Another example of an evotard trying their best to save face on this forum and making a boofhead of herself at every opportunity.<quoted text>
Lyingbitch I and several others have explained and posted links to peer reviewed evidence from renowned sites belonging to educational establishments (universities etc), the worlds leading scientific establishments, governments and religious organisations and you have done sweet foockall but ignore those evidences
What have you done to bolster you own opinion? Lied, misdirected, mistakenly posted to links that contradict and disprove your view and posted links to creation com who openly admit that they are not a scientific establishment and facts in no way temper their opinion as well as other similar non scientific mumbo jumbo.
If you actually had some idea of what you are taliking about you would specify instead of offering you vague BS in place of research.
As I said evos can quack, but they cannot provide any evidence to counter my post.
The genome is deteriorating in line with Sanfords general claim.
Come one evos, are you going to give up so soon?
I have supplied what you lot call empirical peer reviewed research to support my calims. Evos have posted nothing more than evasion.
That means that evolutionists really are the loosers on this thread. They can rant, ridicule, evade and demand peer reviewed research, but they cannot supply a shred of empirical research to defend themselves. That is why I refer to many evolutionists like Christine, Subduction Zone and Dude etc as 'Quackers" and "Wofflers".
My research links speaking to the genome deterioration of a variety of species is from evo researcher and is not misquoted, you sorry example of an evolutionist.