Translation - Genesis is ancient dogma that you can interpret to your convenience while science adapts to new evidence. Remember you DID claim that Genesis "predicted" the correct order of events as science allegedly discovered "later", despite the fact that science does NOT support the sun coming AFTER plants.My theory of creation is already set out in Genesis. Genesis continues to be validated. At least Genesis provides an account to support of falsify. Where as TOE continues to change the scenarios that support it and any old story will do.
What energy and how? First can you demonstrate this god of yours exists via the scientific method?My creationist theory is that there is a God and that God can use his ENERGY to create matter
What mechanism? You just said energy can create matter therefore Goddidit with magic. Where's the science?Hence the 'mechanism' for creation is supported.
and modern leatherback turtles at the bottom?Eg fossils found in line with Genesis as opposed to TOE
And sun after plants. Oops. PLEASE demonstrate the scientific evidence that demonstrate that plants arose BEFORE the sun.moon created after the earth as opposed to initial scientific thinking
Until you start addressing rebuttals every time you repeat this, you are lying.Being created by a creator predicts no requirment for left over junk dna nor left over functionless organs from evolution, quite the opposite to TOE.
Yes, young Earth, old Earth - doesn't matter. Hypocrites like you can use both.This is the lack of scientific integrity that creationists come against and have to battle against continually.
And your victory is at least as equal to that of the Black Knight. WELL DONE FINE WARRIOR SIR!I claimed victory in demonstrating over a week or so that indeed what evolutionists call empirical evidence isnt any better than what creos have to offer.
Transitional fossils, as predicted by Darwin. In fact I already presented this to you numerous times over. Yet for some strange reason here you are asking for it again. And later on you will ask it again. Not that you haven't been given the answers required, but you have only been given that answer that reality is theologically inconvenient to creationists.What predictions does TOE offer that were not made in hindsight and actually are predictions? That should not be difficult for evos to research and find. If you need help I can post a dandy!