When It Comes To Guns, How Young Is T...

When It Comes To Guns, How Young Is Too Young?

There are 190 comments on the National Public Radio story from May 2, 2013, titled When It Comes To Guns, How Young Is Too Young?. In it, National Public Radio reports that:

The shooting death of a 2-year-old girl in Kentucky at the hands of her 5-year-old brother has opened up yet another debate about gun control.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at National Public Radio.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#45 May 21, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Your post actually makes sense. And not only that, but has FACT in it as well. For the vast majority of the mass shootings that have taken place. Are done by those that are taking some form of psychotropic drugs:
Every mass shooting over last 20 years has one thing in common... and it's not guns
Tuesday, April 02, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com
Nearly every mass shooting incident in the last twenty years, and multiple other instances of suicide and isolated shootings all share one thing in common, and its not the weapons used.
The overwhelming evidence points to the signal largest common factor in all of these incidents is the fact that all of the perpetrators were either actively taking powerful psychotropic drugs or had been at some point in the immediate past before they committed their crimes.
Multiple credible scientific studies going back more then a decade, as well as internal documents from certain pharmaceutical companies that suppressed the information show that SSRI drugs ( Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors ) have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior....
http://www.naturalnews.com/039752_mass_shooti...
Umm ... Makes perfect sense, thank you. These facts should be all over the media as to part of big reasons why these young children are shooting just for the " thrill" of killing.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#46 May 22, 2013
hellodear wrote:
<quoted text>
Umm ... Makes perfect sense, thank you. These facts should be all over the media as to part of big reasons why these young children are shooting just for the " thrill" of killing.
You are most welcome. And I'm willing to do my part to spread the news.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47 May 22, 2013
hellodear wrote:
Back in the day, when a man regularly had to hunt food for his family, it was very appropriate for him to begin taking his sons with him at around age 5 to 8 years old.
Nope.

PS: Back in the day, it took a lot of skill to prepare and fire a weapon.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48 May 22, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
Every mass shooting over last 20 years has one thing in common
Two dozen mass shootings every year.

What they have in common: firearms and some idiot like you willing to sell him the gun.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#49 May 22, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
The overwhelming evidence points to the signal largest common factor in all of these incidents is the fact that all of the perpetrators were either actively taking powerful psychotropic drugs
Not even close.

Wipe your chin, GayDavy.

Do stop spamming the board.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#50 May 22, 2013
hellodear wrote:
<quoted text>
Umm ... Makes perfect sense, thank you. These facts should be all over the media as to part of big reasons why these young children are shooting just for the " thrill" of killing.
Sock puppet.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#51 May 22, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not even close.
Wipe your chin, GayDavy.
Do stop spamming the board.
You might enjoy living and propagating the LIE, but the average American does NOT.

Every mass shooting over last 20 years has one thing in common... and it's not guns

Tuesday, April 02, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

Nearly every mass shooting incident in the last twenty years, and multiple other instances of suicide and isolated shootings all share one thing in common, and its not the weapons used.

The overwhelming evidence points to the signal largest common factor in all of these incidents is the fact that all of the perpetrators were either actively taking powerful psychotropic drugs or had been at some point in the immediate past before they committed their crimes.

Multiple credible scientific studies going back more then a decade, as well as internal documents from certain pharmaceutical companies that suppressed the information show that SSRI drugs ( Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors ) have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior. One need only Google relevant key words or phrases to see for themselves. www.ssristories.com is one popular site that has documented over 4500 " Mainstream Media " reported cases from around the World of aberrant or violent behavior by those taking these powerful drugs.

The following list of mass shooting perpetrators and the drugs they were taking or had been taking shortly before their horrific actions was compiled and published to Facebook by John Noveske, founder and owner of Noveske Rifleworks just days before he was mysteriously killed in a single car accident. Is there a link between Noveske's death and his "outting" of information numerous disparate parties would prefer to suppress, for a variety of reasons?... http://www.naturalnews.com/039752_mass_shooti...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#52 May 22, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<
Every mass shooting over last 20 years has one thing in common... and it's not guns
Two dozen mass shootings every year.

What they have in common: firearms and some idiot like you willing to sell him the gun.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#53 May 22, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Two dozen mass shootings every year.
What they have in common: firearms and some idiot like you willing to sell him the gun.
"Baldwin, J. charged the jury.

