Noted it, I have gone out of my way to show how you mischaracterize the use of these references.<quoted text>
You may not that my siz points are accompanied by research to support my view.
You and evo researchers are as blind a rock and about as clever. There is no concern on my part about what the footprints look like.
It is your reseachers that have to scratch around like a gaggle of geese and poof them into something that saves your bird paradigm from falsification, again.
You have offered your opinion which amounts to hubris.
Your reserchers are more confused than ever they were and everything I have spoken to demonstrtes it from the deteriorating genome, to their crap about junk dna, to their changing of definitions to suit the data, to TOE's misrepresentation of genomic and fossil evidence.
Evolutionists remain gobsmacked as their flavours of the month turn to rot.
It is always amusing to be judge stupid by a complete moron. You have me laughing again.
Bird paradigm? This is part of your misuse of the references. You have never gone into detail about how and what would result if these turn out to be truly the footprints of modern-like birds. You have gagged on a length about how it will destroy the theory of evolution, but with no substance to support that.
No, I have clearly called you out for your missuse of a few selected articles that do not do what you claim they do. I don't really need to offer supporting papers to do that.
You have offered your opinion, which amounts to brain damaged nonsense.
Yours is a typical trick used to overwhelm a solid position. Make a great deal of noise about nothing and misdirect the argument away from the main points. You aren't doing anything new or original. It was easy to catch and now you are flopping around trying to get back into the water so you can swim away.
No, all you have demonstrated is that you have become aware, probably through some organization that feeds you your opinion, about some possibly interesting data at the cutting edge of research. In doing so, you have demonstrated your piss poor understanding of science, the theory of evolution and even how to read and interepret your own references.
Now, declare victory and move along.