Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 172029 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Since: Sep 12

Fort Worth, TX

#63456 Dec 5, 2012
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>Established by Agnostics mostly, from what I hear. Why else would there be the separation of church and state and secular control.

I think our founding fathers were well educated and were a little leery of religion. EVERY time religion controls society people and society suffer greatly.

Creationism loses its credibility with me when it tries to move in on our schools and teach grossly wrong junkscience and try to exert moral control of the citizenry. My words to them are: quite trying to take over and impose your bullsh!t values on me.
Read the constitution and please tell me where it says separation of church and state. IT DOESN'T
anonymous

Franklin, PA

#63457 Dec 5, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> I am not preaching but clarifying.
That's a funny way of describing the act of painting the walls with the contents of your dirty diaper.

Right, Mr. GooGoo?

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#63458 Dec 5, 2012
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
Established by Agnostics mostly, from what I hear. Why else would there be the separation of church and state and secular control.
I think our founding fathers were well educated and were a little leery of religion. EVERY time religion controls society people and society suffer greatly.
Creationism loses its credibility with me when it tries to move in on our schools and teach grossly wrong junkscience and try to exert moral control of the citizenry. My words to them are: quite trying to take over and impose your bullsh!t values on me.
Bill, your unbelief of the bible and God definitely will not change the reality of God's existence.
Our problem generally, is see and belief. But can you see spirits physically? no, but the world, its composition, enable us to know that there is a God. We use faith to determine this( that).

Since: Sep 12

Fort Worth, TX

#63459 Dec 5, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>Who wrote the constitution? I know Thomas Jefferson was rather heavily involved and he was not a Christian. He was a deist who did not believe in miracles, the Trinity, or the divinity of Jesus.

Ben Franklin seemed to be an atheist, though he was not a direct writer of the Constitution. Early America had more deists (those who believed in god but weren't Christians) and atheists than your history classes taught you.
Some light reading he may have been deist but that's even a maybe
http://www.wnd.com/2002/06/14285/

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#63460 Dec 5, 2012
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>That's a funny way of describing the act of painting the walls with the contents of your dirty diaper.
Right, Mr. GooGoo?
Lol
Dirty? that is an understand. In the US alone, they( the Christians) are in the majority.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#63461 Dec 5, 2012
Typo:
I meant, understatement and not understand.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#63462 Dec 5, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> I am not preaching but clarifying.
Fine.

Let's assume that you've clarified.

You may go now.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#63463 Dec 5, 2012
Bat Foy wrote:
<quoted text>
Read the constitution and please tell me where it says separation of church and state. IT DOESN'T
The phrase came from Thomas Jefferson and he was one of the writers of the constitution. If you want to say that the constitution should be interpreted as the the writers meant it when they first wrote it then you have to go by what Jefferson said.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#63464 Dec 5, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Lol
Dirty? that is an understand. In the US alone, they( the Christians) are in the majority.
Typographical error:
I meant, " understatement ", and not, " understand "...

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#63465 Dec 5, 2012
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Fine.
Let's assume that you've clarified.
You may go now.
Don't be scared buddy, i am a registered member.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#63466 Dec 5, 2012
Bat Foy wrote:
<quoted text>
Some light reading he may have been deist but that's even a maybe
http://www.wnd.com/2002/06/14285/
No, that had nothing that said that Jefferson was not a deist. And, worse yet, it was from a biased source.

Jefferson's religious views were well known. A weak religious site is not going to undo history.

Since: Sep 12

Fort Worth, TX

#63467 Dec 5, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>The phrase came from Thomas Jefferson and he was one of the writers of the constitution. If you want to say that the constitution should be interpreted as the the writers meant it when they first wrote it then you have to go by what Jefferson said.
So the constitution that was signed and we made our laws by shouldn't be read as it is but what he meant it to say or what you wish he meant it to say. Well than in that case lets do everything that way and make evolution the same as creation because I sure wish creation is what Darwin was saying so it is.
I live in a land where people say what they mean not what some other guys says it means.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#63468 Dec 5, 2012
Bat Foy wrote:
<quoted text>
So the constitution that was signed and we made our laws by shouldn't be read as it is but what he meant it to say or what you wish he meant it to say. Well than in that case lets do everything that way and make evolution the same as creation because I sure wish creation is what Darwin was saying so it is.
I live in a land where people say what they mean not what some other guys says it means.
What, you clearly did not understand what I wrote.

