Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 216634 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#64157 Dec 9, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Above aka also Why SOME of us have Always prefered to read, research, question and Always, Always--think for ourselves!! Because it'd be pretty boring to live in such a limited "self know it all world" and have to miss interesting stuff like below!
Underground Tunnels Found in Israel Used In Ancient Jewish Revolt
Brian Handwerk
for National Geographic News
March 15, 2006
A series of underground chambers and tunnels recently found in Israel were likely used as refuges during the First Jewish Revolt, archaeologists with the Israel Antiquities Authority announced.
Storage jars found in one pit were an apparent stockpile of foodstuffs for the uprising against Roman rule that began in A.D. 66.
"The pits are connected to each other by short tunnels, and it seems that they were used as hiding refuges—a kind of concealed subterranean home—that were built prior to the Great Revolt against the Romans," Alexandre said in a statement.
I don't believe I wrote the little blurb you quoted in this reply.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#64158 Dec 9, 2012
From the BBC:
"Science shows that the Biblical creation story is not literally true, and demonstrates that Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden are myths and not historical figures.
This destroys the idea of original sin as being caused by the misbehaviour of the first man and woman, and the idea of inheriting guilt or punishment for that misbehaviour.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/chris...

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#64159 Dec 9, 2012
Does genetics support a single couple (Adam and Eve)?

NO...

http://biologos.org/blog/does-genetics-point-...
anonymous

Chagrin Falls, OH

#64160 Dec 9, 2012
In quiet moments like this, I usually like to compose a dirty limerick or two to get the drama going. Maybe a bit of Wagner parody will suffice!

"I killed the wabbit!!

.....I killed the wabbit!!!"
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64161 Dec 9, 2012
O HAI MAZ! I see you're still trotting out the "junk DNA findings debunk evolution!" lie again.
MazHere wrote:
1. Creationist predictions are continuing to be validated with the expectation that 100% of the genome likely to be functional.
Yup. Some include functioning chicken teeth! But as we keep pointing out, it's not so much function as the pattern of heredity we see in DNA which demonstrates evolution.
MazHere wrote:
This validation comes after evolutionists shoved junk dna down creos throats as proof TOE was true, there was no designer
Evolution makes no such theological claims as to whether or not a God was involved.
MazHere wrote:
and creos were idiots.
And they still are.
MazHere wrote:
Now they scurry off in shame, suggest TOE never could make a prediction around non coding dna but creos can clearly see just whom the idiots really are!
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketsc...
Hence the claim a creationist prediction continues to be validated is correct. You evos are now on notice. My point 1 is established.
Except it hasn't, since we've already demonstrated you wrong. Multiple times. Chicken teeth? Evolution prediction baby. Can creationism predict ANY kind of functions at all? Well uh, no, not really. Just some vague promise that it all must do something because it all must have a purpose we just don't know what it is yet therefore EVILUSHUN IZ RONG AND GODDIDIT WITH MAGIC! In the meantime biologists are using evolutionary algorithms to predict protein function with 96% accuracy.

What's the "scientific theory" of creationism again?

.

Uhuh. Thought so.

“cdesign proponentsists”

Level 1

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#64162 Dec 9, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
There's your problem.
There's NO such thing.
My son? Yes there is, I see him sitting there in front of me.

A want to know everything? Yes there is a want to know everything and I have it.

What thing are you talking about?
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64163 Dec 9, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
The difference between mere animalistic behavior, and civilized society.
Civilized people can control themselves by litening to a little thing called conscience. Animals often can't.
Then creationists by said definition must be animals for having no conscience. Or maybe Maz has it but just isn't listening.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64164 Dec 9, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Always did say/think that the proverbial missing link lies somewhere in the "water ages" of this earth...and everything else just followed.
Derwin, like many others before--and STILL, just did NOT have the whole big picture.
No he didn't.

He correctly predicted part of that picture though. And that's why evolution is the only game in town in biological circles.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#64165 Dec 9, 2012

Level 1

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#64166 Dec 9, 2012
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
If I wanted to preach I'd go elsewhere. The true God does not care about the evolution/creation debate, He already knows. I am still curious.
I am here to see how evos can justify their incredible egos with science. So far I have found no justification with most evos being happy to talk philosophy or make challenges and then hide.
I don't really care how God created I just dislike the evoegomaniacs and like to dual with them.
I don't preach, I deal with facts. To my best interpretation, creation works. No fossil evidence proves that the evos are out to lunch. They push evo because of their hatred to acknowledge a creator, or someone to answer to. Independence is a religion you know. I duel with all the evos too. They have no evidence. NONE.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64167 Dec 9, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop putting words in my mouth.
I didn't say ALL science is wrong. You just want to pretend that I don't understand anything about it. How much do you know about DNA that you are absolutely sure that changes in DNA led to evolution?
Enough. Because if we found a giraffe with a genetic makeup that completely violated nested hierarchies then we certainly would have heard about it.

