You need to remember your own words that lab studies take away half of the equation which speaks to research credibility to begin with. Lab studies are at least observation and rely less on algorithmic magic.And Maz is still repeating her bogus claim of genetic deterioration.
Maz, the articles you find don't support you. They are lab studies where they took away half of the evolutionary process. They are only studying random mutation. You and all of your other creatard friends conveniently keep forgetting the other half of the equation; naturals selection.
Yes, it is easy to debunk evolution, if you only allow half of it. You will see creatards claim "Random mutation alone will not cause evolution" or "Random selection will only go so far". And both of these statements are true on their own and they are both LIES since they ignore the other half of the driving process of evolution.
Keep on making your busted claims Maz and we will keep busting them. You are only fooling yourself and your creatard friends. At least you outperform Russell in that regard.
You have not overturned any of my 6 points yet. Now you want to say that the data on the deteriorating genome and epistasis is what?...Not the entire story! Congratulations!
You tell me of a bit that makes such a huge difference to any point I have made.