So now you want to digress. The fake that you are.<quoted text>
Nope, the burden of proof is upon you for this particular claim. You are the one making a positive claim, it is up to you to prove your claim. That is how the rules of debate go.
And you have yet to admit that you were wrong about Sanford being peer reviewed. I am still waiting.
My post above does address the burden of proof that the genome could not possibly have evolved over billions of years.
Creation is supported. TOE is falsified.
The burden is now on you to supply some shred of evidence to the contrary instead of chasing your tail.
We creos already know you can't support your view. Prove me wrong.