Again,what I said is not a matter of opinion. The _facts_ are that homophobes are now outliers. You were trying to dispute that notion here. Support for lgbt equal rights in Western democracies is at super majority percentages. Support for the more contentious marriage equality is a bit over majority percentages in the US, higher in other democracies. We know the numbers of people who think what about lgbt rights.<quoted text>
Phyllis Schlafly s Stain wrote:
1......You're confused about how many think what.
That, is a matter of opinion.
Those are facts.
The thread was going along in a joking way until some rube began weeping because he has been stopped by his parole officer - or some imaginary force - from using the words "gay" and "rainbow" as he wishes to.
The poor dear. He should move to Uganda or some other homophobes' paradise on earth.
I replied to his idiocy; homophobes don't like being called out on their nonsense. Too bad.
Also, you didn't acknowledge your complete inability to understand what an "if" statement is. If lgbt people and str8 allies tried for laws barring fundies and tee baggrz from marriage, adoption, military service, employment protections _then_ there would be some ambiguity as to who the bigots are. There is not such ambiguity.
Now, if ignorant mouthbreathers can't learn which way is up, what a bigot is, what homophobia is, what climate change is, what carbon dating is...then perhaps we will have to start limiting their rights to marry and adopt, etc. I mean, what else is to be done with such anti rational morons?