Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks ...

Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

There are 66307 comments on the Wall Street Journal story from Mar 22, 2012, titled Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media. In it, Wall Street Journal reports that:

Social media has put the spotlight on the story Trayvon Martin , an unarmed African-American teenager who was shot to death last month by a neighborhood watch captain in Florida.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#78750 Nov 1, 2013
The Truth wrote:
The fact that Zimmerman had a gun that he was lawfully
The pedophile wasn't arrested for carrying a gun- put aside, in many states, he would not have been legally allowed to carry a gun.

He was arrested for killing an unarmed boy who's only crime was being black while walking through a bigot's neighborhood.

A juror who judged him said it best: that your pedophile got away with murder.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#78751 Nov 1, 2013
Janitor wrote:
<quoted text>
Zimmerman attacked Martin and got his butt kicked. If he had been tough enough to beat up a kid the way he beat up his old lady maybe he wouldn't have had to use his favorite phallic symbol to even the playing field when he lost the confrontation, which he started by following Martin in the first place, armed and ready to kill from the start, obviously.
Obviously, you failed to learn the entire story.

Zimmerman was going to the store that night armed as usual. He was not looking for any trouble. He stopped to do the right thing when he spotted Martin which was call the police. He ran after Martin because Martin ran first and Zimmerman thought he would do police a favor by keeping an eye on Martin's location.

How do we know this? Because Zimmerman had placed several calls to police in the past about suspicious people. Not once ever got into any altercation with them.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#78754 Nov 1, 2013
Janitor wrote:
<quoted text>
One does hear what they choose to, that we agree on. You imagined all sorts of things, obviously, to justify your belief that he was attacked after he had stopped chasing a young boy, who hadn't done anything, with a gun. And, regardless, again, if it was his wife or fiance, he was guilty, just as obviously, or the court would never have awarded his fiance the protection notice. As for the charges being reduced, it was done so that he would enter a alcoholic rehabilitation program. It was still considered a class C felony. Again, leftists seems to be anyone who disagrees with your jaded, ludicrously racists thinking. You, stuck up for Martin, oh, certainly you did. All I've seen are posts by you attacking Martian blindly because he was black. And, you couldn't possibly have given even a benefit of doubt to Martin with your all blacks are guilty because they're black attitude. I don't care what you might have made up to make it appear differently, your many posts proclaiming that all blacks were the same, all were animals who lived in squalor, had smaller brains than whites, were all leaches who lived off white society and all the rest make it quite obvious how you judge anyone with black skin.
You would make a lousy lawyer. Anybody can get a restraining order including Zimmerman which he did against his fiancee. Since they awarded Zimmerman with a restraining order, does that mean she beat up on him?????? You don't need any kind of evidence to get a restraining order. All you have to do is request one.

Yes, one does choose to hear what they hear, that's why you think Zimmerman said Fn coon. He didn't say that, but your imagination tells you he said that so you can be comforted with the nonsense that this was racial in some way.

I on the other hand have the 911 recording. Care to listen to it? I can even give you time stamps of when Zimmerman ran, when he stopped, and when his breathing returned to normal. That's not hearing what you want to hear. And if you hear differently, then you have some major problems. But if you want to listen to it, just ask, I'll post the link.

Now how much you want to bet that I stuck up for Martin when the story first came out? I'll pay ten to one odds if you want to wager.

Now for some reality:

The three incidents took place in Orange County, Fla.

In 2005, Zimmerman, then 20, was arrested and charged with “resisting officer with violence” and “battery of law enforcement officer,” both which are third-degree felonies. The charge was reduced to “resisting officer without violence” and then waived when he entered an alcohol education program. Contemporaneous accounts indicate he shoved an officer who was questioning a friend for alleged underage drinking at an Orange County bar.

In August 2005, Zimmerman’s ex-fiancee, Veronica Zuazo, filed a civil motion for a restraining order alleging domestic violence. Zimmerman counterfiled for a restraining order against Zuazo. The competing claims were resolved with both restraining orders being granted.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/03/27/10...
The Truth

Santa Clara, CA

#78755 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You care to explain why you are still going to the park to watch children even though it's a violation of your parole and it is specifically prohibited and a violation of the law, Sock Load?
PS: the only time you get to tell anyone to STFU is in your wildest fantasies - in real life, you wouldn't raise an eyebrow, you useless limp wristed ballerina or you'd be beaten in a puddle on the sidewalk.
Wipe your chin, dear.
I see you failed to quote my entire statement and reply to it. And the part you did copy, your reply has nothing to do with anything!!! That's how stupid you are.

