Evolution vs. Creation

Full story: Best of New Orleans

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.
Comments
60,401 - 60,420 of 112,790 Comments Last updated 4 hrs ago
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64520
Dec 11, 2012
 
Russell wrote:
So it is obviously not the panacea for every ill in science publishing
But it means a heck of a lot to the layperson...
Nobody ever claimed it was perfect but it does work. You guys are just bitter that you can't even pass scientific peer-review. The one time you did scientists started complaining about the peer-review process.

:-p
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64521
Dec 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
This was not peer reviewed:
Watson, J.D. and Crick, F.H.C., A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid, Nature 171:737–738, 25 April 1953
Probably a load of rubbish
By your standards
Hey by your standards the Earth is flat and lizards and donkeys can talk.(shrug)
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64522
Dec 11, 2012
 
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
I have said that Subdud squirms like a stuck pig
But he will never admit he's wrong
Its EVOLUTION or BUST for this guy
Just more proof that there's NO SUCH thing--as "perfection".
Otherwise, "God" wouldn't have had to make the initial second, new and (sometimes--but not always--especially THESE days)improved prototype LOL.

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64523
Dec 11, 2012
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually Chucky is unwittingly not wrong in this particular case. Creationism can never be completely ruled out of science. All they need to is present a scientific case for it.
3,000 years later they have none.
And they will continue to supply none, the longer they wait to supply none the less they have to supply and when they started with none then less is not much at all

Actually some people at the parameter institute and others now thinks differently, certainly about this universe. I believe it was Neil Turok who says something along the lines “we are not certain how this universe was born but one thing is sure, no god did it”
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64524
Dec 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually Chucky is unwittingly not wrong in this particular case. Creationism can never be completely ruled out of science. All they need to is present a scientific case for it.
3,000 years later they have none.
Hey
Shrugosaurus!

You're back!
How about a shrug...

What's wrong with a shrug between old buds?

C'mon

Shrug, shrug, shrug....

I notice you are still going on about nested hierarchies

You old sandbag

How about joining us here in the 21st century

Take the Gene: TAAR1 ENSG00000146399

http://asia.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Gene/Com...

Now, of course it could be argued that the primates are all together, more similar to each other. But it should be noticed that Because this gene in Humans is less similar to Gorilla than it is to Monkeys then the Nested Hierarchy is violated between the Great Ape Gorilla which should be more similar to Humans than Humans are to Marmosets, Gibbons and Macuaques.


Not written by me, of course
Mine would be funnier:

three little monkeys sitting in a tree,

one fell out and bumped his knee,

took him to the doctor and the doctor said,

"You drive evolutionists crazy dontcha?
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64525
Dec 11, 2012
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Not baseless but demonstrated fact. Once you're capable of formulating a rational rebuttal then maybe you'll be taken seriously. As it is all you can do is preach.(shrug)
Hey, that <shrug> really is a good answer...it emits some actual realistic, logical, rational, down to earth SENSE!!!
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64526
Dec 11, 2012
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody ever claimed it was perfect but it does work. You guys are just bitter that you can't even pass scientific peer-review. The one time you did scientists started complaining about the peer-review process.
:-p
Prolly cuz they were "junking" up the walls inside the boxes and stuff lol
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64527
Dec 11, 2012
 
