Credibility concerns in Missouri shoo...

Credibility concerns in Missouri shooting probe

There are 19 comments on the Cybercast News Service story from Aug 18, 2014, titled Credibility concerns in Missouri shooting probe. In it, Cybercast News Service reports that:

After a week of violent clashes between police and protesters, Missouri authorities leading the investigation into the police shooting death of an unarmed black teenager are increasingly facing questions about whether their eventual findings can be seen as credible among residents who are highly distrustful of those in charge.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Cybercast News Service.

Since: Mar 09

The Left Coast

#1 Aug 18, 2014
The only fair way would be to let Al Sharpton decide what actually happened.
Cordwainer Trout

Greensburg, KY

#2 Aug 18, 2014
The crazy, illiterate lying scum Marxists get to make up more conspiracy theories. All information coming to light says all the claims of those rationalizing their looting and arson have been wrong.

“i hope we can change this!”

Since: Aug 08

usa

#3 Aug 18, 2014
between the "witnesses", the cops and the media there is no credibility ANYWHERE in this clusterfck!
fyi

Teague, TX

#4 Aug 18, 2014
Most Americans don't know the difference between Knowledge and their Beliefs, so credibility is to much to ask.
I can read

Edinburgh, UK

#5 Aug 18, 2014
These events should tell you that black or white, in uniform or not, it's being an American that makes you dishonest and scummy.

If that doesn't, check out the polarised response to it right here on topix.

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#7 Aug 18, 2014
I can read wrote:
These events should tell you that black or white, in uniform or not, it's being an American that makes you dishonest and scummy.
If that doesn't, check out the polarised response to it right here on topix.
Go on wit'ya!
I've read Dickens and visited the graves of my ancestors in Eire, their property stolen and historical records destroyed by the likes of you.
But, tell us about how the UK fared in India, South Africa, Rhodesia, Southeast Asia and the USA. Tell us what language you'd be speaking if the "dishonest and scummy" Americans didn't save your bacon in the 1940's.
Tell us what makes you feel so superior.
I can read

Edinburgh, UK

#8 Aug 19, 2014
Not living in a police state makes me feel superior.

Not having such massive racial instability helps too.

AS for which language we'd be speaking if the US didn't join either world war: English. Both times you only joined once the winner had already been decided.

Russia lost 60 million people in WW2, the US lost 0.5% of that. An almost negligable contribution in comparison.
not a liberal idiot

Ridgedale, MO

#9 Aug 19, 2014
I can read wrote:
Russia lost 60 million people in WW2.
Bullshit. The entire number of casualties in WW2 was 60 million. The ones from Russia were only a fraction of that. Get your facts straight.
fyi

Teague, TX

#12 Aug 19, 2014
ya gota love diversity, religious, sectarian or racial ...(include tribal, national etc. etc.)... "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from {insert one form of diversity} religious conviction."

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#13 Aug 19, 2014
I can read wrote:
Not living in a police state makes me feel superior.
Not having such massive racial instability helps too.
AS for which language we'd be speaking if the US didn't join either world war: English. Both times you only joined once the winner had already been decided.
Russia lost 60 million people in WW2, the US lost 0.5% of that. An almost negligable contribution in comparison.
It's simple to avoid racial instability in a homogenous state wherein almost 90% of the population is of the same race (White). Not so easy when almost 40% are various minorities.

The UK certainly installed a police state in Eire, and subsequently in the USA before we insisted on, fought for and won independence. Same in India, although by different means. The UK has a much longer legacy of having people living in a police state. Perhaps you simply don't notice; there are more police per capita in the UK than in the USA.
Chicopee

Danbury, CT

#14 Aug 19, 2014
I can read wrote:
Not living in a police state makes me feel superior.
Not having such massive racial instability helps too.
AS for which language we'd be speaking if the US didn't join either world war: English. Both times you only joined once the winner had already been decided.
Russia lost 60 million people in WW2, the US lost 0.5% of that. An almost negligable contribution in comparison.
Russia lost about 26 million in WWII.

That includes murdered civilians, soldiers, POW's in forced labor camps and those who died of famine.

Get a clue.
I can read

Edinburgh, UK

#15 Aug 20, 2014
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
It's simple to avoid racial instability in a homogenous state wherein almost 90% of the population is of the same race (White). Not so easy when almost 40% are various minorities.
The UK certainly installed a police state in Eire, and subsequently in the USA before we insisted on, fought for and won independence. Same in India, although by different means. The UK has a much longer legacy of having people living in a police state. Perhaps you simply don't notice; there are more police per capita in the UK than in the USA.
You might want to study your war of independence some. Police state?

It was started after the 7 years war which was itself started by an american named george washington who decided on a taliban style sodier ambush of french troops on french soil.

We paid over 1m on that war which in those days was a lot of money. Straight after this war you idiots started and we rescued you form you decided to stop paying taxes, despite the tax bill per year for all the US combined being less that 1/1000th of what we spent saving your asses from the french.

You immediately then started begging the french for help, despite the last war between us being the US' fault.

Hillariously though that meant the royal navy stopped protecting US shipping and you lost a fortune to the barbary pirates. The cost of setting up your own navy to keep your ships safe ended up costing hundreds of times more than what you used to pay in taxes when we provided that service.

So in fact your war against a 'police state' was a criminal enterprise against the only people responsible for the fact you still existed.

The US is so embarrassed about this that you have to indoctinate your children to beleive something else in school. E.g they pretend the 7 years war didn't happen and only teach the part that happened on the US continent and you call it the french indian war. Also, despite us sending 100X as much helping you as we collected from you in taxes, every american kid has to be taught those taxes were unfair.

You guys just can't handle the truth, huh?

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#16 Aug 20, 2014
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
You might want to study your war of independence some. Police state?
It was started after the 7 years war which was itself started by an american named george washington who decided on a taliban style sodier ambush of french troops on french soil.
We paid over 1m on that war which in those days was a lot of money. Straight after this war you idiots started and we rescued you form you decided to stop paying taxes, despite the tax bill per year for all the US combined being less that 1/1000th of what we spent saving your asses from the french.
You immediately then started begging the french for help, despite the last war between us being the US' fault.
Hillariously though that meant the royal navy stopped protecting US shipping and you lost a fortune to the barbary pirates. The cost of setting up your own navy to keep your ships safe ended up costing hundreds of times more than what you used to pay in taxes when we provided that service.
So in fact your war against a 'police state' was a criminal enterprise against the only people responsible for the fact you still existed.
The US is so embarrassed about this that you have to indoctinate your children to beleive something else in school. E.g they pretend the 7 years war didn't happen and only teach the part that happened on the US continent and you call it the french indian war. Also, despite us sending 100X as much helping you as we collected from you in taxes, every american kid has to be taught those taxes were unfair.
You guys just can't handle the truth, huh?
LOL,
Leave it to a Scotsman to measure the cost of freedom in Pounds.

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#17 Aug 20, 2014
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
You might want to study your war of independence some. Police state?
It was started after the 7 years war which was itself started by an american named george washington who decided on a taliban style sodier ambush of french troops on french soil.
We paid over 1m on that war which in those days was a lot of money. Straight after this war you idiots started and we rescued you form you decided to stop paying taxes, despite the tax bill per year for all the US combined being less that 1/1000th of what we spent saving your asses from the french.
You immediately then started begging the french for help, despite the last war between us being the US' fault.
Hillariously though that meant the royal navy stopped protecting US shipping and you lost a fortune to the barbary pirates. The cost of setting up your own navy to keep your ships safe ended up costing hundreds of times more than what you used to pay in taxes when we provided that service.
So in fact your war against a 'police state' was a criminal enterprise against the only people responsible for the fact you still existed.
The US is so embarrassed about this that you have to indoctinate your children to beleive something else in school. E.g they pretend the 7 years war didn't happen and only teach the part that happened on the US continent and you call it the french indian war. Also, despite us sending 100X as much helping you as we collected from you in taxes, every american kid has to be taught those taxes were unfair.
You guys just can't handle the truth, huh?
Taxes weren't the problem as much as the Colonists lack of representation in Parliment ABOUT those taxes. Oh,and that batsh1t crazy King George III...... That old European affliction of the Peerage,inbreeding.
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#18 Aug 20, 2014
Very few people in America agreed with treason against the Crown. The great majority of people resented and opposed the revolutionary forces and their leaders. After the success of the revolution, the revolutionists committed a reign of terror, hanging men, women and children and deporting many, stealing their property. The imposition of that type of fear led to the US being considerably backward to the British Christian anti-slavery laws and actions, so much so, that one in every three persons in NY city was a slave.

