Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 223366 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#62575 Dec 3, 2012
AustinHook wrote:
<quoted text>
Even if we concede the point, this changing of the un-real to the real seems to happen so rarely that we certainly don't bother to build it into our technology. Shame about how hard it is to make it work, because it could be used to make a really handy light switch for the kitchen or bathroom.
Hmmm.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#62576 Dec 3, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Belief in oneself does not make things real or factual or that things will change because you believe. All it means is that you have a dream and are very often willing to delude yourself for the sake of a dream.
It was faith that led the inventors to come up with their inventions.

“Be strong ...”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#62577 Dec 3, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> You don't have clue. Your clues are nothing, but insults.
I have given you facts and you have insulted me and without any corroborating evidence you have denied those facts why? Because you can’t actually prove those facts wrong but feel the good christian need to hurt your opponent

I have shown you that the words “faith” and “fact” are different words with different meanings and you have done nothing but act with incredulity and moan and spout irrelevancies and lies and name call because you have nothing to prove me wrong

You complain about people offering you insults when you accuse people you do not know of heinous crimes, you complain about people offering you insults when you falsely accuse people you do not know of lying simply because their statement goes against you faith. Why are you such a pathetic two faced moron?

Honey when you have EVIDENCE that faith and fact are one and the same the feel free to come back and try again, until then you have nothing but your own belief and you own belief is not worth squat

Since: Sep 12

Dallas, TX

#62578 Dec 3, 2012
NikkiShae wrote:
<quoted text>"I don't know" is pretty much equal to "I gave up". Imagine that world where scientist just gave up.
Than why not "we don't know yet" I do think this would save a lot of time in txt.

“Be strong ...”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#62579 Dec 3, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> It was faith that led the inventors to come up with their inventions.
Nope, it was thought, ingenuity, intelligence and perseverance, and the ability to understand a problem and postulate a solution to that problem. The faith came after the invention, the faith that you solution is what is actually required to address the problem, that is the nature of (at least) human thought.

To assume that inventions are faith based is to deny and decry the ingenuity of humanity

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#62580 Dec 3, 2012
Cybele wrote:
I don't understand TOE because it doesn't make any sense.
What part of it doesn't make sense to you?

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#62581 Dec 3, 2012
Cybele wrote:
Don't you see how strange it is that we have morphed from fishes to amphibians to reptiles to mammals even if it happened in a span of millions of years?
Hundreds of millions of years, actually.

And this is strange to you, why?
anonymous

Chagrin Falls, OH

#62583 Dec 3, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> You don't have clue. Your clues are nothing, but insults.
Your faith is nothing but denial.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#62584 Dec 3, 2012
Cybele wrote:
Seriously though, how did apes develop a voice box that gave humans today capability for language?
Other apes have a larynx, too.

The significant difference is that, in humans, the larynx is descended.

Since: Sep 12

Dallas, TX

#62585 Dec 3, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>Do you not see how...delusional that is?
No
2 Timothy 3 1-7
1 but mark this There will be terrible times in the last days.
2 people will be lovers of themselves lovers of money boastful proud abusive disobedient to their parents ungrateful unholy
3 without love unforgiving slanderous without self-control brutal not lovers of the good
4 treacherous rash conceited lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God
5 having a form of Godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with them.
6 they are the kind who worn their way into homes and gain control over weak willed women who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires
7 always learning but never able to acknowledge the truth.
anonymous

Chagrin Falls, OH

#62586 Dec 3, 2012
Bat Foy wrote:
<quoted text>
Than why not "we don't know yet" I do think this would save a lot of time in txt.
To a large extent, science has already gone beyond "We don't know yet". A large part of modern theory is based on unprovable, yet reliable predictions.

A large part of layman language is based on a misconception. The phrase "quantum leap" is actually about taking the smallest possible "leap of faith" to accept phenomena that are too small to measure with any known method.

You have TV shows and sales slogans that always portray the "quantum leap" as some sort of galaxy hopping act. It's not! It's taking the provable down to the absolute limit before indulging in the theoretical.
anonymous

Chagrin Falls, OH

#62587 Dec 3, 2012
Bat Foy wrote:
<quoted text>
No
2 Timothy 3 1-7
1 but mark this There will be terrible times in the last days.
2 people will be lovers of themselves lovers of money boastful proud abusive disobedient to their parents ungrateful unholy
3 without love unforgiving slanderous without self-control brutal not lovers of the good
4 treacherous rash conceited lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God
5 having a form of Godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with them.
6 they are the kind who worn their way into homes and gain control over weak willed women who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires
7 always learning but never able to acknowledge the truth.
If there's a truth there, it's that humanity is psychologically unable to handle the complexities of urban life.