Well, unless that big mean old atheist Darwinist world-wide conspiracy covered it all up that is.

Of course if you DO happen to have a valid critique of the information I just posted then not just us but the ENTIRE BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITY would certainly love to hear about it.

I've asked that of every other fundie I've come across for years too. But they never seem to wanna take up the offer.

So so far, no, you don't appear to know very much about it. Otherwise you wouldn't have asked that question in the first place. The anti-evolutionist's FIRST place of argument is one from ignorance. That's why creationists constantly argue against straw-men.
Cybele wrote:
How do you explain a giraffe's long neck? Did it have to reach up that high to eat when it bends down to eat grass? That's just one example. I can go on and on and you wouldn't know the answer.
Of course you could. That's because Gish-gallopping is far easier than addressing reality. Of course that would only be ignoring the evidence we DO have for evolution in favour of looking for any gaps of knowledge - of which there will always be in any scientific endeavor. For if we knew *everything* we would be God.

But as it turns out, your query here doesn't even ADDRESS the validity of evolution. Giraffe have long necks? So what?(shrug) Whereas evolution CAN explain why it still has only the same amount of neck vertibrae instead of lots more (which would be much more efficient) and why the laryngeal nerve goes down from the head to the chest and back up again, and also explains why the okapi's anatomically similar.

That enough for ya?

So YES. Actually ALL of science would be re-thought if evolution were wrong. Because if something doesn't work the way it should it would tend to affect something else. Which in turn would affect something else. And something else. And so on. If evolution is wrong then geology is wrong. If geology is wrong then astrophysics is wrong. If geology and astrophysics is wrong then you have no oil for plastics and no GPS for your cellphone which now has no nice no-plastic case made of shite. Oh, and your computer does not work too. Yet here you are typing on it.

So PLEASE, put some thought behind your posts before you go off repeating some dumbazz creationist "question" which "seriously puts biology as a whole into doubt!"

The fact of the matter is that if we are dealing with anti-evolutionists then we are dealing with someone who is willfully ignorant. And I'd suggest arguing against gravity instead.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64168 Dec 9, 2012
Makesure100 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't preach, I deal with facts. To my best interpretation, creation works. No fossil evidence proves that the evos are out to lunch. They push evo because of their hatred to acknowledge a creator, or someone to answer to. Independence is a religion you know. I duel with all the evos too. They have no evidence. NONE.
Of course they don't. It's all just a big world-wide atheistic Darwinist conspiracy involving multiple countries, governments, schools, universities, courts, every major scientific organisation and literally hundreds of thousands of scientists working in the field. Oh, and some 12,000 Christian clergy to boot. Must be them "fake" Christians the creo's often tell us about huh.

Evolution really IS wrong. Why? Because life really was poofed into existence just a few short thousands of years ago by an invisible magical Jew wizard.

Or go back to 885 and try again.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64169 Dec 9, 2012
Makesure100 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't preach, I deal with facts. To my best interpretation, creation works.
By the way, I'd certainly like to know how. Presumably your "scientific theory" of GODDIDIT WITH MAGIC is relevant to the scientific method, yes? Just how did Noah re-populate the Earth after all that in-teh-fam nook-nook?

With his atoms scattered across the solar system?

THAT'S ONE HECK OF A BOTTLENECK!
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64170 Dec 9, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO! where did you get that theory about giraffes? Darwin from the 1800? LOL.
How does our DNA change? You have an explanation? or sleepiness is your excuse?
Nope. Probably yours. DNA changes due to replication error. It reproduces itself during the process of procreation but doesn't do so accurately. It has redundancy to fix errors but there are always some that get through, which is why we're all born with roughly 125 to 175 mutations. This is what enables evolution.

Creationists have just one barrier that would work. The Earth is 6,000 years old.

But then that would just be throwing ALL science out the window again.

