Apparent......... Not facts or evidence<quoted text>.
" ...that would lead a reasonably intelligent and prudent person... "
Ah! there's the rub. You don't meet the qualifications.
"Apparent facts discovered through logical inquiry that would lead a reasonably intelligent and prudent person to believe that an accused person has committed a crime, thereby warranting his or her prosecution, or that a Cause of Action has accrued, justifying a civil lawsuit."
Are you really that stupid
If a arrest proved guilt there would be no need for a trial..........LOL
Millions are arrested and found not guilty
I face it there is no proof that Zim broke any law