Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Read more
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#64346 Dec 10, 2012
AustinHook wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, hard science is all wrapped up in the etymology of words? So scientists can lay down their microscopes and test tubes and graduate school could be replaced with going bact to grammar school, right?
Nooooo...plz....we DE-evolved backwards enough he past few years LOL
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#64347 Dec 10, 2012
AustinHook wrote:
<quoted text>
Why were many of those rocks created to look like they were accreted to look like they were laid down millions of years earlier in sedimentary basins?
starts with a w and ends in an r?
Anonymous

UK

#64348 Dec 10, 2012
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
It appears that rather than me being the stinky one, Subduction Zone smells of ignorance and evasion and needs to suck eggs with the rest of the gaggle.
What is the scientific theory of creationism, enlighten us will you, oh no you can't, because there isn't one
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#64349 Dec 10, 2012
straa wrote:
<quoted text>
What is the scientific theory of creationism, enlighten us will you, oh no you can't, because there isn't one
"In the beginning there was light"

And that was probably true-A big bang of it.

Why reading comprehension and English are pretty crucial subjects as well---for indepenedent thinkers-not stuck inside narrow square boxes of limited and/or closed minded thought anyway.

Ever see red algea growth in water?

Some of it can look blood red. And underwater gas pockets can really do a number on water color too!
EvolutionRules

Oakdale, PA

#64350 Dec 10, 2012
How can someone say the earth is just 6000 years old?

Radiometric dating proves the earth is more than this age.
EvolutionRules

Oakdale, PA

#64351 Dec 10, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
"In the beginning there was light"
And that was probably true-A big bang of it.
Why reading comprehension and English are pretty crucial subjects as well---for indepenedent thinkers-not stuck inside narrow square boxes of limited and/or closed minded thought anyway.
Ever see red algea growth in water?
Some of it can look blood red. And underwater gas pockets can really do a number on water color too!
I'm a Christian and I can assure you, that isn't a scientific theory.
Anonymous

UK

#64352 Dec 10, 2012
The massive design flaws in multiple species proves that their was no designer, I am not saying that there is no god, I am just saying that life evolves through evolution, I don't know why that scares Christians, if I was a Christian I would be happy to believe in a god that created the universe in a way to ensure that creatures evolve, it is a beaughtifull idea, if I was a creator I would also have chosen the beaughtifull and elegant evolutionary process to make life, just as I would choose to create the universe, through natural processes like stars, galaxies and black holes and the singularities of the big bang, these are incredibly satisfying theorys that Christians should be happy with, and the amazing complexity of the universe ties in with their beliefs, but I personally do not believe in a god, I can't say for certain because the alternative is just as illogical, so both theories have a long way to go and are both philosophically unsatisfying, but there is so much in the bible that makes no sense and turns me off religeon, Christians say that there must be a god because things can't just come from nothing, but they have just broken their point because if things can't come out of nothing, where did god come from. I firmly believe that we are far below the level we need to be to understand the universe, its like an ant trying to understand electricity, it is currently beyond our bounds of understanding. Creationism has no evidence at all, that is fact, while evolution has more published papers and is the greatest and most proven theory on history, there is no god, we just don't understand how we came to be without a god, but we will eventually learn how, and religeons will die
Warren J

United States

#64353 Dec 10, 2012
PROFESSOR X wrote:
<quoted text>
I know ... but someones got to help him get back to reality. It's not an accident that Darwin's theory is defended more by books and movies of science-FICTION than the scientific evidence. Too bad many of these scientist hide behind their degrees and unproven press releases in order to create the illusion of being authoritative, meanwhile they are busy behind the scenes censoring any and all scientific evidence that challenges Darwin's theory from reaching the public. They are also censoring professors in universities from exposing any information to the public that threatens their little monkey fairy-tale.
The roles have been reversed. The atheist and evolutionist is today - what the Catholic Church was in the past. They hate scientific advance and would rather shut down public discussion before confronting evidence that proves that all life did not arise from one common ancestor.
That doesn't mean that the earth has to be 6000 year old. But isn't it amazing how humans were suppose to have evolved from Apes 3 million years ago, but there are organisms that are in rock strata dated over 300 million years old that are still ALIVE TODAY and they are unchanged? What's so special about us that it's necessary for evolutionists invent pseudo-science stories only fit for the Sci-Fi Channel?
Darwinism Destroyed by Geological Evidence & Anomalies
http://cross.tv/64437
Hey PX, why believe every Tom, Dick and Hairy with a fantasy or a theory.....think PX! Look at human history...The Bible story is a cover for the truth....What truth you ask? Advanced Alien Beings control and munipulate the human animal.......to many galaxies to count...there is your proof PX. Maybe human comprehension begins at the Bible and stops at ETs.
Anonymous

