Ohio Teacher Quits Over Catholic Cont...

Ohio Teacher Quits Over Catholic Contract

There are 129 comments on the EDGE story from May 10, 2014, titled Ohio Teacher Quits Over Catholic Contract. In it, EDGE reports that:

A veteran Catholic school teacher in Cincinnati whose son is gay is quitting in protest of a new controversial contract specifying violations of church doctrine.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at EDGE.

Christsharians on the DL

Philadelphia, PA

#41 May 15, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
According to The Genome Project, human life originated in Africa. All humans are genetically related and compatible.
You didn't address my point. Just like your non helpful reminder about the buybull didn't address the point.

I guess you're just going to spew vaguely disconnected facts all night.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#42 May 16, 2014
Christsharians on the DL wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't address my point. Just like your non helpful reminder about the buybull didn't address the point.
I guess you're just going to spew vaguely disconnected facts all night.
Looks like you don't have a point.

Time to run along Junior.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#43 May 16, 2014
Christsharians on the DL wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't address my point. Just like your non helpful reminder about the buybull didn't address the point.
I guess you're just going to spew vaguely disconnected facts all night.
I rebuke your childish behavior.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#44 May 17, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Sexist nonsense. The appropriate partner for a gay or lesbian is a person of the same sex. 2. Why is it your business anyway?
1. Good for you.
2. How many times do I have to say I don't care who your partner is?
It would be great if everyone just minded their own business, especially gays that try to get elementary school classrooms full of straight kids to read gay storybooks.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#45 May 17, 2014
Wondering wrote:
It would be great if everyone just minded their own business, especially gays that try to get elementary school classrooms full of straight kids to read gay storybooks.
Of course, no one is trying to do that.
There are books that address bullying which include such stories, however it is impossible to address bullying without addressing those who are at risk specifically. Doing so in no way advances any agenda beyond preventing bullying.

Tell me again about the Parker's failed court case, Wondering.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#46 May 17, 2014
lides wrote:
however it is impossible to address bullying without addressing those who are at risk specifically.
Only for the simple minded. Hey, that's you.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#47 May 17, 2014
Wondering wrote:
Only for the simple minded. Hey, that's you.
Wondering, that was simply a stupid thing to say. Then again, it is you.

Bullying cannot be addressed without addressing those specifically at risk. The objective is to remove the stigma before one is victimized.

I think that Jesus called it treating your neighbor as yourself.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#48 May 17, 2014
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullying cannot be addressed without addressing those specifically at risk.
Those specifically at risk are children. I know, that makes too much sense for you to understand.

How many children do you have?
How many parent/teacher nights did you attend?
What is your specific expertise on bullying?
Did you attend any classes on bullying?
Do you have any first hand experience with your kids bullying or being bullied?
Do you know all the reasons kids are bullied?

I have a feeling your answers are 'none' and 'no.'
Leave bullying to those grown-ups that have to deal with it.
Pat Robertson s Fatwass

Philadelphia, PA

#49 May 17, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like you don't have a point.
You weren't able to understand my point.

_Obviously_ no one here thinks I'm a buybull literalist. Except you as indicated by your confused posts.

Again, my point was that whether you follow the Adam and Eve story or whether you accept the Theory of Evolution, the present billions of people came from two or very few (early) people.

It was a joke about humanity being systematically inbred, no matter which explanation for humans you choose. That's why your drearily pedantic posts about your limited understanding of science were beside the point. Because my joke about inbreeding applies to either "explanation."

There. No you have no excuse. But you'll find one.
Pat Robertson s Fatwass

Philadelphia, PA

#50 May 17, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
How many times do I have to say I don't care who your partner is?....It would be great if everyone just minded their own business, especially gays that try to get elementary school classrooms full of straight kids to read gay storybooks.
1. Hey psychosexually sick pos, no one is working for your approval, you stupid bigot. It's not about "partners" and whether you fixate on them. It's about equal rights for lgbt people in all contexts.

2. Hey sub human filth, that will be fine when we equally get heterosexuality and heterosexuals out of classroom books. You garbage.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#51 May 17, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Good for you.
2. How many times do I have to say I don't care who your partner is?
It would be great if everyone just minded their own business, especially gays that try to get elementary school classrooms full of straight kids to read gay storybooks.
WTF?

Is this supposed to make any sense?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#52 May 17, 2014
Pat Robertson s Fatwass wrote:
<quoted text>
You weren't able to understand my point.
_Obviously_ no one here thinks I'm a buybull literalist. Except you as indicated by your confused posts.
Again, my point was that whether you follow the Adam and Eve story or whether you accept the Theory of Evolution, the present billions of people came from two or very few (early) people.
It was a joke about humanity being systematically inbred, no matter which explanation for humans you choose. That's why your drearily pedantic posts about your limited understanding of science were beside the point. Because my joke about inbreeding applies to either "explanation."
There. No you have no excuse. But you'll find one.
Thanks for the clarification.

