Posts based on bronze age guesswork will never provide more credibility than the supported view<quoted text>
A post based on opinion will never provide more credibility than the supported view I can present with research in support of my views and assertions. eg my last post. Evos here appear to be too stupid to even understand what research and support looks like.
I'd say peer reviewed research from your own researchers is support for my view as opposed to these woffly replies I get from the likes of idiots like you.
As I said you evos here on this forum are hopelessly ignorant and uneducated in the science they are trying to defend and doing a bad job of I may add!
Let us SEE you provide research in support of your views and assertions. Dont just talk about it, you could be lying (most crustards do lie), let us SEE it
eg my last post. Evos here appear to be too stupid to even understand what research and support looks like.
That my dear is guesswork, so common in godbot hate merchants like you. You have NO IDEA who you are talking about or what research actually involves. All you have is a bronze age book of goddidit myth and proven lies and an iron age book of deceit about a murderer and terrorist which was compiled by committee some 300 years after events on which to build your religion
As yet you have ranted abundantly about peer-reviewed research you CAN present and NOT EVER presented any evidence that such peer reviewed research actually exists
FYI, I have researched the babble in university, As a student I was involved in compiling and correlating evidence for my professor that PROVES the late jc was a criminal, murdering terrorist upon which several academic books have now been written.
Your delusion and denial of facts simply highlight your own deliberate ignorance and your inability to produce ANY peer reviewed research simply indicates you are lying for your god.