Gay Couples Entitled To Equal Family ...

Gay Couples Entitled To Equal Family Health Coverage, Fed Says

There are 32 comments on the New Hampshire Public Radio - story from Mar 16, 2014, titled Gay Couples Entitled To Equal Family Health Coverage, Fed Says. In it, New Hampshire Public Radio - reports that:

What insurers offer to spouses in a traditional marriage, they must make available to same-sex couples, the federal government said Friday.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at New Hampshire Public Radio -.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#21 Mar 16, 2014
Sen Rick Saintpornum wrote:
<quoted text>
You do all the time. And you oppose equal lgbt rights, and wish to silence those who petition publicly for equal rights.
You apply double standards regarding the conduct of heterosexuals versus the conduct of lgbt people.
You're a stinking, ignorant, lying bigot. But it's a good sign that you finally feel a need to try and pretend you are not an abject bigot. It means you homophobic freeeks are losing at last.
Time to really shove equal rights in your whining, fundie and sexually sick faces, you stupid filth.
What I want is to allow those who disagree with homosexuality on religious and/or moral grounds to be allowed freedom from it for themselves and their families.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#22 Mar 16, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
What I want is to allow those who disagree with homosexuality on religious and/or moral grounds to be allowed freedom from it for themselves and their families.
How in the heck would they obtain freedom from sexual orientation?
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#23 Mar 16, 2014
Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
How in the heck would they obtain freedom from sexual orientation?
Gay activists wouldn't be allowed infiltrate public elementary schools with the blessing of openly gay judges without an opt out provision. Easy.
Gremlin

Louisville, KY

#24 Mar 16, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
Gay activists wouldn't be allowed infiltrate public elementary schools with the blessing of openly gay judges without an opt out provision. Easy.
Where is this being done? You repeat this baloney over and over again......isn't it time you show proof to back it up?

“Common courtesy, isn't”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#25 Mar 16, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
What I want is to allow those who disagree with homosexuality on religious and/or moral grounds to be allowed freedom from it for themselves and their families.
Everyone in this country is free to "disagree" with homosexuality on religious and/or moral grounds, and they have the freedom to totally disengage from it within the privacy of their own homes. But they don't have the right to dictate what happens in public space, unless a law is being broken.

Similarly, I disagree with alcoholic behavior on moral and emotional grounds, and I don't want booze around me or my family. In fact, there is no alcohol in my home, and I don't allow people who are drinking to cross my threshold. But I don't have the right to tell anyone they can't drink at a restaurant or a stadium, unless they're breaking the law in doing so. If someone pops a beer while picnicking at the lake, I don't get to tell them they can't do that. All I can do is choose whether or not I want to stay or leave.

Same difference.

“Common courtesy, isn't”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#26 Mar 16, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
Gay activists wouldn't be allowed infiltrate public elementary schools with the blessing of openly gay judges without an opt out provision. Easy.
That's a silly statement. If someone is "infiltrating" an organization, they're blending in secretly and you wouldn't know they're there.

But I'll tell you one thing ... if I believed that a child of mine were in a dangerous situation of any kind at a public school, I would remove them from it immediately and either send them to a private school or home school them.

Wouldn't you?

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#27 Mar 16, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
What I want is to allow those who disagree with homosexuality on religious and/or moral grounds to be allowed freedom from it for themselves and their families.
So, as long as YOUR freedoms are allowed to trample others' freedom, you'll be happy?

Don't you recall the words of Dr. Martin Luther King? I am paraphrasing, but if one person is discriminated against, we all are.

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#28 Mar 16, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
Gay activists wouldn't be allowed infiltrate public elementary schools with the blessing of openly gay judges without an opt out provision. Easy.
Cletus, if you fired all the LGBT school employees, most school districts would need to close down, pronto.

I worked at LA Unified for nearly 20 years and there were LOADS of LGBT teachers, administrators, clerical, and so on staff. I bet it is this at most other school districts in the country.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#29 Mar 16, 2014
Curteese wrote:
<quoted text>So, as long as YOUR freedoms are allowed to trample others' freedom, you'll be happy?
That's what you want.
Sen Rick Saintpornum

Philadelphia, PA

#30 Mar 16, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
What I want is to allow those who disagree with homosexuality on religious and/or moral grounds to be allowed freedom from it for themselves and their families.
You may be ignorant bigots, although educated people may shun you.

You may not discriminate in places of public accommodations, though, you stupid bigot.

BTW, you claim (lie) that you're not religious. I don't know what "moral" objection you have to variations in sexual orientation without religion.

You're merely sexually ill and a bigot. And stupid as all get out.
Sen Rick Saintpornum

Philadelphia, PA

#31 Mar 16, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
Gay activists wouldn't be allowed infiltrate public elementary schools with the blessing of openly gay judges without an opt out provision. Easy.
You filth, you object to every single aspect of equal lgbt rights and every public evidence of lgbt people. Don't make it sound like you have some thought out objection concerning educational policies, you lying refuse.
car mat

Milledgeville, GA

#32 Apr 8, 2014
any gay guy want to take a pole

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Transgender Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Man Beat 2 Transgender Women Who Tried to Enter... 1 hr Phyllis Schlafly ... 32
News Michele Bachmann Clinic: Where You Can Pray Awa... (Jul '11) 5 hr Coultergeist 61
News As a trans Muslim, I used to feel vulnerable al... 7 hr BB Board 1
News Tennessee transgender bathroom bill fails in Se... 12 hr TerriB1 1
News Americans oppose bathroom laws limiting transge... Wed YouDidntBuildThat 229
News YouTube apologizes after feature blocks LGBTQ c... Wed Christians In Na... 1
News He's a straight man, but straight women won't d... Wed Tre H 15
More from around the web