Where is the line for inbreeding given the fact humans and other species have evolved from few to many with much diversity. The Bible is completely irrelevant.
Pat Robertson s Fatwass

Philadelphia, PA

#53 May 17, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is the line for inbreeding given the fact humans and other species have evolved from few to many with much diversity. The Bible is completely irrelevant.
The joke works within the framework of Adam and Eve, too. That was the point - it works whether you believe in Evolution or do not, because in both there's a whole lot of inbreeding in the human race.

There was a buybull person in the thread. Mocking the story of Adam and Eve by saying it is tantamount to a whole lot of inbreeding is not completely irrelevant. Of course I was also mocking homo sapiens.

You're slow is all. That is nettlesome.
Trotsky Marx n Lenin

Pittsfield, MA

#54 May 17, 2014
Christsharians on the DL wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't address my point. Just like your non helpful reminder about the buybull didn't address the point.
I guess you're just going to spew vaguely disconnected facts all night.
YOU ARE A MORON! YOU ARE A MORON! YOU ARE A MORON! YOU ARE A MORON!
YOU ARE A PIG! YOU HAVE NO VALUES! YOU ARE AN ANIMAL! YOU ARE CORRUPT! YOU ARE A SLUT! ONE NEEDS NO RELIGION, NO BUYBILL, NO CHURCH, NO MOSQUE, TO KNOW YOU ARE A SADIST AND A HOAR!

Pornography has been the war on women for decades. The stability of mother and the family structure has deteriorated over the course of decades. But of course who runs the porn industry? Who insults those marriages and families that succeed? Who, also manufactures underage pornography? Who runs the bank? Who runs the media? Who has by far too much influence in your govt? Who has our military been abused for in the many unjust wars in the Middles East?
Egggzactly....
Pat Robertson s Fatwass

Philadelphia, PA

#55 May 17, 2014
Jesus, that thing that posts is all over the place. I mean politically. I don't even mean in terms of its mood disorder.

I guess it likes getting replies.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#56 May 18, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
Those specifically at risk are children. I know, that makes too much sense for you to understand.
How many children do you have?
How many parent/teacher nights did you attend?
What is your specific expertise on bullying?
Did you attend any classes on bullying?
Do you have any first hand experience with your kids bullying or being bullied?
Do you know all the reasons kids are bullied?
I have a feeling your answers are 'none' and 'no.'
Leave bullying to those grown-ups that have to deal with it.
Here's a clue, brainless. None of your questions are relevant, because we all as a society deal with the aftermath of bullying. When luddites like yourself wish to address the problem by burying your head in the sand, which is to say not addressing it at all, we as a society lose.

So, no.
None.
I have direct experience with bullying, having been one who was bullied.
Yes.
See #1.
No one knows all the reasons kid, or anyone else are bullied.

The last question was truly stupid, and all of the questions were gratuitous and irrelevant.

Congratulations, Wondering. You've proven, once again, that a rock is more intelligent than you are.
Trotsky Marx n Lenin

Pittsfield, MA

#57 May 18, 2014
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's a clue, brainless. None of your questions are relevant, because we all as a society deal with the aftermath of bullying. When luddites like yourself wish to address the problem by burying your head in the sand, which is to say not addressing it at all, we as a society lose.
So, no.
None.
I have direct experience with bullying, having been one who was bullied.
Yes.
See #1.
No one knows all the reasons kid, or anyone else are bullied.
The last question was truly stupid, and all of the questions were gratuitous and irrelevant.
Congratulations, Wondering. You've proven, once again, that a rock is more intelligent than you are.
The govt is the biggest bully of them all. You included.
Harvey Milk on a stamp?
Lil Piggy you.

:o)
Fire in Odessa

Pittsfield, MA

#58 May 18, 2014
Democrats and Republicans. Perfect strangers with one master.

Do not get on your rooftops to see, for he will have no mercy, and yet destroy themselves from within.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#59 May 18, 2014
lides wrote:
I have direct experience with bullying, having been one who was bullied.
I'm not surprised.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#60 May 18, 2014
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
There are books that address bullying which include such stories,
Name one.

In Alameda County it was "And Tango Makes Three," a book about gay penguins. It does not address bullying. In Lexington it was "Who's In A Family" and "King & King." They did not address bullying.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Transgender Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Meet the Two Transgender Women Who Won Primary ... 51 min Anita Bryant s Jihad 17
News The Latest: Obama pledges federal support in fl... 2 hr Senseamillion 16
News Judge: Indiana must list both moms for children... 8 hr Todd 1
where guys and gays hangout in jeddah (Sep '10) 8 hr soft fun panty ass 2,196
goodlooking filipino offering massage in jeddah (Jul '13) 10 hr jeddah_bottom69 705
Looking old top or any bottom in Al-ahsa 11 hr sjeddahmrrr 4
bottom in Jubail (Jun '13) 12 hr Edlow 118
More from around the web