The species will collapse into war, many will die, and those who remain will evolve somehow. Perhaps we will from a caste-based hive mentality. Perhaps we will embrace a Nietzsche-like, warrior-poet type of behavior where conflict is embraced as a part of life. Consider it a truth that as long as we live, there will always be conflict.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#62588 Dec 3, 2012
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
That was kind of my attitude at first too. But Charles is a snake-oil salesman. When he's losing a debate, he starts debating completely irrelevant issues. He's not interested in truth. He's posing for the camera and claiming that he wins discussions by "faith" when in reality, people just get bored silly with his wandering rants.
But hey, I'm not the forum policeman. You can see for yourself. I've been digging around to see if any of the Creationists have any more transcendent arguments than a literal translation of the Bible but so far, nothing.
You seem to get three types here. You get the reactionary conservatives who are actually stealthing in bigoted conservative politics. Generally, they're all stereotypical reactionaries who blame the minorities for living off of the gubermint. You'll see a few social-misfit optimists who don't hang around long because people don't like it when they get preachy. Finally, you have a group of scarey, messianic wannabees, which Charles is definitely part of.
Personally, if there were a group I'd be interested in hearing from it would be the Jesuits, but I don't think they even deny Evolution.
Hmmm. You must be a phobia of Charles. Do you hate the word, truth?
anonymous

Chagrin Falls, OH

#62589 Dec 3, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> It was faith that led the inventors to come up with their inventions.
Charles, you're lying every time you post. Why do you lie?

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#62590 Dec 3, 2012
15th Dalai Lama wrote:
<quoted text>
It is no surprise you are too much a wimp to fight with God.
Can a dead man fight?
Death! one of the characteristics of living things.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#62591 Dec 3, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
I have given you facts and you have insulted me and without any corroborating evidence you have denied those facts why? Because you can’t actually prove those facts wrong but feel the good christian need to hurt your opponent
I have shown you that the words “faith” and “fact” are different words with different meanings and you have done nothing but act with incredulity and moan and spout irrelevancies and lies and name call because you have nothing to prove me wrong
You complain about people offering you insults when you accuse people you do not know of heinous crimes, you complain about people offering you insults when you falsely accuse people you do not know of lying simply because their statement goes against you faith. Why are you such a pathetic two faced moron?
Honey when you have EVIDENCE that faith and fact are one and the same the feel free to come back and try again, until then you have nothing but your own belief and you own belief is not worth squat
Likewise.
You can not force your delusions on me. Faith is all embracing. Period.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#62592 Dec 3, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, it was thought, ingenuity, intelligence and perseverance, and the ability to understand a problem and postulate a solution to that problem. The faith came after the invention, the faith that you solution is what is actually required to address the problem, that is the nature of (at least) human thought.
To assume that inventions are faith based is to deny and decry the ingenuity of humanity
Those qualities mentioned by you, can not be successful in humans. Except through the application of faith. Faith is all embracing.

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Level 5

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#62593 Dec 3, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
It is my secret new stalking technique. Figure out what someone is going to say before they say it and use this old dilapidated software to post ahead of them.
Mu-ha-HA!
Wow!

Ok. Concentrate. I'm looking at the stock market tomorrow. What are the outcomes?

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Level 5

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#62594 Dec 3, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
All organisms adapt to their environment but I find it impossible for one type of organism to evolve into another. Remember Aristotle's causality dilemma? did the chicken or the egg come first? Scientists to this day don't even have an answer to that let alone provide evidence for evolution.
No. All organisms do not adapt to their environments. Where ever did you get that idea? Drop a turkey off at the North Pole or the Gobi desert and count how many seconds it survives.

Your personal incredulity and inability to "imagine" speciation is not a hindrance for the science of biology, I'm sorry to say. That tells us about you and not about science. You have limitations.

We know what came first with Chicken or egg. Would you care to guess?

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Level 5

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#62595 Dec 3, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
In theory, it could work. It doesn't matter how related we are to Pongo or New World Monkeys. I could say that we are also related to bananas.
Whether we were created or genetically engineered, we don't know. But my point here is, there is no evidence for TOE or creation.
You could say whatever you like. However, no one will give a damn if you say "humans are related to bananas." They will just ignore you.

We know that species evolve through time. You may not understand this, but so what? You are hardly the bastion of knowledge for biological science. You don't make any high level decisions about the state of research or the state of medical science. And, frankly, I'm glad. Sorry. But you don't seem to care that you know almost nothing about biological science while strangely feeling compelled to speak about it.

All evidence, every single speck of it, tells us evolution happened and is ongoing. There's not a shred of evidence to show otherwise.

Just because you are entirely unfamiliar with the evidence doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Sorry, but the tree fell without your knowledge.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
A Potpourri of Expressions in Words & Rhyme (Sep '12) 15 min wichita-rick 1,243
Change 1 letter game! (Nov '11) 32 min Jerry 12,020
A six word game (Dec '08) 1 hr Pardon Pard 21,490
Last 3 Letters into 3 new words. (Dec '08) 1 hr Pardon Pard 62,699
2words into 2new words (May '12) 1 hr Doobie Time 9,391
Poll How Long Have You Won in "Last Post Wins" thread? (Jan '09) 2 hr tiger_-_dad 7,072
The Next Person Game (Mar '11) 3 hr -TheExam- 10,850
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 6 hr Camilla 230,153
WHo ARe YOu THinking ABout RIght NOw (Jul '13) 8 hr Alyssa76 1,132
Stupid things to ponder ... (Feb '08) 13 hr A winner 7,945