“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Level 4

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

#925 Jan 23, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text> Did other business for years with a lady labor and delivery docter....she told me once, that her malpractise insurance had gotten so high, she just had $100,000 in a seperate bank account, in case she got sued.....she said, that is why many docter's now refuse to deliver babies.....
That problem isnít limited to the delivery of babies. People will claim injury from treatment in hopes of hitting a jackpot. That costs you, me and everyone else a lot of money.

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Level 4

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

#926 Jan 23, 2013
milwaukee69 wrote:
<quoted text>
Too late - the fat Nazis in NYC have already tried.
They succeeded in banning trans fats.

“I know where you are,”

Level 8

Since: Jun 08

Right here under my thumb

#927 Jan 23, 2013
eternal cynic wrote:
<quoted text>
They succeeded in banning trans fats.
I knew it!!!

What's next?

Banning our right to have a heart attack?

Bastards...

“I know where you are,”

Level 8

Since: Jun 08

Right here under my thumb

#928 Jan 23, 2013
eternal cynic wrote:
<quoted text>
That problem isnít limited to the delivery of babies. People will claim injury from treatment in hopes of hitting a jackpot. That costs you, me and everyone else a lot of money.
Malpractice and civil suits, in all honesty, have been driving the cost of health insurance premiums up long before Obama has been president.
Question

United States

#929 Jan 23, 2013
milwaukee69 wrote:
<quoted text>
I knew it!!!
What's next?
Banning our right to have a heart attack?
Bastards...
Did you attend debate school with Ferrerman by any chance?

“I know where you are,”

Level 8

Since: Jun 08

Right here under my thumb

#930 Jan 23, 2013
Question wrote:
<quoted text>Did you attend debate school with Ferrerman by any chance?
Helen?

Helen Keller?

Is it really you?
Agree

United States

#931 Jan 23, 2013
milwaukee69 wrote:
<quoted text>
Malpractice and civil suits, in all honesty, have been driving the cost of health insurance premiums up long before Obama has been president.
But the Dems will never address tort reform because the trial lawyers are one of their biggest contributors, perhaps trumped only by unions. If frivolous suits were dramatically reduced and insurance made available across state lines, we wouldn't have any need for "The Affordable Care Act", which will perversely have the exact opposite effect on healthcare while driving down the quality. It's not about health and it's not about care. It's about CONTROL, and since healthcare is 1/6th of the US economy, well, you know.

Level 7

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#932 Jan 23, 2013
eternal cynic wrote:
<quoted text>
That problem isnít limited to the delivery of babies. People will claim injury from treatment in hopes of hitting a jackpot. That costs you, me and everyone else a lot of money.
I think that is why we need to pressure Congress into passing Tort Reform....Limiting how much damage, lawyers can do....
Devils Advocate

Rochester, NY

#933 Jan 23, 2013
I'm sure that the acts of treason and consolidation of power by Obama will be well rewarded. The American People that survive will all adore and worship him, or else. Rome fell in a similar way.
Agree

United States

#934 Jan 23, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text>I think that is why we need to pressure Congress into passing Tort Reform....Limiting how much damage, lawyers can do....
Do you think Harry Reid would even contemplate pushing that through? Not if your life depended upon it. Trial lawyers are in the Dem's pockets. And all of ours.

Level 7

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#935 Jan 23, 2013
Agree wrote:
<quoted text>Do you think Harry Reid would even contemplate pushing that through? Not if your life depended upon it. Trial lawyers are in the Dem's pockets. And all of ours.
They will eventually....if you recall, they never wanted to push through the bill, outlawing their investing with insider information....till 60 Minutes and public pressure forced them to do the right thing....