Let's try it again..... Here's what I said for the second time...

You care to attempt to explain how doing any of those things (none of which are against the law by any stretch of the imagination) justifies Martin attacking Zimmerman?? That was the only law broken that night.

If not, shut the [email protected] up.

I suggest you either reply to the entire statement or shut the [email protected] son.
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78756 Nov 1, 2013
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>WRONG, ruth.

I mean, LIAR.

Trayvon was found guilty of NOTHING. What prosecutor charged him with what you're accusing him of?

What court has heard such case?

What jury has convicted Trayvon of what you say he's guilty of?

Tell us, LIAR. Please tell us!
Hello dimwit. Those are the charges he would have faced if he lived. Doesn't matter now. He attacked the wrong one and he will not have to worry about facing charges now. Problem solved.
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78757 Nov 1, 2013
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>The Blood of Jesus covers me from sickos like you, ruth.
Stop with your lies. Jesus frowns upon that.
The Truth

Santa Clara, CA

#78758 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The pedophile wasn't arrested for carrying a gun- put aside, in many states, he would not have been legally allowed to carry a gun.
He was arrested for killing an unarmed boy who's only crime was being black while walking through a bigot's neighborhood.
A juror who judged him said it best: that your pedophile got away with murder.
You are so stupid. Can't even quote jurors correctly. The quote of "I thought he got away with murder" was made by a juror prior to the trial when no charges were brought immediately after the event. And obviously if she thought he was guilty she would have voted that way.

Either learn to read or sit down boy.
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78759 Nov 1, 2013
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>The post where I responded to your post is #78609.

It CLEARLY shows your name "truth" right above your quote.

My response to your post was simply...
"We know. We've been known that!"

It's THAT simple, LIAR.
You're name is above your post where you admit you are ignorant. Get over it. Live with it. We all here know you are. Can't fix stupid I guess.
The Truth

Santa Clara, CA

#78760 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You care to explain why you are still going to the park to watch children even though it's a violation of your parole and it is specifically prohibited and a violation of the law, Sock Load?
PS: the only time you get to tell anyone to STFU is in your wildest fantasies - in real life, you wouldn't raise an eyebrow, you useless limp wristed ballerina or you'd be beaten in a puddle on the sidewalk.
Wipe your chin, dear.
Wow... look at that... your jungle instinct has surfaced. See boy, that's why you'll always be what you are which is nothing but a burden on society and hated by everyone that looks at you.

You seem to have the same prehistoric impulses as Martin and see how he ended up?? Someone says something you don't like and the first thing you want to do it hit me. Your daddy (assuming your mom knows which john the rubber broke on that night) must be proud.

Beat me up!!! Hahahahaa!!! Being able to beat people up stopped being cool after the 2nd grade. Unless of course you're a [email protected] ape that has no regard for the common rules of society.
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78761 Nov 1, 2013
Janitor wrote:
<quoted text>Zimmerman had some superficial skin cuts to the back of his head and his eyes didn't look very blackened to me, just puppy dog dumb and guilty. his nose wasn't broken either. And, the police lab said, though there was evidence of THC in his system, it was so small an amount that it couldn't have had any effect and obviously was ingested or smoked days earlier. You're the one who keeps talking about facts and autopsy reports. It's funny how you change them to suit your own prejudiced, animosity towards blacks, who you, like Zimmerman, declare guilty of criminal action by skin color.
You're wrong again. We are used to that. The M.E. clearly said the marijuana level was enough to effect his behavior. Zimmerman's nose was clearly broken and documented. You're either really stupid, didn't watch the trial, see the true photos of Zimmerman, or you are the ignorant racist defending a thug that was killed by someone that was the wrong color. Martin didn't like crack as either. That is what he called Zimmerman before he attacked him. Guess you didn't hear that either. Please tell us more lies. It's hilarious.
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78762 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>You mean like when you told us this pedophile only followed the boy for no more than ten seconds?

