Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 220729 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#64378 Dec 10, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought there is an answer to that. The Big Bang.
The Big Bang is a hypothesis about the origine of the Universe.....cosmological, not the beginning of life itself, which is biological.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#64380 Dec 10, 2012
geeze..."origin".

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#64381 Dec 10, 2012
Makesure100 wrote:
<quoted text>
Always creation freak.
The process of bringing you into this world is called, what ?

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#64382 Dec 10, 2012
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>The master baiter is back!
The process of giving birth is WHAT?!
It's part creation and part evolution. It certainly isn't something that a couple of people decided to because they had a box full of spare parts and a free weekend ahead of them. Granted, they might accomplish the same with a weekend and a couple of bottles of wine, but they'd be a bit arrogant to take full credit for the design part.
....come to think of it, they probably do think that after too much wine. Charles, who have you been spying on NOW?
Spying what?
Creation in/ on this aspect, constitute about 70%.
Ruling out creation from science according to Makesure 100, is a freakshow.

Since: Nov 12

Raymond, Canada

#64383 Dec 10, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly what is being referenced as "junk" DNA? I ask specifically because, how would any rational scientist label any DNA as "junk" when all DNA has yet to be totally defined as to it's individual functions within the strands of?
For example, would the DNA of an onion be considered "junk", when it lends to science the ability to possibly witness the creation and mutation of bochulism, when handled incorrectly?
Seriously...and that's not "just more nothing but copy and paste hot air BS and question" question....
Exactly. It was a great surprise to most scientists after they thought they
had a handle on telling which parts of the DNA actually coded for proteins
and which didn't. It was hard to believe, but it was looking like most of
it did nothing. So some just decided to call it junk DNA, and then tried to
rationalize how that could possibly be explained. So naturally there has
been a lot of speculation about it.

I don't think it was so much the idea that there could be some parts that
were left behind by evolution as other parts of the genome changed, but what
was shocking was the possibility that maybe as much as 90% of the DNA for
some species could be non-coding.

Now it seems that parts of the previously inexplicable segments operate in a
kind of different way, and so it remains to be seen how much is really
essential. I believe most scientists in the field were expecting some sort
of explanation eventually, and were suspending judgement. Others preferred
to run with what what they saw, to see if they could make a theory that fit
that evidence. It's typical of the way science progresses, and no reason to
worry about who to criticise for leaping to conclusions. Some times those
who leap first are the pioneers, and sometimes they just arrive at the dead
end sooner, while someone else discovers the path that leads forward.
There is no cause to disparage the excitement for the pursuit of knowledge
in that way, or to take all the mistakes to blame science as a whole,
without crediting it for the progress that is eventually made.

Scientists are human, and probably a few percent never accept newer
theories. Then what happens is that ignorant people with political or
manipulative agendas try to inject politics or religious views into the
fray, pick and choose the from the results or personalities. They then make
a lot of irrational noise about it, to harness the non-scientists and the
gullible into some project they have in mind. I love fairy tales and
science fiction myself, but I keep them separate in my head, so that I know
what to depend on when reality smacks me in the face.
FREE SERVANT
#64384 Dec 10, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> God bless you. The world itself, is a miracle. How can one find water inside a rock, how does it get in there?
This and many others will tell us that the world itself is a miracle.
Yes, it is all a miracle by our God and Creator. Thank you my friend , Merry Christmas to you and yours.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#64385 Dec 10, 2012
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
The Big Bang is a hypothesis about the origine of the Universe.....cosmological, not the beginning of life itself, which is biological.
We are made of STARS. All elements (except hydrogen and helium) are formed in the stars. We are literally star dust. But I think life itself has to be 'programmed' by something out there.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#64386 Dec 10, 2012
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, it is all a miracle by our God and Creator. Thank you my friend , Merry Christmas to you and yours.
Merry Christmas to you and your lovely family also. God bless you.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#64387 Dec 10, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
"In the beginning there was light"
And that was probably true-A big bang of it.
Why reading comprehension and English are pretty crucial subjects as well---for indepenedent thinkers-not stuck inside narrow square boxes of limited and/or closed minded thought anyway.
Ever see red algea growth in water?
Some of it can look blood red. And underwater gas pockets can really do a number on water color too!
Interesting smattering of quotes and facts, but it does not answer the question.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#64388 Dec 10, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
We are made of STARS. All elements (except hydrogen and helium) are formed in the stars. We are literally star dust.
I agree. Same with my old, pos car, my television, my yard, my dog, and the planet itself. No argument there.
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>But I think life itself has to be 'programmed' by something out there.
That does have a possibility. All you need to be able to teach that belief of yours in public school classrooms is evidence of this 'programming', and evidence of the 'Programmer'.

