So your argument is that the world does not change. And if it does, it's towards corruption and sin.If we are scientific we need to show that evolution is even probable. It is NOT and stories are made up to explain the supposed transitions between species. Science is concerned about knowing the details and if you leave out most the details you do not have science.
"New function has been observed to evolve."
Evolutionists assume that "new function" can evolve but how do they not know that it is the robustness that is programmed into life to keep it existing? Or is it the genetic variation that exists in a species - preprogrammed information to allow a species to adapt to changing environments. The problem here is that this COULD be evidence for design but evolutionist hijack it and claim it for evolution. Again to prove evolution they need to show that it actually is new and not pre-programmed into the cell.
Perhaps you could explain why tuberculosis still exists and some strains are resistant to the old antibiotics? Work of Satan?