Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks ...

Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

There are 66307 comments on the Wall Street Journal story from Mar 22, 2012, titled Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media. In it, Wall Street Journal reports that:

Social media has put the spotlight on the story Trayvon Martin , an unarmed African-American teenager who was shot to death last month by a neighborhood watch captain in Florida.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51834 Feb 12, 2013
Laughing from North of 49 wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess you'll just have to ask the prosecution EXACTLY what evidence they have. ROTFALMFAO!! Ya... and Trayvon only had a bullet.... looks like he put up a helluva fight to try and save his own life.... but like you gun obsessed amoronicans say... you can't bring a fist to a gun fight and expect to win.
As for you... how's that witness protection program thingy going??
Prosecution has no evidence that will prove that ash try did not break Zims nose and continue to beat him.......

Zim walks and you burn down your hood.......

No law against shooting a black punk that is attacking you
Watermelon crawl

Dalton, GA

#51837 Feb 12, 2013
I'm scared!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51838 Feb 12, 2013
Laughing from North of 49 wrote:
<quoted text>Guess you have to prove that the "black puck" actually attacked. And I bet dollars to doughnuts that the prosecution has evidence to the contrary.
All of the evidence does show that........LOL

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51839 Feb 12, 2013
Laughing from North of 49 wrote:
<quoted text>You just don't get it, do you??? You can't charge someone without evidence.... that only happens in the former Soviet Union. What a dumbazz...
Happens all of the time

I was charged with murder and walked

How about OJ??

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51844 Feb 12, 2013
Laughing from North of 49 wrote:
<quoted text>
Plea bargains don't count. How's the witness protection program working out for ya?? Ratting on your (drug dealer) employer is dangerous business.
No plea in the OJ case troll..........ROTFLMAO

How would I know troll????

Once again when proven wrong the troll reverts to schoolyard rants....

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51845 Feb 12, 2013
Laughing from North of 49 wrote:
<quoted text>
Really??? You're gonna tell me (with your obvious anti-black stance) that OJ was innocent??!!! Seriously??!! ROTFALMFAO!!! Why am I not surprised... racist fright wing turds like you will sleep with the devil if it suites their cause. Un-fcuking-believable!!!
Please show me where I ever used the word innocent???

Court of law does not look at innocent or guilty.......

They only look at if the prosecution can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime was committed....

And there is ZERO evidence that proves Zim broke any law........

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51848 Feb 12, 2013
Laughing from North of 49 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again.... your fcuking comprehension skills are non-existent. I was referring to YOUR plea bargain, dumbazz. Once again the clueless moron makes himself look stupider than normal. Hey... what do they call you in Mexico??? El Stupido??
I see you are even dumber than you sound..........ROTFLMAO

No plea bargin for me........

Looks like you are the moron..........LOL

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51849 Feb 12, 2013
Laughing from North of 49 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh... don't play me for a fool, jackazz... you certainly implied it.
And again, el Stupido.... the prosecution cannot lay charges without evidence. GI Jane was charged with 2nd degree murder. Ergo, there IS sufficient evidence to go to trial. For cryst sakes, dumbazz... you claim you beat 2 murder raps because the prosecution had no evidence. So let me get this straight.... when the judge ordered the prosecution to stand up and state it's case, the prosecuting attorney approached the bench and simply said, "Your honour.... the prosecution rests." ROTFLAMFAO!!!! el Stupido.... you're absolutely too funny!!!
Yes they can..........And yes they do..........Millions are charged every year and walk away.......

Are you really this stupid???

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51851 Feb 12, 2013
Laughing from North of 49 wrote:
<quoted text>
uh..... nope.... no they don't el Stupido!! Maybe in the former Soviet Union, but certainly not in the Untied States of America. Are you seriously telling me the that the prosecution didn't present ANY evidence at your trial??? Nothing???... nada... ziltch....bumpkiss??? They simple looked at the judge and said, "We got nuthin', Your Honour." Were you sober at your trial! ROTFALMFO!!! Nice try... el Stupido
Millions are charged every year and found not guilty..........

That is what a jury is for......

If everyone that was arrested was guilty we would not need a court of law......

Zim broke no laws.......