UK

#64354 Dec 10, 2012
There are two or three creos that are nice and sensible people, but unfortunately moat are horrible and nasty people who spew hate, maz here is the worst, she shows the very worst of the creos society, I like bat foy and also Charles iwedemi even if others don't, but I can't stand the constant crazy ranting from creos that have no evidence and make no sense at all, thay question scientists and science itself, even thoe it is humanities greatest success and has given us everything else, creos talk crap about evolution while sitting at a computer and using the web, all of which comes from science, that's because science works, and myth fairytails of god are a joke, a very very bad joke
EvolutionRules

Oakdale, PA

#64355 Dec 10, 2012
I'm a Christian and I agree with you.

I don't think everything in the bible is to be taken literally.
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#64356 Dec 10, 2012
EvolutionRules wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm a Christian and I can assure you, that isn't a scientific theory.
It's a scientific hypothesis, of UNKNOWN, INcomplete origin.

Finally, the abundance of the "light elements" Hydrogen and Helium found in the observable universe are thought to support the Big Bang model of origins.

It's also the FIRST stanzas in Genesis..

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.

3 And God said,“Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness.

But either way anyone looks at it-

In the beginning... there was probably LIGHT!!!
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#64357 Dec 10, 2012
EvolutionRules wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm a Christian and I can assure you, that isn't a scientific theory.
and PHYSICS is a classification of SCIENCE.

And Eistien was Jewish...and many other scientists have been of all different religious backgrounds. So, What's your point? Did you even have one?
Anonymous

UK

#64358 Dec 10, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
think outside the box, where else could life on earth have come from?
All that does is push the question back, if life on earth came from another planet, where did that life come from and so on and so on, untill you get right back to the orifinal lifeform, where did tgat cone from, so the panspermia theory is a meaningless idea, it just pushes the question of how life came about, further back
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#64359 Dec 10, 2012
EvolutionRules wrote:
I'm a Christian and I agree with you.
I don't think everything in the bible is to be taken literally.
I cannot imagine reading all of the Bible "literally"

That would border on insanity.

Level 1

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#64360 Dec 10, 2012
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem to have an attitude problem..:-)
I am highly intelligent.
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#64361 Dec 10, 2012
EvolutionRules wrote:
How can someone say the earth is just 6000 years old?
Radiometric dating proves the earth is more than this age.
No timexs' or radiometers back then.

If one only ever sees the The world from a limited perspective, that's all they'll ever know.
EvolutionRules

Oakdale, PA

#64362 Dec 10, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
and PHYSICS is a classification of SCIENCE.
And Eistien was Jewish...and many other scientists have been of all different religious backgrounds. So, What's your point? Did you even have one?
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. There is no scientific theory of Creationism.
FREE SERVANT

Bellevue, WA

#64363 Dec 10, 2012
AustinHook wrote:
<quoted text>
Why were many of those rocks created to look like they were accreted to look like they were laid down millions of years earlier in sedimentary basins?
MY answer is that it was a miracle just like the grapes that were in the process of making wine from water.
FREE SERVANT

Bellevue, WA

#64364 Dec 10, 2012
There is one creationist theory that predicted the cure for ALL cancer a few years ago and it claimed that our own immune system could do it. Does anybody remember SCPID?
Anonymous

UK

#64365 Dec 10, 2012
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>MY answer is that it was a miracle just like the grapes that were in the process of making wine from water.
In other words, a load of christian nonsensical drivel, untill you creos come up with any evidence at all, I will continue to not believe a word of it, I mean come on, how did he not leave any evidence at all, not even one little shred, absolutely nothing, nada, non, biente

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 6 min Jennifer Renee 10,263
News 4-Year-Old Girl Rides Philly Bus Searching for ... 22 min TALLYHO 8541 7
*add A word / drop a word* (Nov '12) 23 min _FLATLINE-------- 9,651
Post Partially Exposed Breasts Only (no total n... 25 min Beautiful Black M... 7
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 26 min TALLYHO 8541 40,000
keep a word drop a word (Sep '12) 26 min _FLATLINE-------- 7,688
***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Jan '10) 30 min _FLATLINE-------- 78,555
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 35 min I Am No One_ 159,919
BAN(N) the P0STER Above you !!! (Feb '14) 1 hr dragoon70056 4,194
Poll Can single Men be friends with Married Women? (Jun '12) 1 hr DILF 201
Word Association (Jun '10) 1 hr DILF 26,983
More from around the web