Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks ...

Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

There are 66309 comments on the Wall Street Journal story from Mar 22, 2012, titled Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media. In it, Wall Street Journal reports that:

Social media has put the spotlight on the story Trayvon Martin , an unarmed African-American teenager who was shot to death last month by a neighborhood watch captain in Florida.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#49295 Jan 21, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Nah! Just caught you at your lies son!
On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p...

Yea wrote.
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#49296 Jan 21, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! And yet, you're the proven liar son!
On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p...

Yea wrote.
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#49297 Jan 21, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Based on your claims son, it is.
Your problem is you got caught in your own stupid logic.
Tbat and you're a proven liar son!
On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p...

Yea wrote.
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#49302 Jan 21, 2013
zazz wrote:
<quoted text>
He wasn't qualified to be a security guard.
The big fat perv followed, stalked, accosted and murdered an unarmed child who was trying to escape from him.
He was.........ROTFLMAO

perfectly legal to chase a 215 suspect with a loaded gun.......

Perfectly legal to shoot a punk that is on top of you beating you..........

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#49303 Jan 21, 2013
zazz wrote:
<quoted text>
According to the medical report, Zimmerman's head was not bached into the concrete.
"The report detailed two open wounds on the back of Zimmerman’s head, one two centimeters and one half a centimeter, which did not require stitches. She described his head as “normocephalic and atraumatic’’— normal and without injuries."
There was more than one wound on the back of Zims head and his doctor said more than three smacks.....

No law says your brains have to leak out before you shoot a black punk that is on top of you beating you.....

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#49304 Jan 21, 2013
jkjkhardcore wrote:
<quoted text>Then you would have heard the motive, they always get away, or maybe your just an idiot who doesn't understand premeditation.
Yes there had been many 215s in the neighborhood and they all got away.......

So?????

the black punk would have lived another day if he had answered the questions.........
cooch

Cologno Monzese, Italy

#49305 Jan 21, 2013
Be Truthful Be Free = Racist + LIAR = Toxic Narcissism = Hatred of others X 2 = Ho + Mo = Raw Hatred

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#49306 Jan 21, 2013
Slammo wrote:
Zazza sounds like an Angry racist that just wants to further the hate, the kind of hatred that a racist would have and if it is proven that Zimmerman is not guilty and he walks, you will still,be crying racism but,yet you praised OJ Simpsons not guilty verdict when everyone,on the planet knew that man anynomous his wife and her friend Ron Goldman. You can call me racist if it makes you feel better but I have stood up to much tougher than you , in defense of my mixed race nephew. I too am a mix of three races so nice try.......the difference is you can cry racism every chance you think you get and use it as an excuse to make yourself feel the victim or you can embrace all races and see,past the color of one's skin......and see folks for what they are on the inside.....your inside appears rotten to the core but you cram change that. Try to see everyone as another human being with potential to be your next best friend....your next love....your next favorite neighbor .... your next chance to turn someone' s bad day not a day of laughter and happiness.
Correct.........

After Zim walks these morons will burn down their houses and ransack their neighbors business......

That is how these fools act......
cooch

Cologno Monzese, Italy

#49307 Jan 21, 2013
barefoot2626 = full blown acute homosexual pedophilia = 52,000 coxucking posts = Unbelievable

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#49308 Jan 21, 2013
do unto others wrote:
How is it a show of 'racist hatred against Zimmerman' to give an opinion-I think he's guilty of murder, and explain the reasons for your opinion-Zimmerman is a liar, his multiple stories are inconsistant with each other, his multiple stories are inconsistant with the physical evidence, he profiled Martin as a f*cking punk, and an a**hole that always gets away before he came face to face with him...I could go on and on.
But nothing I write about why I think he's guilty of murder has anything to do with 'racist hatred'. Maybe hatred against a profiling cop wannabe that killed an unarmed kid, but that has nothing to do with Zimmerman's race.
The grass stains prove that Zim was on his back and the dead punk was not

The busted knuckles of the dead punk shows he hit something many times with both closed fist

The injuries to Zims face show he was hit at least three times in the face.

The injuries to the back of Zims head show his head hit the ground three times.

The dead punk was never struck in the face......His only injuries were to his knuckles and a single point blank gun shot wound.

The witness said he saw two MEN fighting on the ground. Grass stains prove it was Zim on the bottom.

Zim called authorities the dead pun k called his girl.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#49309 Jan 21, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Racism is their primary defense.
I'd tell them to use stupidity as a defense but they're too stupid to understand that option!
On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p...

Yea wrote.
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!
cooch

Cologno Monzese, Italy

#49310 Jan 21, 2013
barefoot2626 = Ho + Mo = oral pedophilia fixation = coxucking fantasy projection = 52,000 posts = WTF?

“as you would have others...”

Since: Mar 09

United States

#49311 Jan 21, 2013
Not sure how I can be anti-caucasian when I'm WHITE. I am anti-racists, no matter the color.
cooch

Cologno Monzese, Italy

#49312 Jan 21, 2013
do unto others + Yeah + zazz + Crisco + ToManyLaws + barefoot2626 + MrCitizen01 = 7 headed beast
cooch

Cologno Monzese, Italy

#49313 Jan 21, 2013
do unto others = Racebaiter = Race traitor = racist obsession = anti-American progressive
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#49314 Jan 21, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p...
Yea wrote.
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.
That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!
lol! And here is what I was responding to.... not that you'll read it my little kumquat!

