Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

Mar 22, 2012 Full story: Wall Street Journal 66,201

Social media has put the spotlight on the story Trayvon Martin , an unarmed African-American teenager who was shot to death last month by a neighborhood watch captain in Florida.

Full Story
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#44970 Dec 25, 2012
zazz wrote:
<quoted text>
We all know how reliable Wiki is.
Your ignorance is laughable.
The state's attorney decides whether a child will be tried as an adult. Corey, who is prosecuting Zimmerthugman is also prosecuting as an adult, a boy who was 12 when his crime was committed.
So much for your theory.
Corey has the best conviction rate in the state of Florida. I'm glad our Republican governor appointed the Republican Corey to prosecute Zimmerthugman for the crime of murdering Trayvon, an unarmed child.
Me too, because I believe the charges were created to have the case thrown out of court or to have Zim found not guilty.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#44971 Dec 25, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know what court that would be.
Any court that respects Innocent until proven Guilty.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#44972 Dec 25, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
There are laws against murder.
There are also laws that protect victims when they use their firearm during an attack.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#44973 Dec 25, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
Once more...
You cannot shoot unarmed innocent people.
What's so hard to understand about that?
How can you feel threatened of death or bodily harm from an unarmed innocent person? Do you know the definition of "innocent"?
You need help.
:A person attacking another is not an innocent person. When you physically assault somebody, that's a crime which at that point makes that person committing a crime a criminal. You are allowed to defend yourself from attacks by criminals using a firearm.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44974 Dec 25, 2012
zazz wrote:
<quoted text>At least she is good for a Christmas day laugh.
That's true.

I laughed for about a minute on that one. I still cannot believe she posted that.

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#44975 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
I have posted the links many times and twice here today
Try and read..........
The doctors report show a broken nose and two cuts on the back if his head with at least to more marks
All if theses marks were made by the head slamming into a straight hard edge
The black perp had cuts on his knuckles that were fresh and consistent with hitting someone in the face
Zim had no such wounds
It was in hundreds of news papers around the world
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/03/2880246...
The morning after he killed Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman went to a clinic with what appeared to be a broken nose, two black eyes and two cuts on the back of his head. But the physicianís assistant who treated him determined he neither needed X-rays nor had he suffered head trauma, newly released medical records show.

The medical records document several injuries, but also state that the only reason Zimmerman sought medical attention was because he needed a doctorís note to return to work, Duval County Assistant State Attorney Bernie de la Rionda said in court last week.

Prosecutors say Zimmermanís injuries are not severe enough for the thrashing he claims to have endured. Zimmerman is charged with second-degree murder and, if convicted, faces a possible life sentence.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/03/2880246...

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#44976 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
In a court if law what Zim says is fact unless the prosecution can prove it wrong
Innocent until proven guilty unlike here
Not true. In fact, nothing much that you say is true.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44977 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>Any court that respects Innocent until proven Guilty.
Let's see then...

There was once a court that didn't believe words out of Thug Zimmerman's mouth to be facts.

Do you remember?

That's when the judge sent his azz back to the slammer and he had to come up with a million for bail.

So, it definitely wasn't that court that took Thug Zimmerman's words as fact.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44978 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>:A person attacking another is not an innocent person. When you physically assault somebody, that's a crime which at that point makes that person committing a crime a criminal. You are allowed to defend yourself from attacks by criminals using a firearm.
Once more...

You cannot shoot unarmed innocent people.

There are no laws that provide protections for that. NONE

NO ifs, ands or buts.

NO EXCEPTIONS
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#44979 Dec 25, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
It is you who has the crystal ball.
So, the Obama "minions" had gun-toting, drug-induced, woman-beating, Liar Thug Zimmerman sitting in his truck with a loaded gun on the night of February 26th?
They then had him profile and stalk a child who was minding his own business?
They then had him murder the child?
They then had an inept and incompetent police department do a corrupt investigation?
They then had an immoral State Attorney refuse to press charges?
They then had Thug Zimmerman to mislead the court and remain silent while his wife lie to the court?
They then had Thug Zimmerman pay off all his outstanding bills with blood money he begged for to use to defend himself?
Who are these puppet-master minions? We sure could have used them during Shrub II's presidency!
Please, do you think it's some sort of secret that the liberal media is in bed with the Democrats? Why was there so much misleading information when they decided to take this on a national level?

Democrats may be thieves, but they are not stupid. They knew well ahead of time that if they promote this as a racial gun crime, it would divide the country between gun rights people and anti-gun rights people like you. Gun rights people are usually conservative while gun hating people are usually liberal Democrats.

NBC and ABC cohorts of the Democrat party went as far as to lie about the evidence in order to try and make conservative people look bad. They tried to rile the troops to convince them it was a political divide of racist Republicans vs race loving liberals. They got caught. They supposedly apologized. NBC went as far as to say they fired the person responsible for doctoring the 911 recording, but refused to give the name of that person they supposedly fired.

Democrats win elections by dividing America: straight vs gay, black vs white, pro-live vs pro-choice, rich vs poor, they've been doing it for decades.

Is Travon Martin a unique case? No, it isn't. Similar events happen all the time in this country. But what made this a political pawn is that Zimmerman was half-white and Martin was black. That's it. Why have we not heard all the other stories of armed CCW holders who were accused of stepping out of line? Because it wouldn't divide this nation, that's why.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#44980 Dec 25, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's see then...
There was once a court that didn't believe words out of Thug Zimmerman's mouth to be facts.
Do you remember?
That's when the judge sent his azz back to the slammer and he had to come up with a million for bail.
So, it definitely wasn't that court that took Thug Zimmerman's words as fact.
No, but the court did the right thing. He was telling the truth until proven otherwise. That's the way a court operates. That's the way it will operate during the trial. Innocent until proven guilty. If they can't prove guilt, then Zimmerman walks free.

