Yet more than 80% Of the genome does not contribute to the development of the phenotype. Much of this material is recognizable as bits and pieces of nonfunctioning genes and retroviral inserts.1. Creationist predictions that if the creation was made by the hand of God there would be no need for junk dna are currently being validiated.
Your contention is equivalent to looking at the remains of an old car that hasn't run in decades and claiming that it isn't junk because it might have some usable parts.
Does the failure of your "Creationist predictions" mean that you'll abandon your God?
See above.2. Evolutionists that shoved junk dna down creationists throats over the past decade, were actually presenting flawed and incomplete data and now have to suck eggs.
In your DNA are the remains of three genes that code for egg yolk. They no longer function, but by synteny and sequence similarity, they are recognizable as the same three that are still functional in birds. They are left from our common ancestor with birds.(I won't waste time explaining how we know that unless you ask.)3. Evolutionists asserted that this non functional dna was the left overs from evolution. Now this great evidence has been falsified. TOE has either a failed prediction or never could make a prediction around non coding dna.
Is this the sort of thing you claim to have falsified?
Most structures have function. A few (like hind limbs on whales, eyes on blind creatures) have degenerated beyond that point and will eventually be lost.4. Creationist predictions around all organs having function and not being left overs from some deep evolutionary event are also being validiated.
Blind Cave Fish.5. Evolutionists predicted and thought they'd found left over non functional organs and called them vestigial.
They had a function in ancestral forms and now they have a different function. They've evolved.6. Evolutionists have had to redefine the definition of vestigial because what has been found is that vestigial organs do have function. Not only do they have function they also have a different function.
This one's too esoteric for me.7. Evolutionists have great hand waving abilities and poof mythical theropods into existence to save their bird paradigm from total falsification. This is an example of evo handwaving.
Again, you seem not to have a point.8. Handwaving has been evoked in relation to all fossil and genomic evidence in support of TOE, including mankinds ancestry with chimps.
The only prediction is that any discoveries concerning species diversity will conform to the model described by the theory. So far, so good. You haven't found anything that contradicts that, have you?9. TOE has predictive ability akin to a crystal ball.
You've provided no support for Creationism nor any substantive contradictions to ToE.10. The support I can provide for creationism could not be worse than the 150 years of instability and falsifications evos have to offer.
Whatever you say.That kinda sums up what I have demonstrated that you no longer want to talk about because none of these above have been successfully refuted.