Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks ...

Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

There are 66309 comments on the Wall Street Journal story from Mar 22, 2012, titled Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media. In it, Wall Street Journal reports that:

Social media has put the spotlight on the story Trayvon Martin , an unarmed African-American teenager who was shot to death last month by a neighborhood watch captain in Florida.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#46713 Jan 2, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Really..........LOL
Why would a care what someone like you thinks????
Bottom line is that you nor anyone else can prove Zim broke any law
The state prosecutor can and will.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#46714 Jan 2, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! This coming from the idiot who doesn't understand where the term "common defense" in the US Constitution is derived and used.
It is located in the Preamble, its meaning is self- evident, except to those who chose to argue about it..."Provide= 1. Supply; Furnish. 2. To take care for the future. for the Common Defence. Next Act...
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#46715 Jan 2, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell us why you cant prove even one lie?????
Besides the fact you are a liar..........LOL
lol! I already have son.

Doesn't it bother you to know that your opinion was actually disproved in the real world son?

If it doesn't, it should!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#46716 Jan 2, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
I see once again you dont understand how a court system works..........
The defense will provide Zims account and the evidence that ALL backs it up in the opening statement..........LOL
The prosecution will then be required to prove that Zim broke a law..........ROTFLMAO
And that involves proving the facts the defense provides wrong..........
Like..........
Grass stains
injuries to the perps knuckles
Injuries to Zims face and head
Witnesses
911 tapes
The perps girl friends phone call
lol! Oh, that's right. Your claim that the prosecution must disprove the defense opening statement!

That was a good one. But then, you were serious!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#46717 Jan 2, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
The only thing you have proven troll is that you are a troll.
lol! It seems clear you feel you have the power to approve or disapprove of real world facts son.

Personally... between you and me... you don't! Thought you'd like to know that.

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#46718 Jan 2, 2013
"Zimmerman’s case could turn on another idiosyncrasy in Florida law—a nuanced provision related to who provokes a deadly confrontation. The law states that a defendant can’t “stand his ground” and use deadly force if he “initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself.” Prosecutors will almost surely argue that Zimmerman provoked the confrontation with Martin, and for that reason is unprotected by the law."
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#46719 Jan 2, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you are too stupid to read the word prosecutor in my post.......
So you admit that you know of no facts that prove Zim committed a crime and that the dead perp did not attack him..........ROTFLMAO
That is what the original DA said also......
lol! As I keep telling you my little ignorant fool, that's what the trial is for.

You really don't grasp how the system works at all, do you?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#46720 Jan 2, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>It is located in the Preamble, its meaning is self- evident, except to those who chose to argue about it..."Provide= 1. Supply; Furnish. 2. To take care for the future. for the Common Defence. Next Act...
lol! Wow. In the Preamble.

Good thing you're limited. Otherwise you'd really be clueless!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#46721 Jan 2, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you are too stupid to read the word prosecutor in my post.......
So you admit that you know of no facts that prove Zim committed a crime and that the dead perp did not attack him..........ROTFLMAO
That is what the original DA said also......
lol! And yet, you still lied son!

And that still makes you a... liar!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#46722 Jan 2, 2013
zazz wrote:
<quoted text>
The state prosecutor can and will.
What evidence to they have that proves the perp did not attack Zim???

The evidence that I have posted collaborates Zims story..........LOL

The prosecution must prove that Zim was not attacked........Or Zim walks......

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#46723 Jan 2, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! I already have son.
Doesn't it bother you to know that your opinion was actually disproved in the real world son?
If it doesn't, it should!
Yes we all know you are full of BS..........

If you had proven anything you would be happy to repost it..........ROTFLMAO

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#46724 Jan 2, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Wow. In the Preamble.
Good thing you're limited. Otherwise you'd really be clueless!
It's you who chooses to be ignorant, which is self-evident. Why don't you give it up, you know so little of the U.S. Constitution, you're swinging at the Pacific breeze....

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#46725 Jan 2, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Oh, that's right. Your claim that the prosecution must disprove the defense opening statement!
That was a good one. But then, you were serious!
I see you get dumber by the minute..........LOL

The prosecution must prove that Zimm was not attacked..........

But someone like you will never understand that.......

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#46726 Jan 2, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! It seems clear you feel you have the power to approve or disapprove of real world facts son.
Personally... between you and me... you don't! Thought you'd like to know that.
Yes the troll cant back up anything she says..........LOL

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#46727 Jan 2, 2013
zazz wrote:
"Zimmerman’s case could turn on another idiosyncrasy in Florida law—a nuanced provision related to who provokes a deadly confrontation. The law states that a defendant can’t “stand his ground” and use deadly force if he “initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself.” Prosecutors will almost surely argue that Zimmerman provoked the confrontation with Martin, and for that reason is unprotected by the law."
Facts.

There is now law that states Zim could not follow a suspected 215 perp.....With his loaded gun.......

The only way Zim can be convicted is if the prosecution can prove that Zim was not attacked.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#46728 Jan 2, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! As I keep telling you my little ignorant fool, that's what the trial is for.
You really don't grasp how the system works at all, do you?
Thanks for proving that you know of no fact that can show Zim was not attacked..........LOL

Under Florida law Zim can legally shoot the perp if he was attacked.......

I have posted the law here many times....

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#46729 Jan 2, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Wow. In the Preamble.
Good thing you're limited. Otherwise you'd really be clueless!
Yes only a moron would say that everyone does not know what they are talking about......

And the same moron would claim that a fact I posted that states it is a gated community was not a fact but my opinion only..........ROTFLMAO

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#46730 Jan 2, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! And yet, you still lied son!
And that still makes you a... liar!
Post a link..........Waiting......... .ROTFLMAO
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#46731 Jan 2, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
What evidence to they have that proves the perp did not attack Zim???
The evidence that I have posted collaborates Zims story..........LOL
The prosecution must prove that Zim was not attacked........Or Zim walks......
lol! So far son, the only person who qualifies as a "perp" is Zimmerman.

But you're not intelligent enough to see that!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#46732 Jan 2, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes we all know you are full of BS..........
If you had proven anything you would be happy to repost it..........ROTFLMAO
lol! Oh wait! You mean like when you "claimed" to have posted your (snicker) "sources" many times?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Violent Crime Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Video figures into appeal of convicted murderer... (Aug '08) 8 hr BillH 144
News Jury awards $15.5 million to Kevin Fox and his ... (Dec '07) 11 hr Unknown 66
News Man charged with the murder of his girlfriend (Feb '12) 19 hr Tracy Adams 17
News Appeals court reverses Cindy George's murder co... (Mar '07) Fri frank januzelli 467
News Epithet caused fight that led to Chaparral grad... Fri spytheweb 1
News Lawyer in 'Baby Doe' case pushing to move trial... Thu Cops are degenerates 4
News Deputies: Man shot while standing outside Delto... Thu Fitus T Bluster 1
More from around the web