Evolution vs. Creation

[Charles Idemi]

Drew Smith wrote:

Whether you like it or not, the Angles and Saxons spoke the same language on their boats that they spoke right after they got off their boats.
Now, provide the evidence to support your claim that modern Germans can understand Old English.
We're *still* waiting.
<quoted text>
Gee, maybe that has something to do with the idea that "English people" means "people from England".(It doesn't say whether or not such people speak the English language.)
But now, you're trying to avoid your error, which I'll point out again: Now, provide the evidence to support your claim that modern Germans can understand Old English.
We're *still* waiting.

The Saxons and the Angles, spoke old English. That English is not the same as modern English.
So, that old English is more of German than modern English.
By this, the Germans can understand old English spoken by the Angles and Saxons.

[Charles Idemi]

Drew Smith wrote:

Charles seems to think that speakers of *modern* German can understand Old English.
<quoted text>
No, it's false. You've provided no evidence to support its being true.
<quoted text>
Wikipedia (learn to spell it and capitalize it correctly, Charles) doesn't say that modern Germans can understand Old English.
Why do you lie about this?

Before you open that mouth of yours to insult something, you do your research!
" Wikipaedia ", is correct.
That is, British English.

[Charles Idemi]

Drew Smith wrote:

Charles seems to think that speakers of *modern* German can understand Old English.
<quoted text>
No, it's false. You've provided no evidence to support its being true.
<quoted text>
Wikipedia (learn to spell it and capitalize it correctly, Charles) doesn't say that modern Germans can understand Old English.
Why do you lie about this?

I stand on my word.
Again, the word, Wikipaedia is very very correct.
Do your research on British and American spelling. My only error, was on capitalisation( US = capitalization).

[macumazahn]

Dogen wrote:

<quoted text>
Matthew 24:34 I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.

And yet that generation, and many since, did...

[KittenKoder]

TJ Monk wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you stupid or just insane? Where does air come from? Water, our most important ingredient? The more you learn about our home...the dumber you become. Move to Mars and see what you are missing. We are on the only planet suitable for living on (in our known solar system). I must say that this site is dedicated to stupid people. Reading your posts indicates that you are just a ignorant Freakshow.

Well, stars, like our sun, die. This matter that is spewed from their deaths consists of water, air, and a lot of other really important particles that are needed for life.

Do you have any more elementary school level questions?

[macumazahn]

Charles Idemi wrote:

<quoted text> Before you open that mouth of yours to insult something, you do your research!
" Wikipaedia ", is correct.
That is, British English.

No.

"Wikipedia" is a proper noun, coined by a couple of Nupedia types back in 2000.

They invented it, they can spell it any way they want - much as the creators of Krispy Kreme can.

And since Wiki is American, the spelling's acceptable anyway.

[anonymous]

TJ Monk wrote:

<quoted text>
FREAKSHOW...why are you here? Who really cares about what you are saying? Take your FREAKSHOW elsewhere......

Off your medicine again, eh? You should try to make friends. Dogan is into pharmaceuticals, if I remember correctly. I pity him if that's the case! Those people live an assembly line life, put up with obnoxious people in the medical profession and are expected to be constantly perfect!

Technical experts should unionize and put some teeth back into collective bargaining! When Reagan shafted the airline pilots, he brought down Western Civilization. It's too late now. All we have are money grubbers playing king of the hill.

[Charles Idemi]

TJ Monk wrote:

<quoted text>
FREAKSHOW...why are you here? Who really cares about what you are saying? Take your FREAKSHOW elsewhere......

Brat...

[Charles Idemi]

macumazahn wrote:

<quoted text>No.
"Wikipedia" is a proper noun, coined by a couple of Nupedia types back in 2000.
They invented it, they can spell it any way they want - much as the creators of Krispy Kreme can.
And since Wiki is American, the spelling's acceptable anyway.

Is Wikipaedia wrong, yes or no?

[Double Fine]

Charles Idemi wrote:

<quoted text> Is Wikipaedia wrong, yes or no?

Wrong.

The project name is Wikipedia.

Just like Krispy Kremes. Or the bands Limp Bizkit and Staind. Or Kellog's Rice Krispies.

[ToManyLaws]

The religous say evolution cant be real because some poof big bang cant just ahppen and lfie cant be happen out of nothing. YET THEY SAY A ALL POWERFULL GOD JUST POOFED INTO BEING AND POOFED EVERYTHING INTO BEING......Weird.

[FREE SERVANT]

macumazahn wrote:

<quoted text>And yet that generation, and many since, did...

But the Pharisees and Sadducees and those who they represented will not pass from the earth till all those things will be fulfilled. John the Baptist caused contention when he spoke of them in Matthew 3:7.

[Bad case of Romnesia]

The T-Rex was a shrinky dink ? Wow ! That's alot of very cold water. ;P

[FREE SERVANT]

The original language must have been like Hebrew and Noah and his descendants spoke it until it was scattered and scrambled by the LORD to confound and confuse them so they could not understand one anothers speech. The evidence for the city and tower built with brick will be found in Iraq in a plain which used to be called Shinar.

[Tissue dspenser]

When did the dinosaurs exist ? Haven't got an answer yet.....

[ToManyLaws]

Tissue dspenser wrote:

When did the dinosaurs exist ? Haven't got an answer yet.....

Around a million years or more ago. Go look it up.

[Awake]

Everyone seems to be ignoring the new interventionist theory. As far fetched as it may seem at first, there seems to be better evidence of its plausability than evolution.
Perhaps you're not aware? See the work of Loyd Pye
on youtube.

[Awake]

The Dinosaurs were here around 50 million years ago.
Michael Tellinger has found a site in Mpumalanga which could be the site of the origins of man around 400,000 years ago. See his book 'Slave Gods of Africa'
The Garden of Eden refers to Sumeria almost 6000 years ago Which was the beginning of our Civilisation. See the work of Zacharia Sitchin.

[Kong_]

Awake wrote:

Everyone seems to be ignoring the new interventionist theory. As far fetched as it may seem at first, there seems to be better evidence of its plausability than evolution.
Perhaps you're not aware? See the work of Loyd Pye
on youtube.

"Interventionist Theory"?!?!

What a steaming pile of crap you've just dumped here!

From the "official website": http://www.lloydpye.com/intervention/AlienLif...

"Alien Intervention
Intervention theory began in 1968 with the publication of Erich Von Daniken’s Chariots of the Gods. Von Daniken focused on the wide array of megalithic structures around the world that so obviously are beyond modern capacities to match. Surely, he argued, only intervention by non-human, off-world entities could explain how such immense structures could be built to tolerances that today’s engineers can only marvel at. One favorite quote is that the Pyramids are “Rolex watches built on a scale of small mountains,” as are Baalbek in Lebanon, Tiahuanaco in Bolivia, and Sachsahuaman and Ollantaytambo in Peru, among dozens of monuments less cyclopean in size but no more likely to have been created by the minds and muscles of ordinary humans."

There's more to read if you want to get a giggle <<website above>>

[Awake]

Science and religion should be in agreement on the facts, unfortunately they are both crippled by Politics and Finance. Teachers have their own agenda and save the good stuff for themselves.