Story of the Year: It's Global Warming, Stupid

[hissie hissie]

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>

In truth, most toxic topix AGW deniers never could attack, except for their slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pigisms &/or alleged & proud threats.

Your argument sure does have science, facts and logic beat.

You are the schoolyard pundit!

[PHD]

I disagree they wouldn't allow "pinheadlitesout in a school yard.

[tina anne]

Fair Game wrote:

<quoted text>
Glad you acknowledge that.

Actually, I said that they discuss science fiction. Then again you have been showing signs of being in distress.

So are you ready to admit that AGW=science fiction.

[Fair Game]

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, I said that they discuss science.

You are quite right, they do.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/

[PHD]

All science eventually becomes science fiction.

[tina anne]

Fair Game wrote:

<quoted text>
You are quite right, they do.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/

Trimming my words to fit your beliefs. Just like you love to do with the facts.

The funny thing is that you only seem to have one or two sources left with your favorite being run by a physics grad who was considered so loony that he could not get a job in the field. Imagine someone so bad he was considered to loony to be working for Dr Hansen at NASA or Dr Mann at Penn State.

[PHD]

They are all in error. More science fiction.

[Wallop10]

PHD wrote:

All science eventually becomes science fiction.

That would be your version of science, which is pseudoscience.

[tina anne]

Wallop10 wrote:

<quoted text>
That would be your version of science, which is pseudoscience.

Which would be a excellent description of Dr Hansen's and Dr Mann's work.

[litesong]

phud fetid feces face wrote:

All science eventually becomes science fiction.

Not good science fiction, unless science fiction can stay ahead of the science.
There was a 1955 science fiction movie that portrayed a landing on the moon, 145 years later in the year 2100. Astronauts were picked by NASA in 1957, Pres. Kennedy started the program to land a man on the moon in 1961, & the U.S. landed people on the moon in 1969, 14 years AFTER the movie.

Wasn't a very good sci-fi movie.

[Where]

Where's Al Gore?

[PHD]

pinheadlitesout wrote:

<quoted text>
Not good science fiction, unless science fiction can stay ahead of the "pinheadlitesout" ME.
There was a 1955 science fiction movie that portrayed a landing on the moon, 145 years later in the year 2100. Astronauts were picked by NASA in 1957, Pres. Kennedy started the program to land a man on the moon in 1961, & the U.S. landed people on the moon in 1969, 14 years AFTER the movie.
Wasn't a very good sci-fi movie.

The only science fiction here is your useless babble cut and paste hot air.Did you get that check up from the neck up?

[fred]

:)

[PHD]

No folks the" pinheadlites out did NOT get that check up from the neck up recommended after that terrible car crash it boasted about.You know what happens when you bump your noggin"pinheadlitesout ".

[Wallop10]

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
Which would be a excellent description of Dr Hansen's and Dr Mann's work.

Are you aware they are considered the top scientists by something like 95% of tje scientific community.

You are in right wing la la land. Do you also think evolution is evil? Roy Spencer is a Creationist (and right wing libertarian), you know...

So it fits with him...

[Wallop10]

PHD wrote:

<quoted text>The only science fiction here is your useless babble cut and paste hot air.Did you get that check up from the neck up?

I see our local troll keeps spouting the same garbage. Truly a low IQ guy.

[PHD]

TROLLWallop10 wrote:

<quoted text>
I see I'm the local troll keeps spouting the same garbage.I I'm Truly a low IQ guy.

Ok we already know.

[tina anne]

Wallop10 wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you aware they are considered the top scientists by something like 95% of tje scientific community.
You are in right wing la la land. Do you also think evolution is evil? Roy Spencer is a Creationist (and right wing libertarian), you know...
So it fits with him...

Considered by who to be the top scientist. There are some who consider Dr Mann for example to be a fraud and have tried to take him to court over some of his nonsense.

The real fact is that most of the debate about climate change is really a political and not a scientific one. Even your calling it a quote, "RW la la land", just proves the point that what Dr Hansen and Mann are engaged in is less about science and more about politics.

[SpaceBlues]

Mann was brought up in Amherst, Massachusetts, where his father was a professor of mathematics at the University of Massachusetts (UMass). At school he was interested in math, science and computing. In 1983 he was prompted by seeing the film WarGames to write a rudimentary self-learning tic-tac-toe program which made random moves and listed losing moves which it would not repeat. Mann found a "trick" of using symmetry to reduce the number of unique moves to store so that the computer would not slow down so much.[3]

In August 1984 he went to the University of California, Berkeley, to major in physics with a second major in applied math. His second year research in the theoretical behaviour of liquid crystals used the Monte Carlo method applying randomness in computer simulations. Late in 1987 he joined a research team under Didier de Fontaine which was using similar Monte Carlo methodology to investigate the superconducting properties of yttrium barium copper oxide, modelling transitions between ordered and disordered phases.[4] He graduated with honors in 1989 with an A.B. in applied mathematics and physics.[1]

[Proudly copied and pasted from Wikipedia.]

[Fair Game]

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
There are some who consider Dr Mann for example to be a fraud and have tried to take him to court over some of his nonsense.

You have it the wrong way round. Mann has taken somebody who called him a fraud to court in a libel case. And is going to win of course, because no evidence of wrongdoing has ever been produced.