The wording of the Constitution clearly left some questions about how church and state should interact. Jefferson, one of the main writers of the Constitution. If he was not an expert you would go to for clarification who would you go to? I am very much a original intent person when it comes to the Constitution. That means I am big on Second Amendment Rights, even though I do not now personally own a gun.

If the meaning of the Constitution is not clear to you, who better than old TJ to go for a clarification?

Since: Nov 12

Milk River, Canada

#63469 Dec 5, 2012
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all. I just say that the "faithful" here don't know what they are or what they are looking for. They expect to find out through the only actions that they feel they can trust. They would spy on people who don't know they are being spied on.
You've got totally mangled people in the faith funny farm.
I'm still looking to understand what people who claim "faith" in God, Jesus or whatever, mean by it. I figure I might be able to make at least a plausible case for some kind of God out there, and I might suspect that it was correct, but I wouldn't phrase it as faith. More likely I'd apply the word "faith" to my confidence in a light switch that had served me well already 10,000 times.

I know many people of "faith" who don't carry a lot of the baggage that the current wave of born-twicers do, and whose lives are much less messed up than those of many sceptics I know. I only wish there were an easy philosophical key to dealing with life. My experience is that religion is more like skin colour -- rather superficial to the innate personality.

As far as spying on people goes, I'm convinced that as many or more "liberal" or even non-believer politicians rationalize their need for warrantless spying as the other side does. It seems to me to be a moral failure along a different axis.

Since: Nov 12

Milk River, Canada

#63470 Dec 5, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Bill, your unbelief of the bible and God definitely will not change the reality of God's existence.
Our problem generally, is see and belief. But can you see spirits physically? no, but the world, its composition, enable us to know that there is a God. We use faith to determine this( that).
Sure sounds backwards to me. If the world and its composition allow one to know that there is a God, then faith derives from that, rather than that faith determines the world and it's composition.

Since: Nov 12

Milk River, Canada

#63471 Dec 5, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Bill, your unbelief of the bible and God definitely will not change the reality of God's existence.
Seems to me it should be more like "your [belief] of the bible and God definitely will not change the reality of.. existence.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#63472 Dec 5, 2012
AustinHook wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure sounds backwards to me. If the world and its composition allow one to know that there is a God, then faith derives from that, rather than that faith determines the world and it's composition.
Opinions do differ(s).

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#63473 Dec 5, 2012
Bat Foy wrote:
<quoted text>
Read the constitution and please tell me where it says separation of church and state. IT DOESN'T
Just didn't explain myself well...not to get upset my friend.

The country was set up so that religion did not control law and policy making. There was no national religion, like Sweden for instance.

In America many sects existed, but none were "officially" endorsed.

From what I understand the only reason many of the founders espoused religion was they could get killed if they disagreed too much. Religion is like that you know.

They still want it to be that way if you listen to the redneck creotards that clog many reply pages on some websites.

Religion is dangerous no matter which one you are talking about

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#63474 Dec 5, 2012
AustinHook wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems to me it should be more like "your [belief] of the bible and God definitely will not change the reality of.. existence.
Your translation or understanding.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#63475 Dec 5, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Bill, your unbelief of the bible and God definitely will not change the reality of God's existence.
Our problem generally, is see and belief. But can you see spirits physically? no, but the world, its composition, enable us to know that there is a God. We use faith to determine this( that).
Well Charles since I don't believe any God exists of course I am not changing the "reality" of God. God is not a reality.

My mission in life is to turn religious believers into non-believers by showing them the ridiculousness of that belief and how ridicules the whole sky-daddy thing is. We are very far away from the bronze age now and we need to stand up and cast off the old boogeyman who some think controls human destiny somehow.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 3 min SLY WEST 167,418
Interesting Quotes (Jun '11) 5 min Alain Vain 14,615
News Massachusetts woman's chicken getting $2,500 pr... 6 min wichita-rick 3
Add a Word remove a Word (Oct '13) 8 min Alain Vain 2,118
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 12 min Alain Vain 12,808
Word Association (Jun '10) 16 min Alain Vain 28,505
Word Association (Mar '10) 17 min Alain Vain 17,724
Answer a question with a question 2 hr Mr_FX 500
Last Word is First Word (no "breast" word please) 3 hr andet1987 225
last word/first word. (Apr '12) 5 hr andet1987 6,120
More from around the web