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Aristotle first suggested an earth-centric universe 384–322 BC
Ptolemy (AD 2nd century) expanded these ideas into what became known as the Ptolemaic system
A Christian, 16th century, Copernicus (1473–1543) postulated as a better explanation that the earth and planets revolved around the sun
Another Christian, 17th century, Galileo (1564–1642), with his telescope, was able to carry out repeated and repeatable observations which refuted Aristotle and Ptolemy, and supported Copernicus.
The heliocentric or Copernican system opposed the views of the astronomer-philosophers of the day, who earned their livelihood by teaching Aristotle and Ptolemy, and so were biased against change.
They therefore either ignored, ridiculed, destroyed, or hostilely opposed Galileo’’s writings.
Many Catholic Church leaders allowed themselves to be persuaded by the Aristotelians at the universities that the geocentric system was taught in Scripture and that Galileo was contradicting the Bible.
This was because:
1.
The Church leaders had accepted as dogma the belief system of the pagan (i.e. non-Christian) philosophers, Aristotle and Ptolemy, which had become the worldview of the then scientific establishment. The result was that Church leaders were using the knowledge of the day to interpret Scripture, instead of using the Bible to evaluate the knowledge of the day.
2.
They clung to the ‘majority opinion’ about the universe and rejected the ‘minority view’ of Copernicus and Galileo, even after Galileo had presented indisputable evidence based on repeatable scientific observations that the majority was wrong.
3.
They picked out a few verses from the Bible which they thought said that the sun moved around the earth, but they failed to realize that Bible texts must be understood in terms of what the author intended to convey. Thus, when Moses wrote of the ‘risen’ sun (Genesis 19:23) and sun ‘set’(Genesis 28:11), his purpose was not to formulate an astronomical dictum. Rather he, by God’s spirit, was using the language of appearance so that his readers would easily understand what time of day he was talking about. And it is perfectly valid in physics to describe motion relative to the most convenient reference frame, which in this case is the earth
They therefore bitterly opposed Galileo to the extent of forcing him on pain of death to repudiate his findings.
A lesson to the Church today
Do not compromise...
And you, timn17
Need to read more..
Exactly. So the Bible is literally true except when it's not. Therefore the Church got it wrong because they stuck to a literal interpretation of the Bible. Therefore the Bible is wrong. Yeah we already knew that. Thanks.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64528
Dec 11, 2012
 
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey
Shrugosaurus!
You're back!
How about a shrug...
What's wrong with a shrug between old buds?
C'mon
Shrug, shrug, shrug....
I notice you are still going on about nested hierarchies
You old sandbag
How about joining us here in the 21st century
Take the Gene: TAAR1 ENSG00000146399
http://asia.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Gene/Com...
Now, of course it could be argued that the primates are all together, more similar to each other. But it should be noticed that Because this gene in Humans is less similar to Gorilla than it is to Monkeys then the Nested Hierarchy is violated between the Great Ape Gorilla which should be more similar to Humans than Humans are to Marmosets, Gibbons and Macuaques.
Not written by me, of course
Mine would be funnier:
three little monkeys sitting in a tree,
one fell out and bumped his knee,
took him to the doctor and the doctor said,
"You drive evolutionists crazy dontcha?
Sniff...sniff...ah smell <shrug> ...no shrugging inside the boxes LOL
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64529
Dec 11, 2012
 
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, yes
They do...
From the paraellel, now defunct since every evo-god worshipper has been utterly thrashed, Creation/Evolution debate:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/TMH...
Post number 1354
Creationist Dr Russell Humphrey's model out-guns the evolutionary model
Whoops, you just contradicted yourself Russ. Ergo creationism is as useless as it's always been. But thanks for a great demonstration of that.

Better luck next time.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64530
Dec 11, 2012
 
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
And they will continue to supply none, the longer they wait to supply none the less they have to supply and when they started with none then less is not much at all
Actually some people at the parameter institute and others now thinks differently, certainly about this universe. I believe it was Neil Turok who says something along the lines “we are not certain how this universe was born but one thing is sure, no god did it”
One of the biggest, reoccuring perpetual "flaw" in SOME of humanity--the ones that are so "sure" they "know everything", when OBVIOUSLY, they don't....so they deny instead, what they have yet to comprehend.