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#936 Jan 23, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text>I think that is why we need to pressure Congress into passing Tort Reform....Limiting how much damage, lawyers can do....
Gotta disagree, my friend. It is corporations that want to limit their liability. That's what is the crux of 'tort reform'. Someone cited the "Hot Coffee" case from McDonalds. Good ol' Karl Rove was in on trying to get the word out that the old woman who was so grotesquely disfigured was some money-grubbing, greedy, scam artist. Truth was, McDonalds was putting out an unsafe product. Common sense would say you don't sell 120 degree coffee without at least alerting people that they are buying a very dangerous product. I know all the usual suspect, conservative experts will be screaming "PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY!!!!" as if someone had just poured Micky D's coffee on their crotch but,the reality is, if they were so hurt or disabled for life (or a child/spouse/etc.) by some corporate or medical negligence, I bet they wouldn't want damages set at a fiscally conservative flat rate of $250,000 when they're maybe looking at a child's LIFETIME as a quadriplegic. That is what the corporations want out of tort reform. That is why they single out the more high-profile cases and muddy the waters there as if everyone was getting tens of millions every time they sued.
Fence Post

Rochester, NY

#937 Jan 23, 2013
Just between you and me, Obama is a jerk! And his policies suck.

Level 8

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#938 Jan 23, 2013
The ACLU has sued and won the right for sex offenders to not be banned from Facebook and other social media. Isn't the President going to protect our children from this, or does it not further any of his agenda to do so?

“....VETS”

Level 9

Since: Jan 08

WELCOME HOME

#939 Jan 23, 2013
Naughtyrobot wrote:
The ACLU has sued and won the right for sex offenders to not be banned from Facebook and other social media. Isn't the President going to protect our children from this, or does it not further any of his agenda to do so?
why don't you be a parent and protect your children and supervise them.. government isn't your babysitter even though he is your UNCLE and why are children on facebook

“If it ain't broke don't fix it”

Level 9

Since: Jul 09

Arcadia, LA.

#940 Jan 23, 2013
tallyho wrote:
<quoted text>
why don't you be a parent and protect your children and supervise them.. government isn't your babysitter even though he is your UNCLE and why are children on facebook
But it's okay for the government to protect children from "guns"?

“....VETS”

Level 9

Since: Jan 08

WELCOME HOME

#941 Jan 23, 2013
dragoon70056 wrote:
<quoted text>
But it's okay for the government to protect children from "guns"?
the government tries to protect all from guns , was their a point I missed ????.... but being a parent is a great start to protect your children

Level 8

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#942 Jan 23, 2013
tallyho wrote:
<quoted text>
why don't you be a parent and protect your children and supervise them.. government isn't your babysitter even though he is your UNCLE and why are children on facebook
I do, but these social media sites are a stalking ground for predators. Rapists and pedephiles use them to find victims and should be banned for life from going on them. But banning guns used in a small percentage of crimes gets the full force and might of the Presidency. We are losing jobs and the economy is tanking, but Obama makes "gay transgender equality" the top prioity. Massassachets Judge finds in favor of a prisoner, the state must pay near a million dollars for the prisoner's sex change operation- this is where the Liberal left is leading us.

Level 8

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#943 Jan 23, 2013
California has the most extreme gun control laws in the country, crime is out of control there. They are releasing prisoners early due to extreme overcrowding. They are doubling down and trying to pass even more gun control. Crime is going to get worse. So, it has failed there, but the Prez wants to take failure and try in nationally. Stupid.

Level 8

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#944 Jan 23, 2013
Obama-care, guess what, many employers have announced they will be lying off full time workers and hiring only part time employees, because healthcare will be too expensive under Obama-care. Thanks, thanks alot.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Truck containing 36,000 pounds of Crisco stolen 2 min dragoon70056 19
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 3 min Charles Idemi 120,772
During Obama's Speech at Democratic Campaign Ra... 5 min dragoon70056 13
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 10 min Crazy Beautiful 148,944
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 20 min Sublime1 22,214
CHANGE One letter CHANCE (Sep '08) 23 min Truths 29,492
10,000th Post WINS 4.0 (Apr '12) 24 min Truths 5,076
Do you have a Topix crush? (Jun '11) 1 hr Crazy Beautiful 6,826
Name a smell you love to smell! (Jan '14) 2 hr dragoon70056 511
True or False Game 3 hr AmyFaith 352

Weird People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE