Story of the Year: It's Global Warming, Stupid

Dec 31, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Common Dreams

My favorite headline of 2012 was " It's Global Warming, Stupid ," which appeared on the cover of Bloomberg Businessweek on Nov.

Comments (Page 7)

Showing posts 121 - 140 of324
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#138
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
A lie of course.
Half a dozen independent enquires found no evidence.
Independent? Far more inquiries found plenty of evidence.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#139
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

1

Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
A lie of course.
Sceptikal Science and RealClimate discuss the scientific literature.
Wattsupmybum discusses any nonsense that seems to contradict AGW, however scientifically nonsensical, and attacks real climate science and scientists.
Not that an agenda driven ignoramuses like you know the difference- just which side you're on.
Sure skepticalscience and Realclimate discuss scientific literature. Science fiction literature is more like it and they write a rather large portion of it. You complain about Whatsupwiththat discuesses any nonesense that contradicts AGW while ignoring the fact that many scientist have already declared AGW a dead letter. You refer to them as agenda driven ignormauses and yet RealClimate and SkepticalScience are just as much agenda driven to try and resusitate AGW dispite the weath or research that has buried it.

A lie of course. Then again for you, anything that disproves what yo believe in must be a lie because for it to be true would mean that you have believed a lie. Dispite the wealth of facts/research/data to prove that it was a lie.

RealClimate and SkepticalScience discuss facts the way that Goring discuessed them. With an agenda to advance and people to hoodwink.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#140
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually Congress has more empty chairs and a lower approval rating than cockroaches. Then again the Senate also has a lower approval rating than cockroaches.
Well I never said you were correct but you do an excellant job giving the "pinheadlitesout" and spacedoutblues a good spanking.Ahh the roaches the GOP and Blue Dogs have many.
aaaaaarghhh SCHUMER

Riverhead, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually Congress has more empty chairs and a lower approval rating than cockroaches. Then again the Senate also has a lower approval rating than cockroaches.
I would rather have my home infested with cockroaches than with Schumer and Pelosi.
litesong

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

phud feces face wrote:
you(tiny-minded anne) do an excellant(sic) job......
'tiny-minded anne' made a friend with 'phud feces face'.'phud feces face' even misspelled another of his many misspelled words, so 'tiny-minded anne' would feel at home.'tiny-minded anne' will clean the face of 'phud feces face', but not very well or often. With many toxic topix AGW deniers leaving toxic topix AGW forums because their funding dried up after romneyhood, romesia & romney who(?) lost, toxic topix AGW deniers, even tho enemies, are friending each other & circling the wagons, unable to attack anymore.

In truth, most toxic topix AGW deniers never could attack, except for their slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pigisms &/or alleged & proud threats. toxic topix AGW deniers didn't have any upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc to mount any arguments against scientists that had 10-16 years more mathematics & science training than toxic topix AGW deniers chose to have.
litesong

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#143
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

tiny-minded anne wrote:
Am I confused........
Yes.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#144
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure skepticalscience and Realclimate discuss scientific literature.
Glad you acknowledge that.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#145
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

pinheadlitesout wrote:
<quoted text>
'tina anne' made a friend with 'PHD'.'I "pinheadlitesout' even mispelled another of his many mispelled words, so 'tina- anne' would feel at home.'tiny anne' wouldn't clean the face of 'MY "pinheadlitesout" feces face'. With many toxic topix AGW deniers like me leaving toxic topix AGW forums because MY funding dried up after romneyhood, romesia & romney who(?) lost, toxic topix AGW deniers, even MY enemies, are friending each other & circling the wagons,om me I'm unable to attack anymore.
In truth, most toxic topix AGW deniers like ME never could attack, except for their slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pigisms &/or alleged & proud threats. toxic topix AGW deniers like ME didn't have any upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc to mount any arguments against scientists or science that had 10-16 months more mathematics & science training than toxic topix AGW I "pinheadlitesout denier chose to have.
Well there you have it folks the only truth "pinheadlitesout" Above has ever posted.
hissie hissie

Riverhead, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

litesong wrote:
<quoted text>

In truth, most toxic topix AGW deniers never could attack, except for their slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pigisms &/or alleged & proud threats.
Your argument sure does have science, facts and logic beat.

You are the schoolyard pundit!
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#147
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

I disagree they wouldn't allow "pinheadlitesout in a school yard.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Glad you acknowledge that.
Actually, I said that they discuss science fiction. Then again you have been showing signs of being in distress.

So are you ready to admit that AGW=science fiction.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I said that they discuss science.
You are quite right, they do.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

1

All science eventually becomes science fiction.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#151
Jan 15, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
You are quite right, they do.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
Trimming my words to fit your beliefs. Just like you love to do with the facts.

The funny thing is that you only seem to have one or two sources left with your favorite being run by a physics grad who was considered so loony that he could not get a job in the field. Imagine someone so bad he was considered to loony to be working for Dr Hansen at NASA or Dr Mann at Penn State.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#152
Jan 15, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

They are all in error. More science fiction.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#153
Jan 15, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

PHD wrote:
All science eventually becomes science fiction.
That would be your version of science, which is pseudoscience.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
That would be your version of science, which is pseudoscience.
Which would be a excellent description of Dr Hansen's and Dr Mann's work.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

phud fetid feces face wrote:
All science eventually becomes science fiction.
Not good science fiction, unless science fiction can stay ahead of the science.
There was a 1955 science fiction movie that portrayed a landing on the moon, 145 years later in the year 2100. Astronauts were picked by NASA in 1957, Pres. Kennedy started the program to land a man on the moon in 1961, & the U.S. landed people on the moon in 1969, 14 years AFTER the movie.

Wasn't a very good sci-fi movie.
Where

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#156
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Where's Al Gore?
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#157
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

pinheadlitesout wrote:
<quoted text>
Not good science fiction, unless science fiction can stay ahead of the "pinheadlitesout" ME.
There was a 1955 science fiction movie that portrayed a landing on the moon, 145 years later in the year 2100. Astronauts were picked by NASA in 1957, Pres. Kennedy started the program to land a man on the moon in 1961, & the U.S. landed people on the moon in 1969, 14 years AFTER the movie.
Wasn't a very good sci-fi movie.
The only science fiction here is your useless babble cut and paste hot air.Did you get that check up from the neck up?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 121 - 140 of324
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••