:-)
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64531
Dec 11, 2012
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey by your standards the Earth is flat and lizards and donkeys can talk.(shrug)
Know where ah can get any francincence? It goes goood with shrug lol.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64532
Dec 11, 2012
 
Russell wrote:
Humphreys model also predicts rapid reversals of the magnetic field.
This is in defiance of the evolutionary models predictions of reversals taking thousands of years 'proving' the earth is millions of years old.
This is the usual wishful thinking exhibited by evolutionists
Right. So you claim evolutionists destroy the Earth with extra heat therefore the Earth is young thereby accelerating radioactive decay and creating more heat thereby destroying the Earth therefore Goddidit with magic.

BRILLIANT!

And who knew that evolutionists existed before the theory of evolution? It's now a time travelling conspiracy!!!

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64533
Dec 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

AustinHook wrote:
<quoted text>
"Religious factions are man made."
Along with the bible and all the rituals.
Now some religious factions are so washed out they don't even seem to recognize a God, but mainly, yes, the God believers of some sort certainly don't rule him out -- by definition. You might be surprised, but nor do I, even if there are some atheist fundies who do.
I never knew God wanted us to seek him out. I wouldn't mind his wanting us to, but I have always been fascinated to follow up any leads even without knowing or considering his wants.
Your opinion.
God exist and the bible is the written words of God.
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64534
Dec 11, 2012
 
thewordofme wrote:
Does genetics support a single couple (Adam and Eve)?
NO...
http://biologos.org/blog/does-genetics-point-...
Wrong answer

Try YES.....

Mitochondrial Eve and Y chromosome Adam
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64535
Dec 11, 2012
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. So the Bible is literally true except when it's not. Therefore the Church got it wrong because they stuck to a literal interpretation of the Bible. Therefore the Bible is wrong. Yeah we already knew that. Thanks.
Shrugosaurus

You disappoint....

As usual...

The chruch took the Aristotelian view and NOT the Bible...

Don't skim read, you old sandbag
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64536
Dec 11, 2012
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Whoops, you just contradicted yourself Russ. Ergo creationism is as useless as it's always been. But thanks for a great demonstration of that.
Better luck next time.
Heard a new one the other day--the universe as we know it--being INSIDE a "black hole".

Kind of a (no doubt on the kind of--was stemming from) a "cultish" environment but...a thought that ah'd never pondered before :-)...
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64537
Dec 11, 2012
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. So you claim evolutionists destroy the Earth with extra heat therefore the Earth is young thereby accelerating radioactive decay and creating more heat thereby destroying the Earth therefore Goddidit with magic.
BRILLIANT!
And who knew that evolutionists existed before the theory of evolution? It's now a time travelling conspiracy!!!
There ya go...more "FLAWED" meremly madmade construction lol

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64538
Dec 11, 2012
 
Honey wrote:
<quoted text>HAHAHA O your killing me and the bibles always right Right hahahahaha I'm not trying to upset you, really I'm not But that's such an insane thing to say. The bible is a story book that's all and one day waaay in the future, they will look back at the history of human evolution and think wow we've come a long way Thank Darwin we are not like that any more :)
There is only one God, Jester.
More than half of your population knows that.

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64539
Dec 11, 2012
 
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong answer
Try YES.....
Mitochondrial Eve and Y chromosome Adam
Mitochondrial Eve and Y chromosome Adam lived about 80,000 years apart

So are you saying that Adam was well into necrophilia?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

160 Users are viewing the Weird Forum right now

Search the Weird Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
I Miss You: Who do you Miss RIght Now on Topix (Jan '10) 6 min honeymylove 794
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 7 min Advice 14,869
Geico Insurance Banner Falls on Bay Area House 10 min Holy Silicon Wafer 1
If you came with a warning label what would it ... 11 min what? 213
I'd rather... (Oct '11) 12 min honeymylove 1,824
Only Three Word (Nov '09) 13 min Petal Power 11,461
What's your tip for the day? 13 min wichita-rick 228
Marine Biologist: 6th-Grader Stole My Idea 16 min Holy Silicon Wafer 2
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 35 min Petal Power 141,215
The Night Owl Saloon (Jun '11) 52 min Petal Power 15,596
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 1 hr franko 34,931
•••
•••