That article makes no such claims. Again, you keep misunderstanding articles. Even when you hunt in the fringes you keep coming up with nothing.<quoted text>
Come on Subby, show me how your manipulated models retract that the data shows limits to the benefits of beneficial mutations.
They don't. They simply invent models to project on that MAY present a scenario that is real and that is all. The data, is the data, despite any hubris about neutrality.
You start challenges you cannot conclude.
Come on, You keep saying you have made such wonderful posts. Where are they?
Once again those writers do not indicate that they believe in any sort of limit. You have failed to show that they are wrong in any way and are merely taking statements out of context.
When it comes to your arguments there is no "there" there.