24 min Tex 9,143
Philly grey poster hangout 1 hr Spotted Girl 85
More from around the web