NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo Proposes 'Toughe...

NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo Proposes 'Toughest Assault Weapon Ban in the Nation'

There are 189 comments on the 760 WJR story from Jan 9, 2013, titled NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo Proposes 'Toughest Assault Weapon Ban in the Nation'. In it, 760 WJR reports that:

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo laid out a plan Wednesday to give his state some of the strictest gun control laws in the country.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at 760 WJR.

Jumper50

Troy, NY

#108 Jan 19, 2013
De Opresssor Liber wrote:
<quoted text>
Why shouldn't I be allowed to own a flamethrower and mortar? After all, more people are killed every year during rough sex than by flamethrowers. I suppose you think we should ban rough sex?
I have rights, you know. It's my God-given right to own a flamethrower and mortar, and I don't have to give you a reason, because its in the Constitution.
In the United States, private ownership of a flamethrower is not restricted by federal law, but is restricted in some states, such as California, by state laws (cf. California Health and Welfare Codes 12750–12761, Flamethrowing Devices).

In California, unlicensed possession of a flame-throwing device—statutorily defined as "any non-stationary and transportable device designed or intended to emit or propel a burning stream of combustible or flammable liquid a distance of at least 10 feet" H&W 12750 (a)—is a misdemeanor punishable with a county jail term not exceeding one year OR with a fine not exceeding $10,000 (CA H&W 12761). Licenses to use flamethrowers are issued by the State Fire Marshal, and he or she may use any criteria for issuing or not issuing that license that he deems fit, but must publish those criteria in the California Code of Regulations, Title 11, Section 970 et seq

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#109 Jan 19, 2013
Jumper50 wrote:
<quoted text> In the United States, private ownership of a flamethrower is not restricted by federal law, but is restricted in some states, such as California, by state laws (cf. California Health and Welfare Codes 12750–12761, Flamethrowing Devices).
In California, unlicensed possession of a flame-throwing device—statutorily defined as "any non-stationary and transportable device designed or intended to emit or propel a burning stream of combustible or flammable liquid a distance of at least 10 feet" H&W 12750 (a)—is a misdemeanor punishable with a county jail term not exceeding one year OR with a fine not exceeding $10,000 (CA H&W 12761). Licenses to use flamethrowers are issued by the State Fire Marshal, and he or she may use any criteria for issuing or not issuing that license that he deems fit, but must publish those criteria in the California Code of Regulations, Title 11, Section 970 et seq
WTF is wrong is you?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#110 Jan 19, 2013
acidic wrote:
I just saw the most retarded post ever on the topic.....actually calling the NRA a racist organization ....way to play the race card, el douche... Liber ! It won't work. Nobama , raised by his grandmama .......ain't got a chance in haitis to take away our second amendment .....we need to fight back and get the truest meaning enforced. No reason why I should not have access to whatever weapons I can afford so long as I am not a criminal.
Look, if you need a big, high-capacity gun to make up for a little weenie...got for it!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#111 Jan 19, 2013
I'll be that your AR-15 is the only thing in your house that doesn't shoot blanks!

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#112 Jan 19, 2013
obarna vomit wrote:
I'll be that your AR-15 is the only thing in your house that doesn't shoot blanks!
LOL, most people who own AR15s, don't just own one, diptard.
Jumper50

Troy, NY

#113 Jan 19, 2013
obarna vomit wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF is wrong is you?
Just answering your Misinformation Again
check

Santa Fe, NM

#114 Jan 19, 2013
acidic wrote:
I just saw the most retarded post ever on the topic.....actually calling the NRA a racist organization
.
the demographics. Read the posts here.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#115 Jan 19, 2013
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>LOL, most people who own AR15s, don't just own one, diptard.
Why would you need more than one AR-15? You don't even need one!
Wow...a person's dick would have to be pretty small for them to need TWO AR's!!!!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#116 Jan 19, 2013
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>LOL, most people who own AR15s, don't just own one, diptard.
I didn't know that, probably because I don't subscribe to "Paranoid Mental-Case Quarterly".

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#117 Jan 19, 2013
acidic wrote:
I just saw the most retarded post ever on the topic.....actually calling the NRA a racist organization ....way to play the race card, el douche... Liber ! It won't work. Nobama , raised by his grandmama .......ain't got a chance in haitis to take away our second amendment .....we need to fight back and get the truest meaning enforced. No reason why I should not have access to whatever weapons I can afford so long as I am not a criminal.
Wow...what were they thinking? I can imagine that the NRA would be racist in any way..it's just doesn't seem to fit the mold.