Level 1

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#64171 Dec 9, 2012
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
By the way, I'd certainly like to know how. Presumably your "scientific theory" of GODDIDIT WITH MAGIC is relevant to the scientific method, yes? Just how did Noah re-populate the Earth after all that in-teh-fam nook-nook?
With his atoms scattered across the solar system?
THAT'S ONE HECK OF A BOTTLENECK!
Freakshow.......I look at the population at that time and calculate to our time. You must.....MUST have been at the bottom end of a dumptruck to come to your conclusions. Yes, you are a freakshow.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64172 Dec 9, 2012
Makesure100 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am pleased to see that you incorporate evolution as a theory. It will always be a theory because we don't have the fossil evidence to prove otherwise. Creation is the only adaption as to why we are even here. However, it takes humility to accept a creator.
Actually it takes pure supreme arrogance.

Just ask Maz. Few weeks back he had this big rant about how "special" he was, all because planet Earth and the entire universe was made just for him so he could spend eternity with God in eternal paradise.

But whenever I ask about the scientific evidence for the existence of the invisible Jewish wizard and the scientific mechanisms it made use of he gets strangely silent. In that area anyway.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64173 Dec 9, 2012
Makesure100 wrote:
<quoted text>
Freakshow.......I look at the population at that time and calculate to our time. You must.....MUST have been at the bottom end of a dumptruck to come to your conclusions. Yes, you are a freakshow.
Believe it or not, current population size isn't the problem (although I do remember DS doing calculations on known ancient local populations near to the time and there were some problems there, but I digress).

Genetic viability however, no THAT'S something totally different.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64174 Dec 9, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not a YEC. I don't worship Hovind like how you evos worship Darwin.
Darwin is no more worshipped than Einstein, Copernicus or Galileo.

However while even most creationists have accepted the Earth is not flat nor the center of the universe (and have some special apologetics for that to boot) there are still some which have not yet come to accept the reality of evolution. They therefore attack a scientist who has been dead for 150 years whom the main thrust of his work has since been scientifically vindicated.

We would defend Newton in the same manner if people attacked the theory of gravity so. But he would no more be "worshipped" than Darwin, he is simply recognized as someone who made important contributions to science.

Thankfully not all Christians are so ignorant.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64175 Dec 9, 2012
Makesure100 wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did you get your conscience? The ability to choose? You give credit to an unknown theory or purpose. Try to fathom a rolex watch emerging from stone dust to exactness of time. You are a fool. It's inexcusable to deny creation.
Are watches naturally-occurring self-replicating biological organisms?

No.

Can we explain the mechanisms behind the making of a watch?

Yes.

Do we also have scientific evidence of them?

Yes.

Can you explain the mechanisms behind the "creation" of a human being via the application of Jewmagic?

No.

Do we have scientific evidence of those mechanisms or said particular invisible Jewish wizard?

No.

.

I have no need to deny what you cannot demonstrate.

Could a magical Jewish wizard have created all that we see? Well sure.

But if it did, it used evolution.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#64176 Dec 9, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
I've taken Bio, Chem, Physics, Physiology, etc....so your explanation is rather mediocre.
I'm asking how does DNA of one species change into another. Since evo scientists claim that we evolved from other species. Wouldn't genetics have an explanation to this? Similarities in DNA or chromosome count doesn't account for evidence for TOE. I'd rather believe in the science of spiderman. LOL.
Oh, I see. Then you really HAVEN'T taken bio, chem, physics, physiology etc. You went to school, science class sucked and so you took interest in other things OTHER than science, and now you're pretending to know something about science. And you're just another liar for Jesus, just like pretty much every creationist we encounter in these forums. Got it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Two words only please! (Aug '08) 9 min Mr_FX 40,838
Start a sentence in alphabetical order.. 11 min Mr_FX 1,574
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 22 min Sam 67,105
*add A word / drop a word* (Nov '12) 31 min SweLL GirL 15,210
5 Letter Word, Change 1 Letter (Oct '15) 33 min SweLL GirL 5,317
Tell me a TRUTH (Dec '12) 35 min liam cul8r 1,187
GMGMike's Bar And Grill (Jan '10) 41 min liam cul8r 20,473
What Turns You Off (Jun '11) 1 hr Lucy the First 10,569
All Christmas Carols/Songs and Quotes.. 1 hr Emerald 49
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 1 hr Lucy the First 206,934
News Trump's bizarre claim that the Clinton email co... 3 hr freedom2016 984
More from around the web