Would background checks stop mass sho...

Would background checks stop mass shootings?

There are 186 comments on the Local TV Station KTVZ story from Apr 11, 2013, titled Would background checks stop mass shootings?. In it, Local TV Station KTVZ reports that:

The tragic shootings in each of these and other towns have ignited public sentiment for some kind of gun reforms and fired up gun advocates to protect what they see as their constitutional right of easy access to firearms.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Local TV Station KTVZ.

moronfinder

Charlottesville, VA

#137 Apr 30, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Her's one for you to choke on:
Circuit court of the United States fifth circuit and district of Louisiana.
The United States
vs.
William J Cruikshank et al.
Charge of Hon WB Woods, circuit judge, delivered to the petit jury in the Grant Parish massacre case, referred to in the testimony of Mr Beckwith.
THE GRANT PARISH PRISONERS TRIAL--IN THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT--JUDGE
WOODS'S CHARGE--WAITING FOR THE VERDICT
...JR Beckwith, United States attorney, for the prosecution.
RH Marr w.R. Whittaker, E.J. Ellis, M. Ryan and-- Bryan, for the defense.
The United States vs William J. Cruikshank and others--Judge Woods,[later associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (188087)], charged the jury as follows:
"...The second count charges a banding together of the indicted parties with the intent to injure, oppress, threaten, and intimidate Nelson and Tillman, with the purpose to hinder and prevent them in the free exercise and enjoyment of their constitutional right to bear arms for a lawful purpose..."
"The right to bear arms is also a right protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States. Every citizen of the United States has the right to bear arms, provided it is done for a lawful purpose and in a lawful manner. A man who carries his arms openly, and for his own protection, or for any other lawful purpose, has as clear a right to do so as to carry his own watch or wear his own hat."
http://gunshowonthenet.blogspot.com/2013/04/t...
Getting better. Now you're only behind by about 130+/- years.
moronfinder

Charlottesville, VA

#138 Apr 30, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"The prospect of tyranny may not grab the headlines the way vivid stories of gun crime routinely do. But few saw the Third Reich coming until it was too late. The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed -- where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once."--Judge Alex Kozinski,[Silviera v. Lockyer, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 2003.]
Not a Supreme Court interpretation, so it's nothing more than a single judge's opinion; albeit a paranoid and delusional one.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#139 May 1, 2013
"It declared that when the constitutional rights of Vermont were invaded it was the duty of Massachusetts and all other States to rally to the support of Vermont in sustaining her constitutional rights.

"That State was then wrong. She was not only wrong but she was felo de se, as will yet be proved in the future. In this terrible war of ours, when the standard of rebellion was raised, when States like Maryland and Delaware and Kentucky stood upon their constitutional rights, it was our duty and our right to defend them, even by force of arms against the aggressions of the President and the Congress of the United States. It was the right and it was the duty of every State of every friend of reserved State rights, of every friend of constitutional liberty, of every friend of popular government to rally to the support of Delaware and Maryland and Kentucky and every other State whose rights were invaded and trampled upon by the usurping United States Government. Sir when Seymour
was Governor of New York he was at the of an imperium in imperio. He might have called in the aid of hundreds of thousands of armed freemen to stand up for the maintenance of the rights of the people of his State in their government and in their persons against the aggressions of the United States. It his duty and it ought to have
been tbe last act of his life, if he perished in the act, to stood in their defense."--Senator Lot M. Morrill, Feb. 1st, 1872,[The Congressional Globe, Volume 66, Part 1 By United States. Congress,(Page 766).]

"I should like to an amendment to this bill to the effect that quantity of arms say $1,000,000 worth or so should be given to these Indians...."

"...Now, I speak with the utmost in this matter. I know the value of an Indian's life. I know how sacred it has been with us, and how careful we have been to supply them with all arms of the best quality. I kuow that we have sought to give them Remington rifles and improved breech-loaders, and all the best guns we have invented, in order that
we might the satisfaction of having a good square with them."--Rep. Robert Roosevelt, Jan. 30, 1872,[The Congressional Globe, Volume 66, Part 1 By United States. Congress,(Pg. 716-7)]

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#141 May 1, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
"It declared(Pg. 716-7)]
230 year old spam.

Flagged.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#142 May 1, 2013
moronfinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Not a Supreme Court interpretation,
He pulls random quotes from another site and pastes them here.

And there and everywhere, GayDavy is the Guns&Ammo Dumbo.

You don't have to think they have anything to do with whatever the topic is or is addressing the point.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#143 May 1, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"The prospect
GayDavy spam.

flagged
We are

Santa Fe, NM

#144 May 1, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"The prospect of tyranny may not grab the headlines the way vivid stories of gun crime routinely do. But few saw the Third Reich coming until it was too late.
.]
quite aware of the right wing fascist elements, like yourself
Right

Santa Fe, NM

#145 May 1, 2013
[QUOTE who="GunShow1)][/QUOTE]

join those well-regulated militias and defend against real threats - not the phantoms in your head.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#147 May 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
230 year old spam.
Flagged.
"This is a most invaluable liberty guarantied to every American citizen. A people in the full enjoyment of the right of trial by jury, and all armed, are free, and cannot be reduced to slavery. In our country happily, the people are generally divided into opposing political parties of something like proximate numbers. All whether belonging to the party in power or the opposition, alike have the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. The free exercise of this right is indispensable to the safety of those in opposition, and it is equally necessary to the preservation of the liberties of all. It is impossible that half, or any great proportion of the people of a country, should be enslaved without that soon becoming the fate of the whole. That party which preserves its own liberties, necessarily achieves the same for the entire nation..."

"...A Just, patriotic, and constitutional administration of the Government would never attempt to subvert the right the opposition, of all the people, to keep and bear arms. It is a right formidable only to tyrants, usurpers, and oppressors."

- Senator Garrett Davis, Feb. 27, 1865,[THE CONGRESSIONAL GLOBE CONTAINING THE DEBATES AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND SESSION OF THE THIRTY EIGHTH CONGRESS ALSO OF THE SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE,(Pages 1133-34).]
http://gunshowonthenet.blogspot.com/2013/05/b...

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#148 May 1, 2013
We are wrote:
<quoted text>
quite aware of the right wing fascist elements, like yourself
Are you aware there are people with brains, unlike yourself?
you mean

Santa Fe, NM

#149 May 1, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you aware there are people with brains, unlike yourself?
unlike my functioning brain, there are people like yourself that fill that space with oatmeal and paranoid delusions?

Yes, I know you are out there: armed, full of irrational hate and terribly confused.

Spam on fool.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#150 May 1, 2013
you mean wrote:
<quoted text>
unlike my functioning brain, there are people like yourself that fill that space with oatmeal and paranoid delusions?
Yes, I know you are out there: armed, full of irrational hate and terribly confused.
Spam on fool.
Drooled the hermaphrodite.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#151 May 1, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you aware there are people with brains, unlike yourself?
Do you know most people here a capable of individual thought, GayDavy?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#152 May 1, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"This is a most invaluable
150 year old spam.

flagged, quote miner.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#153 May 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know most people here a capable of individual thought, GayDavy?
Excluding you of course, little doggie. All you do is follow the orders of your masters.
moronfinder

Wirtz, VA

#154 May 1, 2013
you mean wrote:
<quoted text>
unlike my functioning brain, there are people like yourself that fill that space with oatmeal and paranoid delusions?
Yes, I know you are out there: armed, full of irrational hate and terribly confused.
Spam on fool.
Well said. I couldn't agree more.
moronfinder

Wirtz, VA

#155 May 2, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Excluding you of course, little doggie. All you do is follow the orders of your masters.
Kinda like you living according to centuries old, irrelevant ideals. Pot calling the kettle black?

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#156 May 2, 2013
moronfinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Kinda like you living according to centuries old, irrelevant ideals. Pot calling the kettle black?
Not quite MF. The Right to Self-Defense/Preservation NEVER ceases. It belongs to EVERY creature at ALL times. And NO man made 'law' can remove it.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#157 May 2, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not quite MF. The Right to Self-Defense/Preservation NEVER ceases.
Selling firearms to felons isn't a right over here in the USA, GayDavy.

Maybe if you had EVER lifted a finger for this country, you would have something invested and you could learn all the words to the Second Amendment?

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#158 May 2, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Selling firearms to felons isn't a right over here in the USA, GayDavy.
Maybe if you had EVER lifted a finger for this country, you would have something invested and you could learn all the words to the Second Amendment?
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".

To bad for you, eh troll?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Violent Crime Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Becky Johnson Nance 1 min Fred 2
News Fatal shot in San Francisco pier shooting was r... 7 min Perry Mason 4
News Tolle murder trial begins 2 hr loose lip 3
News Police: Suspect in deadly drive-by shooting arr... 6 hr FunnyHoney 1
News El Paso police make 100 arrests in crackdown in... 7 hr huey goins 2
News Wal-Mart to end sales of assault rifles in U.S.... 13 hr Garofolo 3
News 'Black Lives' activists detail goals 13 hr Prep-for-Dep 65
More from around the web