Sure you can debunk evolution if you use straw man arguments. Why don't you try to argue against what the theory of evolution actually says?Maybe it programmed the organisms to be able to adjust within certain parameters. You seem to think that that if you jump off a cliff, you'll evolve wings before hit the bottom. Perhaps the Russian citizenry discovered the Christians weren't public enemy #1 like Marx, Lenin, and Stalin claimed. Maybe as they witnessed them being shipped off to the Gulag didn't make their own life any better. And maybe they saw something real instead of listening to a bunch of empty promises from their government, media, and professors.
Earlier you lied and said there is no evidence for evolution. Well, perhaps you didn't lie. You might be a total gibbering idiot. Those are the only two possible cases. Now there is no scientific evidence that supports creation, you could have claimed that. Of course a group that is largely responsible for that is creationists themselves. The problem with scientific evidence is that it cuts both ways and creationists who know at least a smidgeon of science know that it would be too easy to debunk any hypothesis of creation. It would not ever get to the theory stage.