"....he had a right to carry arms in defence of his property or person, and to use them, if either were assailed with such force, numbers or violence as made it necessary the protection or safety of either...."

- U.S. Supreme Court Justice BALDWIN, Circuit Court of The United States,[PENNSYLVANIA APRIL TERM 1833 BEFORE Hon. HENRY BALDWIN, Associate Justice of the [U.S.] Supreme Court, Hon JOSEPH HOPKINSON District Judge, Johnson v Tompkins,(13 F. Cas. 840 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1833)), and others.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#54 May 24, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Baldwin, J.
Dumbazz: The PA state constitution was at no time ever part of the US Constitution.

Why do you not ever READ the spam you post?

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA!

I know: you aren't smart enough to understand what you post.

And funny how you use Heller but you leave out this:
JusticeScalia wrote:
Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Courtís opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.
Justice Scalia
Writing for the majority of the real Supreme Court
Based on the real US Constitution
This century
[United States v.] Heller... 2008

[United States v.] Heller... 2008

[United States v.] Heller... 2008

[United States v.] Heller... 2008

[United States v.] Heller... 2008

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#55 May 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
8
- U.S. Supreme Court Justice BALDWIN, Circuit Court of The United States,[PENNSYLVANIA APRIL TERM 1833 BEFORE Hon. HENRY BALDWIN, Associate Justice of the [U.S.] Supreme Court, Hon JOSEPH HOPKINSON District Judge, Johnson v Tompkins,(13 F. Cas. 840 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1833)), and others.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#57 May 24, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Baldwin, J. charged the jury.
"....he had a right to carry arms ..."
He had the right to carry arms to recover his SLAVE...

Wipe your chin.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#58 May 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
He had the right to carry arms to recover his SLAVE...
Wipe your chin.
"More especially, it cannot be believed that the large slaveholding States regarded them as included in the word citizens, or would have consented to a Constitution which might compel them to receive them in that character from another State. For if they were so received, and entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens, it would exempt them from the operation of the special laws and from the police regulations which they considered to be necessary for their own safety. It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognized as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went."--Mr. Chief Justice TANEY, U.S. Supreme Court, Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#59 May 24, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
(1856).
"Your intestine is full of Sperm."

_Dirty Hungarian Phrasebook_(1971)

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#60 May 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Your intestine is full of Sperm."
_Dirty Hungarian Phrasebook_(1971)
United States Constitution: Second Article of Amendment; Restrictive Clause;

"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".

United States Constitution:

Article. IV.

Section. 1.

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

Section. 2.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Article. VI.: 2nd and 3rd clauses;

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#61 May 24, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
United States Constitution: Second Article of Amendment; Restrictive Clause;
GunShow1 wrote:
Why were there NO 'gun control laws' from 1791 all the way up to 1934?
Kentucky enacted the first carrying concealed weapon statute in the United States in 1813.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#62 May 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Kentucky enacted the first carrying concealed weapon statute in the United States in 1813.
"William Henry testified substantially as follows:

"I arrived at Bethlehem on the evening of the 6th of March, 1799. We had heard that there was a party of men would collect, for the purpose of rescuing the prisoners who were there in custody of the marshal; in consequence of that, I went to assist the marshal, and, if possible, prevail on the people to desist. I was one of the Judges of the Court of Common Pleas for the County of Northampton. About ten o' clock on the morning of the 7th, two men, with arms, arrived at the tavern where we were; who, when inquired of by the marshal as to their intention in coming armed, appeared to be diffident about answer; after first saying that they came upon a shooting frolic, one of them said they were come in order to see what was best to be done for the country. After that, came in several others, armed and on horseback, two of them in uniform, with swords and pistols...."

