Transgender Student in Women's Locker...

Transgender Student in Women's Locker Room Raises Uproar

There are 352 comments on the KSFO AM 560 story from Nov 4, 2012, titled Transgender Student in Women's Locker Room Raises Uproar. In it, KSFO AM 560 reports that:

The decision to allow a transgender 45-year-old college student who identifies as a woman but has male genitalia to use the women's locker room has raised a fracas among parents and faith-based organizations, who say children as young as 6 years old use the locker room.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KSFO AM 560.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#305 Jan 29, 2013
George thth Great wrote:
<quoted text>
... shower in the opposite locker room....
Your bigotry and failure to comprehend the nature of things has already been noted. No need for you to continue to prove you're an uneducated bigot.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#306 Jan 29, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Your bigotry and failure to comprehend the nature of things has already been noted. No need for you to continue to prove you're an uneducated bigot.
You continue to amuse me.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#307 Jan 30, 2013
The problem is...this transgender claims it, the penis, is just a waste disposal unit. Meaning that she, and her friends should feel free to shower with others with the same 'waste disposal units.' However, she and her friends are not comfortable with that environment making it more than a 'waste disposal units.' Remarkably, they say it's a just a 'waste disposal unit' while showing 'their' units, and in this case flaunting it, to females. My suggestion is...if that's the case then why not COVER UP or shower in the men's room? After all...it's just a WASTE DISPOSAL unit and not sexual. Never mind that many of us believe it's more than that but THESE people believe it...so why do they not give in? It's more than that...proof that some Transgenders must show and tell to make a point, thus being selfish, instead of 'womaning' up and protecting the innocent females, including children, after all they are one of YOU. Disgusting....and selfish.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#308 Jan 30, 2013
George the Great wrote:
The problem is...this transgender claims it, the penis, is just a waste disposal unit. Meaning that she, and her friends should feel free to shower with others with the same 'waste disposal units.' However, she and her friends are not comfortable with that environment making it more than a 'waste disposal units.' Remarkably, they say it's a just a 'waste disposal unit' while showing 'their' units, and in this case flaunting it, to females. My suggestion is...if that's the case then why not COVER UP or shower in the men's room? After all...it's just a WASTE DISPOSAL unit and not sexual. Never mind that many of us believe it's more than that but THESE people believe it...so why do they not give in? It's more than that...proof that some Transgenders must show and tell to make a point, thus being selfish, instead of 'womaning' up and protecting the innocent females, including children, after all they are one of YOU. Disgusting....and selfish.
"this transgendered?" Where is your evidence that I am what you claim I am?

