No! Deterioration does not result in non coding dna.<quoted text>
I thought the current creationist hypothesis was that the human genome was deteriorating at an alarming rate. Doesn't mutation cause a loss of information, turning more and more DNA into useless noise? Shouldn't it be expected that there will be a not-insignificant portion of the human genome that is... well,'junk?'
For example the deterioration of the human male Y chromosome relates to the loss of genes, not the accumulation of junk.
Indeed evolutionists just go with the flow and don't care as they can invent any story as they go along. You have a philosophy, not a science.
Your irrefuteable evidence for TOE in junk dna has been sent to that huge rubbish bin of evolutionary delusions past full of what once upon a time was evidence.