"...I also walked out for the same purpose, requesting them to withdraw, and not appear in arms in order to obstruct the process of the United States laws. They answered, that they were freemen, and might go where they pleased with their arms. I told them that they ran great risk by appearing in arms for such a purpose as I feared they were come. They came in a number, but I don t know how many particularly, as they mixed among the crowd. We requested them to deliver up their arms; but they refused. I also, at the same time, told one of them that it would be best for him to surrender himself, and not oppose the process; the others gave me answer, that they had come to accompany their friend, and to see that no injury was done to him. After this I returned into the lower back room of the house; by this time there were a number more collected round the house, but mostly armed. I don't recollect whether it was before these three men arrived, or not, that the marshal had sent off four men of his posse in order to meet the men with arms who were coming forward; and after we were up stairs three men arrived as a deputation from the armed body, making inquiry as to the intention of the marshal in taking these prisoners; with these three men, the four deputed by the marshal had returned from the armed body that was the other side of the bridge, in order to learn the marshal's object. The marshal assured them of the legality of the process, and reasoned with them as to the consequences of opposition, or threats to him, or preventing him from executing his duty; but I believe he liberated the two men that were first put in confinement, and returned them their guns. During the time that these two men were in confinement, we examined their guns, and found them loaded...."

- TRIAL OF THE NORTHAMPTON INSURGENTS, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA DISTRICT PHILADELPHIA, 1799-1800, James Iredell, one of the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#63 May 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Kentucky enacted the first carrying concealed weapon statute in the United States in 1813.
"Sect. 1. No free negro or mulatto shall keep or carry a fire-lock of any kind, or military weapon, or powder, or lead, without a licence from the court of the county or corporation; which licence may, at any time, be withdrawn. Arms, &c. so kept, shall be forfeited to the informer...."

"(A) A Certificate of the seizure of a gun, &c. on sect. 8, of 1 Rev, Code, p 187.

"county, to wit.

"Whereas AJ, of the county aforesaid, labourer, hath this day brought before me, JP, a justice of the peace for the said county, one gun, with powder and shot, by him found and seized in the bands and possession of a certain free mulatto man, known by the name of (or negro man slave belonging to as the case may be) who is not by law qualified to keep the same; and the said AJ having also, before me, made due proof of such seizure as aforesaid. By virtue of an act of the general assembly in that case made and provided, I do hereby order and direct, that the said AJ shall and may retain the said gun, powder and shot, to his own use; and that the said mulatto man shall receive thirty lashes upon his bare back, well laid on, which last sentence AC, a constable in this county, is ordered ta exetute. Given under my hand and seal, &c.
[Pg. 554]

SLAVES.

(B) Licence to keep arms and ammunition.

[This can only be granted by the court. See 2 Rev. Code, ch. 83, p 108.][Pg. 555]

-[The New Virginia Justice, Comprising the Office and Authority of a Justice of the Peace, in the Commonwealth of Virginia. TOGETHER WITH A VARIETY OF USEFUL PRECEDENTS, ADAPTED TO THE LAWS NOW IN FORCE. TO WHICH IS ADDED AN APPENDIX, CONTAINING ALL THE MOST APPROVED FORMS IN CONVEYANCING: SUCH AS DEEDS OF BARGAIN AND SALE, OF LEASE AND RELEASE; OF TRUST, MORTGAGES, BILLS OF SALE, &c. ALSO, THE DUTIES OF A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, ARISING UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES. By William Waller Hening, Attorney At Law. The Second Edition, Revised, Corrected, Greatly Enlarged, and Brought Down to the Present Time. By the Author. RICHMOND: PUBLISHED BY JOHNSON & WARNER. 1810.]

"Licensing" was intended for "SLAVES", and NOT free people.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#64 May 25, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"William Henry testified substantially as follows:
GunShow1 wrote:
Why were there NO 'gun control laws' from 1791 all the way up to 1934?
Kentucky enacted the first carrying concealed weapon statute in the United States in 1813.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#65 May 25, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Sect. 1. No free negro or mulatto shall keep or carry a fire-lock of any kind
So much for your no gun control.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Violent Crime Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Oak Hill man dies after shots exchanged in Faye... 1 hr Upeopleneedtogeta... 15
News Crime 43 mins ago 3:44 p.m.Closing arguments un... 4 hr Vandam 2
News Jeronimo Yanez, Minnesota officer in Philando C... 12 hr slick willie expl... 52
News Suspect in Soquel murder makes first court appe... (Aug '10) 13 hr 831caligurl 46
News Two men shot dead in Brentwood home invasion ro... 21 hr Jane Maxwell 2
News The Latest: Black groups in Cincinnati upset by... Mon POPS 1
News Onondaga DA among many named in civil rights su... Mon Danny Carranza 76
More from around the web