I know you have none, because you are a liar trying to justify your hatred using any lame excuse you can. You know it has nothing to do with nudity, it's just you want something to complain about, that's all. Bigots like you need to be institutionalized for life.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#309 Jan 30, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
"this transgendered?" Where is your evidence that I am what you claim I am?
I know you have none, because you are a liar trying to justify your hatred using any lame excuse you can. You know it has nothing to do with nudity, it's just you want something to complain about, that's all. Bigots like you need to be institutionalized for life.
I have no evidence that you are a transgender like you do with claiming I am a Christian fundamentalist. It is about nudity...society has been showering with knowledge that they are showering homosexuals for the past four or five decades. People don't have the problem with sexuality...it's about body parts. If sexuality wasn't the issue then this transgender woman wouldn't have had a problem showering in the male locker room. PROOF...check mate. You seem to take the side of the transgender but ignore others...who think along the same lines. The transgender believes she is a women in a male body...the opponents view her a male with male parts. You are a bigot for not understanding the other side and willing to debate this topic without labels. You, girlfriend, have issues in not willing to open up to honest debate without throwing out hurtful labels. I have to point out again that this transgender 'lady' felt the need to shower in the ladies locker room due to her SEXUALITY...if not that she would be showering in the males locker room. You people, emphasis added, are trying to hijack society and WE will defend it. Even the most liberal individuals, Evergreen State College, believes that this transgender student was WRONG. Try fighting that.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#310 Jan 31, 2013
George the Great wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no evidence that you are a transgender like you do with claiming I am a Christian fundamentalist. It is about nudity...society has been showering with knowledge that they are showering homosexuals for the past four or five decades. People don't have the problem with sexuality...it's about body parts. If sexuality wasn't the issue then this transgender woman wouldn't have had a problem showering in the male locker room. PROOF...check mate. You seem to take the side of the transgender but ignore others...who think along the same lines. The transgender believes she is a women in a male body...the opponents view her a male with male parts. You are a bigot for not understanding the other side and willing to debate this topic without labels. You, girlfriend, have issues in not willing to open up to honest debate without throwing out hurtful labels. I have to point out again that this transgender 'lady' felt the need to shower in the ladies locker room due to her SEXUALITY...if not that she would be showering in the males locker room. You people, emphasis added, are trying to hijack society and WE will defend it. Even the most liberal individuals, Evergreen State College, believes that this transgender student was WRONG. Try fighting that.
Nudity is not sexual nor inherently "damaging" to young people. So no, it's about sex to you. Stop lying about that.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#311 Jan 31, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Nudity is not sexual nor inherently "damaging" to young people. So no, it's about sex to you. Stop lying about that.
Again..why not have transgenders shower with people with the 'same' parts then...that's if sexuality is not involved. Body parts are damaging to younger people; especially those that flaunt it like this woman did. Why not cover up and protect others that don't want to see male junk in a female locker room...you have yet, three months later haven't explained that part. It's about the transgender and not others. EQUAL RIGHTS! Except for those that don't want to see a male tool show in a female locker room. Thus the majority.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#312 Jan 31, 2013
Thus, Kitten, why does this transgender woman feel the need to show her stuff in a woman's locker room...if sexuality is not the issue? Explain that...don't worry. I've been asking that question for three months. Your response...I'm a bigot.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#313 Feb 1, 2013
George the Great wrote:
Thus, Kitten, why does this transgender woman feel the need to show her stuff in a woman's locker room...if sexuality is not the issue? Explain that...don't worry. I've been asking that question for three months. Your response...I'm a bigot.
Why do you feel the need to create an issue, invent one, to persecute someone just because they are different. Why do you hunt witches?
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#314 Feb 2, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you feel the need to create an issue, invent one, to persecute someone just because they are different. Why do you hunt witches?
I didn't create the issue...the transgender woman did displaying her male parts in front of children at the liberal Evergreen State College locker room and sauna. If the transgender student decided to cover up, her lower regions, then the issue wouldn't have been created. But she decided to 'flaunt' it...remind you this was at a liberal college that decided to allow transgender students to shower in opposing locker rooms....after the incident college decided that transgender students need to cover up. This is from the most liberal college, for which some people are calling for restricting their funding due to their totally biased education, in our state...they agree with me. They need to cover up. So what is your problem with covering up?
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#315 Feb 2, 2013
But nice try Kitten into making this a 'my' issue and side tracking from the original topic. Typical liberal...can't defend the issue or answer the question.

BTW..you still haven't answered the question...why not just cover up and protect others that don't agree with your beliefs, even in this state the majority? Can you answer that?
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#316 Feb 2, 2013
and I am continuing my thoughts...we have public school teachers that have to hide their crosses from view because it might offend others...why not hide male parts from innocents? Why are you and your sister different?
anna

United States

#317 Feb 2, 2013
George the Great wrote:
and I am continuing my thoughts...we have public school teachers that have to hide their crosses from view because it might offend others...why not hide male parts from innocents? Why are you and your sister different?
116 year old law. Only ane state left with such law. http://aclj.org/free-speech-2/time-to-end-dis...
anna

United States

#318 Feb 2, 2013
The protestant church for its religious garb law.
The court's ruling did not end
protests against the employment
of nuns in North Dakota public
schools. During the 1940s, for
example, the legislature twice
failed to pass antigarb bills. In
1948 an organization known as
the Committee for the Separation
of Church and State (CSCS),
primarily comprised of
Protestant ministers, led a
campaign to have an anti-garb
initiative put to the voters. The
real issue was not the clothing
worn by the sisters but rather a
fear that nuns would impose a
sectarian influence on
schoolchildren and that the
Catholic Church would
eventually dominate public
education. After collecting more
than 100,000 signatures, the cscs
filed a petition with the secretary
of state, and the initiative was
placed on the ballot for the 1948
election.