Or that this pedophile was not stalking the boy even though he was thirty seconds away from the car but two blocks away standing right in front of the boy who was on the sidewalk in front of his house minutes later?
Hello dimwit. You still stuck on that stalking thing. There was no stalking. That's why he wasn't charged dimwit.
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78763 Nov 1, 2013
Janitor wrote:
<quoted text>Zimmerman attacked Martin and got his butt kicked. If he had been tough enough to beat up a kid the way he beat up his old lady maybe he wouldn't have had to use his favorite phallic symbol to even the playing field when he lost the confrontation, which he started by following Martin in the first place, armed and ready to kill from the start, obviously.
Where is any evidence that Zimmerman attacked Martin? The prosecutor would like to know.
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78764 Nov 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>The pedophile wasn't arrested for carrying a gun- put aside, in many states, he would not have been legally allowed to carry a gun.

He was arrested for killing an unarmed boy who's only crime was being black while walking through a bigot's neighborhood.

A juror who judged him said it best: that your pedophile got away with murder.
The juror your referring to said it best when she said the trial was a publicity stunt and should have never went to trial and NOT GUILTY. Those with half a brain that saw the unedited version of the interview understand how the interviewer put the words in her mouth. Once again you look foolish.
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78765 Nov 1, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>You would make a lousy lawyer. Anybody can get a restraining order including Zimmerman which he did against his fiancee. Since they awarded Zimmerman with a restraining order, does that mean she beat up on him?????? You don't need any kind of evidence to get a restraining order. All you have to do is request one.

Yes, one does choose to hear what they hear, that's why you think Zimmerman said Fn coon. He didn't say that, but your imagination tells you he said that so you can be comforted with the nonsense that this was racial in some way.

I on the other hand have the 911 recording. Care to listen to it? I can even give you time stamps of when Zimmerman ran, when he stopped, and when his breathing returned to normal. That's not hearing what you want to hear. And if you hear differently, then you have some major problems. But if you want to listen to it, just ask, I'll post the link.

Now how much you want to bet that I stuck up for Martin when the story first came out? I'll pay ten to one odds if you want to wager.

Now for some reality:

The three incidents took place in Orange County, Fla.

In 2005, Zimmerman, then 20, was arrested and charged with “resisting officer with violence” and “battery of law enforcement officer,” both which are third-degree felonies. The charge was reduced to “resisting officer without violence” and then waived when he entered an alcohol education program. Contemporaneous accounts indicate he shoved an officer who was questioning a friend for alleged underage drinking at an Orange County bar.

In August 2005, ZimmermanÂ’s ex-fiancee, Veronica Zuazo, filed a civil motion for a restraining order alleging domestic violence. Zimmerman counterfiled for a restraining order against Zuazo. The competing claims were resolved with both restraining orders being granted.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/03/27/10...
He is not interested in the true facts, or watching the trial.
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78766 Nov 1, 2013
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>I see you failed to quote my entire statement and reply to it. And the part you did copy, your reply has nothing to do with anything!!! That's how stupid you are.

Let's try it again..... Here's what I said for the second time...

You care to attempt to explain how doing any of those things (none of which are against the law by any stretch of the imagination) justifies Martin attacking Zimmerman?? That was the only law broken that night.

If not, shut the [email protected] up.

I suggest you either reply to the entire statement or shut the [email protected] son.
LOL. That barefoot is a moron. It's a waste of time discussing the true facts in the case with that moron. All it can come back with is gay fantasies.
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78768 Nov 1, 2013
Just like this thread the thug is dead. Not guilty. Time to move on.
PATRIOT DVC

Mexico, Mexico

#78769 Nov 1, 2013
Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop with your lies. Jesus frowns upon that.
He stood too close while Jesus was drinking wine. Just a good warm beer piss.

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#78771 Nov 1, 2013
Everything Zimmerman touches turns brown, He's got the shit touch.
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78772 Nov 1, 2013
zazz wrote:
Everything Zimmerman touches turns brown, He's got the shit touch.
Are you now blaming Zimmerman for Martin being shi** brown?
Truth

Tucker, GA

#78773 Nov 1, 2013
Next thing you know Zazz will be blaming Zimmerman for Obozocare being a complete failure. I know Obozo is looking for somebody else to blame.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Violent Crime Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Attorneys move to dismiss Traci Rhode case: Loc... (Apr '07) 22 hr jessica 61
News JonBenet: Paula Woodward on New Book, John Rams... Thu Rainbow334 7
News Attorney: Mississippi man shot in head by police Thu kosher nostra bibi 3
News Second arrest made in shooting (Jan '09) Thu Brother n law 93
News Shumpert legal fights continues to shift, narrow Wed Anonymous 30
News Trial for shooting pushed to December Wed Bryan davis 2
News Scesny convicted of murder and rape (Mar '12) Sep 20 Jomminy Crickets 83
More from around the web