No, you keep forgetting that ancient genes, like the ones I have mentioned several times did not count as "junk" once identified. You and yours still have no answer for them. More of the code may be used than we thought but still much of it is tied up in ancient genes, which are not junk DNA, ERV's, again identified so not junk DNA. Yes, some ERV's have been found to have a use. It looks like the majority won't and yet they are still not junk DNA since they are identified. Just as a Cessna would not be a UFO once identified.<quoted text>
I can't possibly have lost because I can back what I claim and so far we are still waiting for yout osay somethjing intelligent.
1. Creationist predictions are continuing to be validated with the expectation that 100% of the genome likely to be functional. This validation comes after evolutionists shoved junk dna down creos throats as proof TOE was true, there was no designer and creos were idiots. Now they scurry off in shame, suggest TOE never could make a prediction around non coding dna but creos can clearly see just whom the idiots really are!
Collectively, the papers describe 1,640 data sets generated across 147 different cell types. Among the many important results there is one that stands out above them all: more than 80% of the human genome's components have now been assigned at least one biochemical function.
Everything I said above I have not only supported but also validated.
You have presented twoddle.
That generally means..I win.
It is a point you can't refute subby. Just like knucklewalking ancestry you will have to suck it up and admit these evos did not know what they were talking about, whilst creo claims over a decade old were validated.
So until you have answers for those you still lose the DNA battle.