"Still waiting..........LOL
tell us why you cant show us any facts that proves the dead black punk did not attack Zim???
As if the jury is shown the facts that prove the punk attacked Zim then Zim walks free..........LOL "

Funny... I'd like to see that proof you claim you have son.... not that it's other than your word!

“as you would have others...”

Since: Mar 09

United States

#49315 Jan 21, 2013
The grass stains prove Martin was holding Zimmerman down, trying to keep him from reaching his gun.
The one scratch below his left ring-finger knuckle shows no such thing.
As per Zimmerman's PA, his nose was 'likely' broken, and the two black eyes are expected with that type of injury (likely broken nose).
The 2 scratches on the back of Zimmerman's head shows he scraped his head on the rough surface of the sidewalk whime he was wriggling around.
Again the scratch was on the skin below his left ring-finger knuckle, not knuckles. And one wouldn't really expect to see marks on Martin from where Zimmerman grabbed his hoodie sleeve in an attempt to detain him until police arrived.
If a witness saw two men fighting on the ground, that would mean Zimmerman was a participant in the fight and not a helpless victim. Which witness was this?
Zimmerman called to report a suspicious person before he followed Martin to establish an aliby. Martin's girlfriend was already on the phone with him.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#49316 Jan 21, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! And here is what I was responding to.... not that you'll read it my little kumquat!
"Still waiting..........LOL
tell us why you cant show us any facts that proves the dead black punk did not attack Zim???
As if the jury is shown the facts that prove the punk attacked Zim then Zim walks free..........LOL "
Funny... I'd like to see that proof you claim you have son.... not that it's other than your word!
Wrong again liar..........

Just click on the link I provided and everyone can see you are now caught telling a lie to cover your lie..........LOL

The link proves YOU are a liar........

So tell us why you cant do this to where you claimed I lied????

Waiting my little troll..........Waiting........ ..LOL.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Lets all watch the moron Yea claim that the burden of proof is on the defense..........LOL

How stupid must a person be to think this???

Ok.......

You might want to use the restroom before you read this as some have wet their pants from laughing so hard........

.
.
.
.
.

On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p...

Yea wrote.
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#49317 Jan 21, 2013
do unto others wrote:
The grass stains prove Martin was holding Zimmerman down, trying to keep him from reaching his gun.
The one scratch below his left ring-finger knuckle shows no such thing.
As per Zimmerman's PA, his nose was 'likely' broken, and the two black eyes are expected with that type of injury (likely broken nose).
The 2 scratches on the back of Zimmerman's head shows he scraped his head on the rough surface of the sidewalk whime he was wriggling around.
Again the scratch was on the skin below his left ring-finger knuckle, not knuckles. And one wouldn't really expect to see marks on Martin from where Zimmerman grabbed his hoodie sleeve in an attempt to detain him until police arrived.
If a witness saw two men fighting on the ground, that would mean Zimmerman was a participant in the fight and not a helpless victim. Which witness was this?
Zimmerman called to report a suspicious person before he followed Martin to establish an aliby. Martin's girlfriend was already on the phone with him.
Do you really think the jury is going to believe this poor little defenseless boy was able to hold down the big security guard meanie??

This is what the jury will hear.

The knuckles showed multiple spots that the medical examiner said were from punching something..........

The wounds to the back of Zims head were not abrasions but blunt force impacts.

The witness saw two men struggling on the ground but only Zim has grass stains on his back......
So Zim was on the ground with the dead punk on top of him..........

Also the dead punk told his girl that he was right outside the house but was going back to do something..........

Zim walks and you burn down your hood..........ROTFLMAO

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#49318 Jan 21, 2013
Do unto others and coach are two folks you cannot argue with and get an ounce of sense out of their minuscule little race baiting brains......there is much information out there and none of you have enough information to be screaming guilty or innocent out there just yet.....although it does appear the man was defending himself against a much larger kid who was in fact , according to the police statement, able to provide Zimmerman with some nasty cuts on the back of his head, possibly from trayvon bashing zimmermans head into the concrete.....if that is proven in court then by all means Zimmerman will be a free man because that is not a crime to shoot an attacker that is bashing your head into the concrete. ......I would shoot such an attacker too...........I gotta believe o'meara would not take the case of Zimmerman unless he felt the man was defendable and the case was favoring zimmermans version of events. He is a top notch attorney and wouldn't smear his name for a guy that he could not keep out of prison.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Violent Crime Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News APNewsBreak: Official: Chicago to hire 100s mor... 3 hr Joe Balls 76
News Keith Scott's wife has filed multiple restraini... 3 hr Animal blacks 9
News Suspect charged in shooting of four people in e... 13 hr gun power 1
News Woman groped in Georgetown, suspect is arrested Tue Amn 1
News October trial set for Perez in 2015 slaying Tue Nosy 1
News Jury selection continues in Kiplinger murder trial (Aug '07) Tue NeverForget 38
News The Latest: Investigators still at Houston shoo... Tue Dothead Chimps Out 1
More from around the web