In response to the cscs's initiative
drive, a group called the
Committee for the Defense of
Civil Rights organized to battle
the anti-garb bill. Using leaflets,
pamphlets, and speeches, both
sides waged an intense public
campaign, and voters thronged to
the polls–10,000 more turned out
for the 1948 election than for the
previous gubernatorial election.
Despite more than 50,000 non-Catholics voting against the
initiative, voters passed North
Dakota's anti-garb bill.
anna

United States

#319 Feb 2, 2013
That should have been

Thank the protestant church for Nebraskas religous garb law
anna

United States

#320 Feb 2, 2013

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#321 Feb 2, 2013
George the Great wrote:
and I am continuing my thoughts...we have public school teachers that have to hide their crosses from view because it might offend others...why not hide male parts from innocents? Why are you and your sister different?
Fallacy, false equivocation. You sound like Alex Jones.
anna

United States

#322 Feb 2, 2013
George the Great wrote:
and I am continuing my thoughts...we have public school teachers that have to hide their crosses from view because it might offend others...why not hide male parts from innocents? Why are you and your sister different?
after more research on a subject that i found interestimg, it is non Catholic Christians who were, and are responsible for laws that restrict teachers from wearing crosses out in the open.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#323 Feb 2, 2013
anna wrote:
<quoted text> after more research on a subject that i found interestimg, it is non Catholic Christians who were, and are responsible for laws that restrict teachers from wearing crosses out in the open.
And how does that refute my argument? They are still restricted from wearing them so not to offend anyone. Why not restrict other parts of society as well from offending people?

“Sara for Fun (( M 2 F ))”

Since: Aug 10

Bahrain

#324 Feb 2, 2013
George the Great wrote:
The problem is...this transgender claims it, the penis, is just a waste disposal unit. Meaning that she, and her friends should feel free to shower with others with the same 'waste disposal units.' However, she and her friends are not comfortable with that environment making it more than a 'waste disposal units.' Remarkably, they say it's a just a 'waste disposal unit' while showing 'their' units, and in this case flaunting it, to females. My suggestion is...if that's the case then why not COVER UP or shower in the men's room? After all...it's just a WASTE DISPOSAL unit and not sexual. Never mind that many of us believe it's more than that but THESE people believe it...so why do they not give in? It's more than that...proof that some Transgenders must show and tell to make a point, thus being selfish, instead of 'womaning' up and protecting the innocent females, including children, after all they are one of YOU. Disgusting....and selfish.
I shared your opinion Dear ....All seen through the character of living, if there were doubts about his self-confidence when dealing with others, and even if it comes to using the toilet the Women for gays I do not find There are substantial differences for that, because both are dealing with males at the same pace organoleptic that appear on them together, the same method wearing their Cloths as well as the external body of make-up and other things that meet and the ethics of femininity, pls. imagine entry into men's Locker Room which full femininity of Accessories, jewelry and Women clothing and pretty high,,,, will be more disgust,,, that my opinion >>>

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Transgender Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Need massage in jeddah today 19 min Moe 1
News Police arrest city employee in transgender sexu... 20 min Joe Balls 2
News Excited by Trump, gay Republicans struggle with... 29 min TerriB1 244
News Making GOP history, Trump vows to protect LGBTQ... 29 min Synque 8
Shemale looking for bottom in Dammam or Khobar 2 hr TinySam 10
goodlooking filipino offering massage in jeddah (Jul '13) 4 hr imlee 727
meet here gays.(. jeddah) (Feb '10) 4 hr Monsterwilly 14,331
More from around the web