Australia's State of the Climate: Extreme Heat Levels Rising, South Australia Drying Up

Mar 4, 2014 Full story: International Business Times

A helicopter dumps water on a bushfire burning near houses in the Grampians bushland in the southeastern Australian state of Victoria, about 300 km west of Melbourne, January 17, 2014.

Full Story
trev

Geelong, Australia

#1 Mar 4, 2014
Former Greenpeace co-founder Dr Patrick Moore attacks the global warming faith in testimony to the US Senate:


There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100 years. If there were such a proof it would be written down for all to see....

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) states:“It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century."…

The IPCC defines “extremely likely” as a “95-100% probability”. But upon further examination it is clear that these numbers are not the result of any mathematical calculation or statistical analysis. They have been “invented” as a construct within the IPCC report to express “expert judgment”, as determined by the IPCC contributors.

These judgments are based, almost entirely, on the results of sophisticated computer models designed to predict the future of global climate. As noted by many observers, including Dr. Freeman Dyson of the Princeton Institute for Advanced Studies, a computer model is not a crystal ball…

The IPCC states that humans are the dominant cause of warming “since the mid-20th century”, which is 1950. From 1910 to 1940 there was an increase in global average temperature of 0.5°C over that 30-year period. Then there was a 30-year “pause” until 1970. This was followed by an increase of 0.57°C during the 30-year period from 1970 to 2000. Since then there has been no increase, perhaps a slight decrease, in average global temperature. This in itself tends to negate the validity of the computer models, as CO2 emissions have continued to accelerate during this time.

The increase in temperature between 1910-1940 was virtually identical to the increase between 1970-2000. Yet the IPCC does not attribute the increase from 1910- 1940 to “human influence.” They are clear in their belief that human emissions impact only the increase “since the mid-20th century”. Why does the IPCC believe that a virtually identical increase in temperature after 1950 is caused mainly by “human influence”, when it has no explanation for the nearly identical increase from 1910- 1940?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weather Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Michelle Grossman - About NBC 10 News Story - W... (Mar '08) 9 min RamapoU 495
The BIZARRE reasons why men rape in India 29 min pit 1,073
The Fed's next land fight: New Mexico ranchers ... (May '14) 8 hr another 26
Russian ruble extends losses 9 hr Just a guy 64
Lake Effect Snow and Bitter Cold Air 9 hr larry 2
Protective Coatings, Decorative Paints and Coat... 13 hr Gerald Vonberger 1
Weird weather lingers in Alaska's largest city 20 hr Pope Bennie s Closet 1
More from around the web