I mean, an organization that is about 99% white and largely southern men racist?
Larry

Stowe, VT

#118 Jan 19, 2013
Obama Vomit, just what do you have against guns?

You seem to feel that if you don't like guns, nobody shown any gun you don't approve of. Why?

Have you ever fired any gun? Are you aware of the millions of gun owners who have taken safety courses?

You seem to feel you are the arbiter of what and how many guns I should own, because you don't feel we NEED a certain type or number of guns.

Do people need Cadillacs? No... We all can get down the road just fine in a Chevy.

I'm watching the Barrett-Jackson auto auction on TV and a restored 1970 Oldsmobile 442 just sold for $325,000. Cash from an evil "one percenter". Does the buyer NEED that car? No. But does he have the RIGHT to own it? Yes. Just as I have every RIGHT to own my Bushmaster and Colt as well as my other firearms.

You also have the RIGHT to say what you do, no matter how offensive you are.

I believe it was Jefferson who said the government should always fear the people. When the people fear the government it's tyranny.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#119 Jan 19, 2013
Larry wrote:
Obama Vomit, just what do you have against guns?
You seem to feel that if you don't like guns, nobody shown any gun you don't approve of. Why?
Have you ever fired any gun? Are you aware of the millions of gun owners who have taken safety courses?
You seem to feel you are the arbiter of what and how many guns I should own, because you don't feel we NEED a certain type or number of guns.
Do people need Cadillacs? No... We all can get down the road just fine in a Chevy.
I'm watching the Barrett-Jackson auto auction on TV and a restored 1970 Oldsmobile 442 just sold for $325,000. Cash from an evil "one percenter". Does the buyer NEED that car? No. But does he have the RIGHT to own it? Yes. Just as I have every RIGHT to own my Bushmaster and Colt as well as my other firearms.
You also have the RIGHT to say what you do, no matter how offensive you are.
I believe it was Jefferson who said the government should always fear the people. When the people fear the government it's tyranny.
Let me clue you in on something, junior; I've owned more guns in my lifetime than you'll ever buy. I'm a 1,000 yard club shooter and a distinguished expert marksman. I shoot trap, skeet and combat.

I saw this situation coming about 12 years ago, when the ranges became populated with morons carrying AK-47's. To a man, these were the idiots on the ranges. I knew right then and there what we (gun owners) were in trouble. Then came the AR-15's...all tricked out and stupid. The NRA had changed from an organization which promoted safe, responsible gun-ownership to a lobbyist for the gun manufacturers.

When mainstream America asks you why you need an AR-15, you tell them "because it's my right"...and that's a stupid response, because that's not why you "need" the weapon...it's why you think you should be able to buy it... so mainstream America reacts by saying "get rid of these un-necessary guns".

When mainstream America asks you why you need an AR-15, and you tell them that it is to protect you from a tyrannical government...they automatically see you as Branch Davidians...and they say "get rid of the un-necessary guns".

One of your biggest problems is that most of you who own assault weapons come off as morons on the six o'clock news.

Now, politicians rely on mainstream America, so they react.

I don't hate guns... I hate morons who jeopardize my gun rights because they're stupid and live in a fantasy-world where "fair" counts. I hate simple-minded idiots who think that they have "rights" that can't be taken away. I hate childish men who play soldier and put a negative face on American gun ownership. I hate paranoid fools who think that their .223 is going to hold off a Chinese invasion or save them in the event of atonal chaos.

You want someone to blame for increased gun control? Go get your AR-15 and look in the mirror...because after Newtown, that's what pure evil looks like to many Americans, and you only have yourselves to blame.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#120 Jan 19, 2013
Seriously.. watch the rally in Albany, NY today...count how many were big fat slobs who look like they couldn't pass the G.E.D. with a 30 point gift.
sheepleloveroyal ty