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51853 Feb 12, 2013
Laughing from North of 49 wrote:
<quoted text>
That's absolutely correct.... however, el Stupido, THEY WEREN'T CHARGED WITHOUT EVIDENCE. If they got off, then it was the "EVIDENCE" that proved it wasn't them ... or the "EVIDENCE" was insufficient. But make no mistake, el Stupido, THERE WAS EVIDENCE. What a doorknob!
I see you really are that stupid..........ROTFLMAO

Only a shred of evidence that shows that MAYBE a crime was commited is all that is needed for an arrest........

A conviction is far far far far far far far far different

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51855 Feb 12, 2013
Laughing from North of 49 wrote:
<quoted text>
a shred of evidence!! ROTFALMFAO!!! Really... the prosecution is going spend a sh!t load of money to prosecute with only a "shred" of evidence!!! heh heh heh! El Stupido..... you've earned your name. Congratulations!
No evidence is even needed for an arrest.......Simply one person making a claim.........

But moron/liberals are too stupid to understand this..........ROTFLMAO
Laughing from North of 49

Grimsby, Canada

#51856 Feb 12, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
No evidence is even needed for an arrest.......Simply one person making a claim.........
But moron/liberals are too stupid to understand this..........ROTFLMAO
So... you're a refugee from the Soviet Union, eh El Stupido?? ROTFALMFAO!! too funny! Hell even on TV cop shows they say, "Gee sarge... we don't have enough evidence to hold him."

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51857 Feb 12, 2013
Laughing from North of 49 wrote:
<quoted text>
So... you're a refugee from the Soviet Union, eh El Stupido?? ROTFALMFAO!! too funny! Hell even on TV cop shows they say, "Gee sarge... we don't have enough evidence to hold him."
Yes when proven wrong the liberal/trolls revert to childish schoolyard rants..........LOL

You still cant provide one piece of evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Zim broke any law......
thinking

Port Saint Lucie, FL

#51858 Feb 12, 2013
the grass stains can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

the pictures of the beating

the witnesses
.
the 911 call made by george

george screaming for help

no injuries to martin

what exactly does the state have that is rock solid and can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

they cannot prove that zimmerman confronted martin.
thinking

Port Saint Lucie, FL

#51859 Feb 12, 2013
george was within his rights to defend himself.

george had the right to get out of his vehicle and look for a street address to give to the police .. so this way the cops would have a precise location of were the suspicious person was..

of course george didn't want a possible thief getting away.

the neighborhood was being threatened by criminals who ll fit trayvons description for months
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#51860 Feb 12, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you are even dumber than you sound..........ROTFLMAO
No plea bargin for me........
Looks like you are the moron..........LOL
lol! You sure do emphasize the party of no son.
thinking

Port Saint Lucie, FL

#51861 Feb 12, 2013
and yes it is true trayvon had every right to be where he was.

he would have saved his life he would have just decided to wear a suit and tie while walking to the store

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51862 Feb 12, 2013
thinking wrote:
the grass stains can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
the pictures of the beating
the witnesses
.
the 911 call made by george
george screaming for help
no injuries to martin
what exactly does the state have that is rock solid and can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
they cannot prove that zimmerman confronted martin.
Correct

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#51863 Feb 12, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! You sure do emphasize the party of no son.
LIke this???

.
.

On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...

The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……


Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution.........
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p ...
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#51864 Feb 12, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
No evidence is even needed for an arrest.......Simply one person making a claim.........
But moron/liberals are too stupid to understand this..........ROTFLMAO
Excuse me? No evidence is needed for an Arrest? No Probable Cause?
No U.S. Constitution? No illegal Search and Seizure? No Miranda?
You truly are a piece of work Swifty.
Not surprised your cronies and homeboys are out to kill you.
Good luck with that.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Violent Crime Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Scesny convicted of murder and rape (Mar '12) 15 hr Suomi 82
News Warrant: Man charged with murder agreed to meet... Sun Lilac St Cyr 1
News Recent SF Murder Seems Certain To Figure Into S... Sun Wildchild 4
News St. Louis braces for more protests after police... Sep 16 Team Kelly 1
News Third Bandido arrested in motorcycle bar shooting (Dec '14) Sep 16 Brian 99
News Attorney: Mississippi man shot in head by police Sep 16 treason watch 2
News Shumpert legal fights continues to shift, narrow Sep 16 Shift and narrow 29
More from around the web