Until then, it does not qualify as science, and thus has no place in public school classrooms.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#64389 Dec 10, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> The process of bringing you into this world is called, what ?
Birth.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#64390 Dec 10, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Merry Christmas to you and your lovely family also. God bless you.
Get a room.

Since: Nov 12

Raymond, Canada

#64391 Dec 10, 2012
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>The universe very well may have started out very very small and then branched out, however it happened in a 6 day period.
Is there any evidence for that?
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#64392 Dec 10, 2012
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
....oooookay....
<<Kong backing away slowly>>
Perfect way of handling things, Bud
See I always knew you were smart under all that stupidness

Since: Nov 12

Raymond, Canada

#64393 Dec 10, 2012
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>From my understanding of miracles, they originate from God with suddeness. Jesus performed miracles which prove this assertion. It only took long enough for him to command it to be and it was so.
Is there any physical evidence left over from those miracles?
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#64394 Dec 10, 2012
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Get a room.
Gee, you're easy
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#64395 Dec 10, 2012
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, I did see that.
A case could be made for *indirectly* receiving money through tax payers.
But this begs the question: Why would NASA and the US Air Force (among others) provide funding to SETI without those organizations holding the possibilty of a return?
A modest monetary offering by these donors could result in mighty interesting data. You might say it's a long shot (as would I), but we don't know what kind of funding they're offering.
In order to get more funding, silly
Its a popular thought amongst dodos like you that aliens are real and trying to send us coded messages...
Apologies to any Christians that also think that!

“too hard to handle”

Level 4

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#64396 Dec 10, 2012
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not really making any sense here.
The Old Testament is demonstrated to be just a bunch of myths and allegory...not real in any sense. And just think how many people have fallen for it.
How is "Thou shalt not kill" a myth or allegory?
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#64397 Dec 10, 2012
EvolutionRules wrote:
<quoted text>
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. There is no scientific theory of Creationism.
I don't adhere well to affixing "labels" onto personal beliefs..."broad range ones" especially.

"In the beginning, there was light" says plenty enough for me, to be able to appreciate BOTH the scientific aspects of the "subject", as well written words as found in non-scientific books, such as the Bible.

and I like this define better--
Scientific theory

Systematic ideational structure of broad scope, conceived by the human imagination, that encompasses a family of empirical (experiential) laws regarding regularities existing in objects and events, both observed and posited. A scientific theory is a structure suggested by these laws and is devised to explain them in a scientifically rational manner.

and even more so, since we really do NOT "know" with 100 percent certainty, on EITHER, calling the "big bang" elements a theory, would be "stretching" the truth somewhat as well, as it really is more of a "hypothesis", much along the lines of the statement "in the beginning there was light..." ..we think, but we were NOT thre, to KNOW, with certainty.

hy·poth·e·sis
[hahy-poth-uh-sis, hi-] Show IPA
noun, plural hy·poth·e·ses [-seez] Show IPA .
1.
a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.
2.
a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument.
3.
the antecedent of a conditional proposition.
4.
a mere assumption or guess.
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#64398 Dec 10, 2012
EvolutionRules wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm a Christian and I can assure you, that isn't a scientific theory.
How can you be a Christian and believe in evolution?
What did Jesus die for?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Add a Word, Ruin a Movie (Oct '13) 10 min Parden Pard 5,259
News Religious TV station in Senegal accidentally ai... 14 min Gov Corbutt of th... 5
Denny Crain's Place (May '10) 17 min _Susan_ 21,494
News NYC Mayor: 'Fearless Girl' statue can stay thro... 18 min Gov Corbutt of th... 10
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 25 min DarkSoul___ 213,280
News Teens wearing leggings barred from United fligh... 37 min Gov Corbutt of th... 13
6 letter word ...change one letter game (Oct '08) 39 min SweLL GirL 32,731
Stupid things to ponder ... (Feb '08) 49 min Chilli J 6,902
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 2 hr DMan 73,436
Memorable Movie Scenes. 2 hr Emerald 91
More from around the web