Bryn Mawr, PA

#121 Jan 19, 2013
obarna vomit wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me clue you in on something, junior; I've owned more guns in my lifetime than you'll ever buy. I'm a 1,000 yard club shooter and a distinguished expert marksman. I shoot trap, skeet and combat.
I saw this situation coming about 12 years ago, when the ranges became populated with morons carrying AK-47's. To a man, these were the idiots on the ranges. I knew right then and there what we (gun owners) were in trouble. Then came the AR-15's...all tricked out and stupid. The NRA had changed from an organization which promoted safe, responsible gun-ownership to a lobbyist for the gun manufacturers.
When mainstream America asks you why you need an AR-15, you tell them "because it's my right"...and that's a stupid response, because that's not why you "need" the weapon...it's why you think you should be able to buy it... so mainstream America reacts by saying "get rid of these un-necessary guns".
When mainstream America asks you why you need an AR-15, and you tell them that it is to protect you from a tyrannical government...they automatically see you as Branch Davidians...and they say "get rid of the un-necessary guns".
One of your biggest problems is that most of you who own assault weapons come off as morons on the six o'clock news.
Now, politicians rely on mainstream America, so they react.
I don't hate guns... I hate morons who jeopardize my gun rights because they're stupid and live in a fantasy-world where "fair" counts. I hate simple-minded idiots who think that they have "rights" that can't be taken away. I hate childish men who play soldier and put a negative face on American gun ownership. I hate paranoid fools who think that their .223 is going to hold off a Chinese invasion or save them in the event of atonal chaos.
You want someone to blame for increased gun control? Go get your AR-15 and look in the mirror...because after Newtown, that's what pure evil looks like to many Americans, and you only have yourselves to blame.
'look in theh mirror'

So guilt by association and/or mob rule?
sheepleloveroyal ty

Bryn Mawr, PA

#122 Jan 19, 2013
De Opresssor Liber wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmmmmm...it worked.
And that's why the agenda left continues to use emotion and/or children. They want reactionary responses.

The left is using the children especially just the way GW used the word patriot in the Patriot Act to make someone seem unpatriotic if they were against it. The left is using children among other things in the exact same manner. If you don't cry,sniffle or go ANYTHING for these children you are to be considered heartless, uncaring etc. It still comes back to knee jerk reactions/emotion.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#123 Jan 19, 2013
sheepleloveroyalty wrote:
<quoted text>
'look in theh mirror'
So guilt by association and/or mob rule?
Yes, dimwit....guilt by association. Where the f**k have you been living...The Good Ship Lollipop?

Grow up.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#124 Jan 19, 2013
sheepleloveroyalty wrote:
<quoted text>
And that's why the agenda left continues to use emotion and/or children. They want reactionary responses.
The left is using the children especially just the way GW used the word patriot in the Patriot Act to make someone seem unpatriotic if they were against it. The left is using children among other things in the exact same manner. If you don't cry,sniffle or go ANYTHING for these children you are to be considered heartless, uncaring etc. It still comes back to knee jerk reactions/emotion.
And you just figured out that politicians use emotion? What do you think the NRA has been using for years? If you dared oppose gun control, they twisted it to mean that you were un-American...They spent half of their time quoting the framers of the Constitution...you don't think that's exploiting emotion?

Seriously, you're way too dumb to carry a gun.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#125 Jan 19, 2013
The more you try to tell America to calm down about Newtown, the more they're going to get pissed off at you.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#126 Jan 19, 2013
sheepleloveroyalty wrote:
<quoted text>
And that's why the agenda left continues to use emotion and/or children. They want reactionary responses.
The left is using the children especially just the way GW used the word patriot in the Patriot Act to make someone seem unpatriotic if they were against it. The left is using children among other things in the exact same manner. If you don't cry,sniffle or go ANYTHING for these children you are to be considered heartless, uncaring etc. It still comes back to knee jerk reactions/emotion.
Bwaaaaaah! They're using dead children to elicit an emotional response from politicians and their constituents, and it's not fair.

We're the ones who are supposed to be laying down stupid rhetoric like "more people are killed with hammers than gun in America" or "guns don't kill people, people kill people"

We're the ones who are supposed to tug at the heartstrings of patriots by quoting Thomas Jefferson and by reminding people how many Americans died for our right to own guns!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#127 Jan 19, 2013
Those double-edged swords are a bitch, aren't they?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Violent Crime Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Deputy fatally shot from behind at Houston gas ... 7 hr More farts 33
News Nikki Haley calls for removal of Confederate fl... 10 hr Zionist liberal 20
News Texas Shooting Suspect Charged with Murder 11 hr Donny Brook 1
News Family speaks out in deadly South Lake Tahoe of... 11 hr Let us be real 3
News Slain WDBJ reporter's father hits senators Sat USA Today 23
News Texas Sheriff's Deputy Assassinated While Pumpi... Sat Influence farts 4
News Nashville murder suspect arrested in Honolulu Fri Joe Balls 3
More from around the web