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#44982 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
In a court if law what Zim says is fact unless the prosecution can prove it wrong
Innocent until proven guilty unlike here
You have no knowledge of legal issues.

Nothing Zimmerthugman says will be taken as fact. His track record notwithstanding, a jury will decide if what he says is true or false. The state claims it is false. I think they can prove it.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44983 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>Please, do you think it's some sort of secret that the liberal media is in bed with the Democrats? Why was there so much misleading information when they decided to take this on a national level?

Democrats may be thieves, but they are not stupid. They knew well ahead of time that if they promote this as a racial gun crime, it would divide the country between gun rights people and anti-gun rights people like you. Gun rights people are usually conservative while gun hating people are usually liberal Democrats.

NBC and ABC cohorts of the Democrat party went as far as to lie about the evidence in order to try and make conservative people look bad. They tried to rile the troops to convince them it was a political divide of racist Republicans vs race loving liberals. They got caught. They supposedly apologized. NBC went as far as to say they fired the person responsible for doctoring the 911 recording, but refused to give the name of that person they supposedly fired.

Democrats win elections by dividing America: straight vs gay, black vs white, pro-live vs pro-choice, rich vs poor, they've been doing it for decades.

Is Travon Martin a unique case? No, it isn't. Similar events happen all the time in this country. But what made this a political pawn is that Zimmerman was half-white and Martin was black. That's it. Why have we not heard all the other stories of armed CCW holders who were accused of stepping out of line? Because it wouldn't divide this nation, that's why.
I don't know if you heard but the presidential campaign did not talk about gun rights.

The Repugnants were too busy talking about what to do with women's bodies and suppressing the right to vote.

Conservatives don't need anyone to make them look bad. They have the market cornered on that.

How many cases do you know where a gun-toting, woman-beating, drug-induced Thug kills an unarmed child who was minding his own business and the police refuse to arrest him and when the family went to police for answers the police stonewalled and lied to them?

You say..."similar events happen all the time in this country."

Ok, how many cases you know of? 50? 40? 30? 20?

15? 10? 5?

4? 3? 2?

Even 1 other case like this one?

Let us know.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44984 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>No, but the court did the right thing. He was telling the truth until proven otherwise. That's the way a court operates. That's the way it will operate during the trial. Innocent until proven guilty. If they can't prove guilt, then Zimmerman walks free.
You should have stopped at "no."

He wasn't telling the Truth. That's why bail was increased. That's why more conditions was placed on his release once he made the increased bail amount.

He misled the court and sat silently by as his wife flat out lied to the court.

You must have missed that. Go back and read the news reports.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#44985 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
You fools posted the link go read it..........ROTFLMAO
lol! You obviously read something that was there son.

Apparently you're afraid of the truth. I don't blame you since you don't have facts on your side!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#44986 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Jury instructions..........LOL
And they are the same as the first link
Only two states are not the same
The jury instructions state they can find the defendant not guilty or guilty of any or all of the listed charges.........PERIOD
Punks beware..........There are millions of us carrying a gun and will not allow you to assault us
lol! Ah! So it's still your word versus the Florida legal system.

No wonder you don't know much about the real world... you shut it out!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#44987 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
In a court if law what Zim says is fact unless the prosecution can prove it wrong
Innocent until proven guilty unlike here
Actually, no son. He's testifying under oath.

The jury can accept or discard any or all parts of the testimony. Nowhere is it written that what a defendant testifies to is a "fact."

You're even crazier than I thought! And more stupid too!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#44988 Dec 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
I have posted the links many times and twice here today
Try and read..........
The doctors report show a broken nose and two cuts on the back if his head with at least to more marks
All if theses marks were made by the head slamming into a straight hard edge
The black perp had cuts on his knuckles that were fresh and consistent with hitting someone in the face
Zim had no such wounds
It was in hundreds of news papers around the world
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/03/2880246...
lol! He slipped and fell son! There's nothing there to show that Martin did anything!

And read what else it says, doofus....

"...Zimmerman claims the Miami Gardens teenager attacked him and slammed his head on concrete. Prosecutors believe Zimmerman profiled the unarmed teenager, because he assumed Trayvon was a criminal.

The records show Zimmerman takes a variety of medications, including pills that both elevate your mood and calm it. He suffers from sacroiliitis, inflammation of the joints in the lower spine...."

Well gee son. It seems Zimmerman is a junkie now!

wow.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#44989 Dec 25, 2012
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>Just as the Hil-Bily slipped and fell on her face, and couldn't testify in front of Congress, Yeah... we know
lol! They had witnesses for that one didn't they, witless one?
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#44990 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Me too, because I believe the charges were created to have the case thrown out of court or to have Zim found not guilty.
lol! Then it's interesting how you're in favor of a rigged trial instead of a fair one!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Violent Crime Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The jury in Michael Dunn's "loud music" murder ... (Feb '14) 6 min RuffnReddy 3
FBI turns animal cruelty into top-tier felony e... 8 min Democrat Blunder 3
Teen's Shooting Highlights Racial Tension 33 min inbred Genius 3,018
Ky. has counties added to federal drug program 9 hr Delbert 5
Wasilla police release name of officer in shooting 9 hr Wasilla 1
Despite clarion call, youth violence continues ... 10 hr Fayatteille 1
Coroner identifies Allentown shooting victim 12 hr silly rabbit 8

Violent Crime People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE