Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
But they do have a right to stop a forcible felony being committed

Killing a boy walking on a sidewalk while being black and armed with a bag of candy is no longer legal, even in Florida.

The key to the stand your ground defense is: standing.

Not running for three blocks and then pulling out a weapon and shooting someone for sassing.

[Yeah]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
But they do have a right to stop a forcible felony being committed against them which threatens to cause grievous bodily harm or possible death.

It's not one if they initiated the confrontation in the first place, son.

You can't switch sides of the law because you went from being the winner to the loser.

[Yeah]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Rather stupid to carry an unloaded one, just so we are clear.

Then using your argument, it's clear he knew he was taking a loaded weapon with an intent to use it, son.

Otherwise if you disagree, see your statement above!

[Yeah]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Facts are easily discernible.

Not when people like you try to disguise, interpret and inject your opinions on them son.

[downhill246]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
I cannot help you DON'T KNOW HOW TO READ!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!

I certainly can't help if reading comprehension is not your forte.

[downhill246]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>Not when people like you try to disguise, interpret and inject your opinions on them son.

"While George Zimmerman could lawfully follow Trayvon Martin -- even if the police dispatcher told him not to – he had no legal right to stop him, question him, or put his hands on him...."
Jon H Gutmacher ,Florida criminal defense lawyer

Let me repeat, there is no law against following someone and there is no law against carrying a concealed weapon with a permit. Which "fact" do you believe is incorrect, gramps?

[downhill246]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>Then using your argument, it's clear he knew he was taking a loaded weapon with an intent to use it, son.
Otherwise if you disagree, see your statement above!

Why carry a loaded gun if you don't intend on using it if circumstances warrant it? Liberal logic and reality are often polar opposites and your post is a prime example of that fact.

[Yeah]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
"While George Zimmerman could lawfully follow Trayvon Martin -- even if the police dispatcher told him not to – he had no legal right to stop him, question him, or put his hands on him...."
Jon H Gutmacher ,Florida criminal defense lawyer
Let me repeat, there is no law against following someone and there is no law against carrying a concealed weapon with a permit. Which "fact" do you believe is incorrect, gramps?

And this should borne out in court.

[Yeah]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Why carry a loaded gun if you don't intend on using it if circumstances warrant it? Liberal logic and reality are often polar opposites and your post is a prime example of that fact.

lol! Oops! And not a change in wording "...if circumstances warrant it..."

You people keep moving the goal posts to make your point.

[downhill246]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>And this should borne out in court.

Seems logical that the law will be explained in court.

[downhill246]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
I cannot help you DON'T KNOW HOW TO READ!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!

You are easy.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
I certainly can't help if reading comprehension is not your forte.

I'm not the one that thinks running three blocks and shooting a boy armed with a bag of candy in the chest is 'standing your ground'.

[Cat74]

You have every right to shoot a drugged up teen trying to attack you, and steal your gun. There was plenty of drugs found in the Autopsy of little Trayvon. He wasn't himself, I guess. Now he is nobody.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
You are easy.

Hey George, the ocean called; they're running out of shrimp...

[downhill246]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text> It's not one if they initiated the confrontation in the first place, son.
You can't switch sides of the law because you went from being the winner to the loser.

Incorrect. If one is the initial aggressor but then retreats from confrontation(that never took place? like going back to his truck he can still claim SYG .He still has a right to defend himself from a forcible felony independent of the SYG law. Pays to own the Florida Firearms laws and Use book,7th edition, like I do, instead of guessing about the law, like you do.

[heldebeast]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Oops! And not a change in wording "...if circumstances warrant it..."
You people keep moving the goal posts to make your point.

lol....punks like you always get the sh!t kicked out of em around here....lol....most people would just slap you like they'd slap their own out of control spoiled teenage children....lol....Most people don't live in the silly world, your world, they'd much prefer to just slap the sh!t out of your silly selves....lol.

I always get a kick out of it when the slapee always starts screaming bloody murder...lol.

[downhill246]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey George, the ocean called; they're running out of shrimp...

Are you saying the West Coast Flamer Shrimp is now an endangered species? Probably because same sex shrimp have a problem reproducing.

You are easy.

[Yeah]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Incorrect. If one is the initial aggressor but then retreats from confrontation(that never took place? like going back to his truck he can still claim SYG .He still has a right to defend himself from a forcible felony independent of the SYG law. Pays to own the Florida Firearms laws and Use book,7th edition, like I do, instead of guessing about the law, like you do.

lol! Oh? So you're giving up on syg now?

Change of facts requires a change of plans on your part son?

Interesting.

[rectomas ooze]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey George, the ocean called; they're running out of shrimp...

Hello Barefoot!! How's it goin girlfriend.. How you doin baby? It's me Georgie.

[xxxrayted]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
He's half Hispanic and Hispanics are whites.
Here's the math:½ white plus ½ white equals...
Still waiting for that explanation on why a sweat sweater would be suspicious clothing on a chilly evening.

Because in areas where blacks exist, hoodies are frequently used in crime. They cover your face so witnesses and cameras have a harder time identifying you. For those not committing a crime at the time, they wear them to look cool.

As I posted earlier, Zimmerman listed himself as Hispanic when he registered to vote. No different than the Mulatto and Chief being considered black.