The intellectual scum having so much impact on realizing independence went to France to foment actions against those helping the revolution, instituting a greater reign of terror there.
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#19 Aug 20, 2014
I can read wrote:
Not living in a police state makes me feel superior.
Not having such massive racial instability helps too.
AS for which language we'd be speaking if the US didn't join either world war: English. Both times you only joined once the winner had already been decided.
Russia lost 60 million people in WW2, the US lost 0.5% of that. An almost negligable contribution in comparison.
Typo, or not, the reality of the difference is significant. Most argue between a 20 and 30 million figure, which remains an astounding figure. American jealousy of the Soviet Union people actually winning WWII for the rest of the world has never been overcome here. America didn't recognize a 20 million figure until about twenty years ago. American schools continue the fantasy that America industry won the war by supplying the Soviets. They disregard the operative Soviet industry, putting out very effective military hardware. American hardware aid sat in Vladivostok. Even most of the handheld weaponry and ammunition used against the German armies were Russian made.
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#20 Aug 20, 2014
I can read wrote:
Not living in a police state makes me feel superior.
Not having such massive racial instability helps too.
AS for which language we'd be speaking if the US didn't join either world war: English. Both times you only joined once the winner had already been decided.
Russia lost 60 million people in WW2, the US lost 0.5% of that. An almost negligable contribution in comparison.
One thing about the "massive racial instability" however... It's not as bad as the Marxists would like you to believe. Whereas, the profound stupidity of a people allowing so many radical Muslims into their island country, that they have to allow them to continue mutilating females and give them their own courts to keep them from bombing the underground, that is indeed profoundly stupid and suicidal. Britain has to kiss inferior asses to give the illusion of safety. How much time do the Brits have left as a nation, when they destroy their own jurisprudence?
I can read

Edinburgh, UK

#21 Aug 20, 2014
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
<quoted text>
One thing about the "massive racial instability" however... It's not as bad as the Marxists would like you to believe. Whereas, the profound stupidity of a people allowing so many radical Muslims into their island country, that they have to allow them to continue mutilating females and give them their own courts to keep them from bombing the underground, that is indeed profoundly stupid and suicidal. Britain has to kiss inferior asses to give the illusion of safety. How much time do the Brits have left as a nation, when they destroy their own jurisprudence?
It's probably lucky none of that stuff is happening really.

For instance the 'Sharia courts' Americans seem so misinformed about are just as legal in the US as they are in the UK. They have been for the entirety of your nations history.

In both the US and UK, civil disputes can be settled in any way as long as all sides agree. If you want to use sharia law, roman law or talmudic law you have that choice.

I take it you want to change that? Wouldn't that be destroying your jurisprudence and taking away some personal rights and freedoms?
not a liberal idiot

Brownwood, TX

#22 Aug 21, 2014
Looks like old Cordwanker is still pissed that America kicked Britain's ass and gained her own independence. Get over it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Violent Crime Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Tyer Calls For $1M Police Department... 6 min Donut hole for a ... 11
News Kenneth J. Otto Sr. Arrested for the Murder of ... (May '07) 1 hr Mark Musial 9
News Pistol used in Trayvon Martin shooting to be au... 2 hr WelbyMD 113
News How much is Gliniewicz investigation costing ta... (Nov '15) 5 hr fox lake 20
News Shreveport police shoot 34-year-old man (Apr '07) 10 hr Kimyatta 67
News Police warn 'assassin game' could have deadly c... 21 hr dial M 4 Murder 1
News They Shot a Baby Named MiracleBy Michael Daly Mon binaries 1
More from around the web