Excuse #9: NASA Scientist Says 17-year Pause in Global Warming Just 'Coincidence'

Feb 28, 2014 Full story: NewsLI.com 36

Climate scientists have put forward the ninth major explanation for the 17-year pause in global warming: it's just a coincidence.

Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Ralph

Bloomingdale, IN

#24 Mar 2, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
Wy yes, a a flightless bird that no longer exists. I also carry two birds with me, which sometimes are visible in traffic.
Cordwainer Trout

Leitchfield, KY

#25 Mar 2, 2014
More absolute proof of data tampering at the highest levels of what these global warming Nazis call a scientific community...

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/data-tamp...
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#26 Mar 2, 2014
cold dead fish wrote:
You are nothing but a denier.
Denying watts, who has been denying for 2 decades, ain't denying. He's been shuffling temperature stations for years. Now for the 3rd time(?), he thinks he has "got fish on"........ certainly, a "cold dead fish".
Cordwainer Trout

Leitchfield, KY

#27 Mar 2, 2014
"The gw crowd and their trolls do not have one piece of empirical evidence linking human activities to the climate NOT ONE! All they have is untraceable weather anecdotes, computer projections which never pan out, and Hockey Stick FrankenGraphs cobbled together with unrelated, unreliable proxy data sets."

Charles S. Opalek, PE
Ralph

Bloomingdale, IN

#28 Mar 2, 2014
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
"The gw crowd and their trolls do not have one piece of empirical evidence linking human activities to the climate NOT ONE! All they have is untraceable weather anecdotes, computer projections which never pan out, and Hockey Stick FrankenGraphs cobbled together with unrelated, unreliable proxy data sets."
Charles S. Opalek, PE
Do away with CO2, and plants and trees die. This could not be all about money, and allowing pollution for dollars, could it?
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#29 Mar 2, 2014
ralph-malph wrote:
Do away with CO2
No AGW science or any AGW advocate has ever stated to do away with CO2. But scaredy cat silly touched touchy toxic topix AGW deniers have always said that is what AGW advocates want. Truly, scaredy cat silly touched touchy toxic topix AGW deniers have no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc in their poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.
Rambeaux

Philadelphia, PA

#30 Mar 2, 2014
Climate change? I prefer to call them seasons; y'know like winter, spring, summer, and autumn. Same as it ever was.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#32 Mar 3, 2014
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
Absolute proof of the highest levels of the global warming Nazi community's using subterfuge, falsehoods and rewriting the past to continue their scams on the world in collusion with political agendas written of and debated in the 1970s by Marxists squabbling about using environmental issues to keep control of the waning Vietnam era cowards and traitors... check out their heady discussions in Ramparts magazine of that era, as it was nearing its publication end.
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/02/2...
Steven Goddard is the high priest of the cult of stupid, and his stupidity is spread around the internet by his minions like troutbrain.

The reason the 1940s peak was removed? At that time sea temperature measurement changed from bucket and line to measuring the temperature of engine room intake water. The spike was an artefact of this.

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut4/H...

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#33 Mar 3, 2014
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
More absolute proof of data tampering at the highest levels of what these global warming Nazis call a scientific community...
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/data-tamp...
More from the high priest of stupid.

The US temperature data is adjusted because there are changes in the way the data is recorded: for example, the time of day of measurement. Different times of day are warmer or cooler, so these adjustments must be made. It's not a conspiracy to make them, it would be stupid not to.

http://rankexploits.com/musings/2012/a-surpri...

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/...

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#34 Mar 3, 2014
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
"The gw crowd and their trolls do not have one piece of empirical evidence linking human activities to the climate NOT ONE! All they have is untraceable weather anecdotes, computer projections which never pan out, and Hockey Stick FrankenGraphs cobbled together with unrelated, unreliable proxy data sets."
Charles S. Opalek, PE
The cult of stupid will not let its members look at the evidence.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evi...

They are only allowed to get their information from cult sources.
Cordwainer Trout

Leitchfield, KY

#35 Mar 3, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
More from the high priest of stupid.
The US temperature data is adjusted because there are changes in the way the data is recorded: for example, the time of day of measurement. Different times of day are warmer or cooler, so these adjustments must be made. It's not a conspiracy to make them, it would be stupid not to.
http://rankexploits.com/musings/2012/a-surpri...
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/...
If what you claim was true, there would be representations of temperature data adjustments both up and down. However, the adjustments noted and thoroughly discussed, are ALL in the same direction, that direction being what supports the fictitious claim of AGW. It's so obviously rigged, you have to be a liar to claim otherwise.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#36 Mar 3, 2014
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
<quoted text>
If what you claim was true, there would be representations of temperature data adjustments both up and down. However, the adjustments noted and thoroughly discussed, are ALL in the same direction, that direction being what supports the fictitious claim of AGW. It's so obviously rigged, you have to be a liar to claim otherwise.
That would only be true if changes to the time of day of observation were made at random.

The change was not random, it was systematic, hence you would expect the adjustment to be in one direction.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#39 Mar 3, 2014
Hickbilly wrote:
Cordwanger trout has it right.
Cord wanging? Isn't that what killed David Carradine?
Rambeaux

Philadelphia, PA

#40 Mar 3, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
That would only be true if changes to the time of day of observation were made at random.
The change was not random, it was systematic, hence you would expect the adjustment to be in one direction.
You mean like one step forward and two steps back?
Ralph

Bloomingdale, IN

#41 Mar 3, 2014
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
No AGW science or any AGW advocate has ever stated to do away with CO2. But scaredy cat silly touched touchy toxic topix AGW deniers have always said that is what AGW advocates want. Truly, scaredy cat silly touched touchy toxic topix AGW deniers have no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc in their poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.
It is nice that momma wet the widdle one play on the puter. Tell mommie Russian scientists state that we are entering a time of global cooling. Good luck to the widdle ones stopping vocanic eruption, and the compressed CO2 underground from erupting. Maybe the methane ice structures will erupt also.
Excuse me while I purchase some Apple stock just to piss off the company.
Maybe when I grow up I can be as bright as baby.
Ralph

Bloomingdale, IN

#42 Mar 3, 2014
jewrab wrote:
These same global warming green nazis love nuclear power because it's "zero emissions"....Chernobyl is zero emissions and Fukashima sure is zero...no emissions what so ever right?
Imigine losing power to a zero emission nuclear power plant. Chernobyl's for everyone!!!!!!!!!
Think EMP.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weather Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
US must take lead on sea level rise 1 hr SpaceBlues 2
Storm bad, but it could've been worse 2 hr DPW Directer 18
How many degrees below zero was Alabama's colde... 5 hr icthelite 1
The tire experts encourage you to get a head st... 6 hr Deep chill weekend 1
Deep chill expected in Halton this weekend 6 hr Mom 1
Region issues weekend Cold Alert 6 hr other chills 1
Climate change will make storms nastier but les... 13 hr America 1
More from around the web