Already done. At what point was immediacy ever claimed?This is yet another example of a supposed virus hitting the germ line and immediately becoming an integral part of a system, which is impossible. Refute with research if you wish but I have grown weary of your hummble opinion, circular discussion, evasion and laziness in researching and providing appropriate responses. You chose this topic, now go learn something about it, instead of wasting your entire day, every day, on line talking in circles.
Answer - you're arguing against a straw-man.
Irony meter go boom.I am actually presenting the start of an argument in this simple question you have refused to answer.
Exactly what scientific basis do evolutionists use to determine if a so called erv is ancestral or independently inserted?
If you don't know, just say so. If the correct answer is too obviously biased to speak to then just keep evading it.
You've been evading me for 2 months.
Yes, you have given your "answer". Unfortunately so far it's just baseless BS. Goddidit with magic doesn't actually EXPLAIN anything.I have given my answer to the question, now it's your turn seeing as you'd like to think you know what an acestral gene might be.
It turns out that Maz STILL suffers from the same problems which have yet to be addressed:
1 - An explanation (and evidence) of the mechanism that produced them.
2 - Reason for orthology consistent with nested hierarchies.
3 - Reason why they look like ERVs.
4 - Why they act like retroviruses when put together artificially.
5 - Why ortholog markers show differences consistent with nested hierarchies and genetic drift.
6 - Why they are even referred to as ERVs in the first place if they are not actually ERVs.
7 - Why they are using evolutionary evidence they claim doesn't even work because the Earth wasn't even around then.
8 - Why they are claiming their BS is scientific when their alternative is Godmagic.
9 - Why bother talking about evidence as it's irrelevant to magic.
10 - Why they keep lying.
Keep skipping, skippy.