Transgender Student in Women's Locker...

Transgender Student in Women's Locker Room Raises Uproar

There are 352 comments on the KSFO AM 560 story from Nov 4, 2012, titled Transgender Student in Women's Locker Room Raises Uproar. In it, KSFO AM 560 reports that:

The decision to allow a transgender 45-year-old college student who identifies as a woman but has male genitalia to use the women's locker room has raised a fracas among parents and faith-based organizations, who say children as young as 6 years old use the locker room.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KSFO AM 560.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#225 Dec 25, 2012
Maxwell22 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not about blaming anyone it's about common sense which to individuals like this lack.
No, it's a blame game, and "common sense" leads to the confirmation bias you and that George character are displaying. Common sense is rejected by scientific inquiry, so why should any intelligent person consider it a valid method of judgment.

It's about blame. Your children grow up to be whores, and you think it's everyone else's fault. Now you are looking for something else to blame. It's psychology 101.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#226 Dec 25, 2012
George the Great wrote:
<quoted text>
Common sense? What is that? lol. We are all different but sometimes we have to think of others.
The only reason you ever think of others is to attack them.
Super Green Coffee

Artesia, CA

#227 Dec 26, 2012
This might sound a little angry but was in response to what Tracie said and I responded accordingly.
Tracie wrote:
<quoted text>
And Forced Dick Veiwing of Minors Is Called A Pedophile. Get Real Im All For Equality But There are F***ing Boundries
Well because you sound like an angry person, then I will respond accordingly!
And "FORCED" Puss(y)/Vagina/SNATCH viewing isn't ha, Oh I see, so in your view point it is perfectly ok for a child to be exposed to women's vagina's and breasts and whatever else that women have been exposing to them over the years!!?
I'll wager that you also believe that because a child had popped out of the a women's womb that it some how lends itself a right of way for the more matured child who is {now} taking every thing in visually if you will} that is now noticing so many more things than it did when they came through that experience; into an extremely less comforting environment and into what might be considered and extremely hostile one, LOUD NOISES< BRIGHT, BRIGHT LIGHTS, HUGE FACES WITH BIG SCARY EYES< HUGE BUMPS ON THOSE FACES AND GAWD AWFUL BLUE/GREEN COLORING, OMGAWD {WHERE AM IIIIIIIIII ahhhhhhh!!!!!!?}
Now just suppose {hypothetically speaking of course, that after which now the greater ¼ of our nation might be single parents and ¼ of those are bringing their children into the gym environment. To date in 2012 there is just a tad over 315,000,000 million people living here, one quarter of one quarter would bring it to just shy of 20 million people; and each one of those had let us say for the sake of argument a boy and a girl child with them.
Let us also agree that these single parents in this discussion are the female one’s {please keep in mind if the male one’s had done the same, the counts would be twice the figures.
Now out of those figures which now lends it a figure of approximately 20 million boy children and twenty million girl children which has now brought the count up to 40 million little persons with which is/are taking everything in like a sponge from birth to puberty; {once the mother brings them into the locker room} have now been exposed to a woman’s wet hairy or shaved and dripping, either from sweat or “other reasons”, and now mothers complete nudity, OMGawd mommy what are those huge or tiny bumps you have above your belly button and why do they have another big bump on them??
Oh and mommy why do you have hair down there but that other mommy doesn't, and mommy why is there red stuff coming out of that big girls shaggy hole and mommy why is there white stuff coming out of that big girls baby hole, mommy, mommy why do you have real big bumps behind you but that other mommy does not and eeeeeew mommy she has paper still sticking to hers, oh, oh, oh mommy looky that real big mommy has a rope coming out of her honey hole???? Can you hear any of this yet?
So your argument stands that women have been showing and EXHIBITING Pedophilia for years, in your case scenario then we should imprison or seek medical/psychological help for all women that have done so!!!?
Give us all a break and stop with your unexercised, very unbelievable, under educated and bigoted statements!
Sincerely,
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#228 Jan 5, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
English, we speak it in Seattle, matter of fact it's been the primary language in western Washington since I can remember while growing up here. Please learn to at least Google.
Actually, we are talking Olympia or Evergreen State College...but apples and oranges.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#229 Jan 5, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
The only reason you ever think of others is to attack them.
When have I attacked them except to tell them to cover up when in presence of minor children? Again...spelled out in caps...MINOR CHILDREN. You, Kitten, seem to believe that showing male body parts to opposite minor sex is OK. Granted....you have a health issue but you still haven't understood the REASONS why parents would want you to cover up in those situations. You are being selfish and not understanding OTHERS. You are living your life for YOU and not understanding society. YOU are wrong..your labeling those that disagree with you is just wrong...you NEED some serious HELP. Just cover up...what is wrong with that? If you disagree...then YOU are wrong. We are not saying your lifestyle is wrong but your BELIEFS in showing male junk to underage females is WRONG!
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#230 Jan 5, 2013
KITTEN is very disturbed if she, or he, believes, that showing male body parts to underage, 5 to 14 year olds is acceptable. Being transgender, as she or he comes across, should realize that it is WRONG! Kitten needs some serious help. Child abuser anyone? I said it...the girl or guy labeled me as a bible thumper without merit so why not...this chick or guy has some serious issues with exposing him or herself to underage individuals.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#231 Jan 5, 2013
George the Great wrote:
KITTEN is very disturbed if she, or he, believes, that showing male body parts to underage, 5 to 14 year olds is acceptable. Being transgender, as she or he comes across, should realize that it is WRONG! Kitten needs some serious help. Child abuser anyone? I said it...the girl or guy labeled me as a bible thumper without merit so why not...this chick or guy has some serious issues with exposing him or herself to underage individuals.
Funny, you have not problem with female body parts being shown to little boys.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#232 Jan 5, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny, you have not problem with female body parts being shown to little boys.
Who has said that? That's totally not true. I have discussed in length with my wife that she needs to use the family dressing room at the YMCA when she visits with our children.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#233 Jan 5, 2013
George the Great wrote:
<quoted text>
Who has said that? That's totally not true. I have discussed in length with my wife that she needs to use the family dressing room at the YMCA when she visits with our children.
So you are ashamed of being human. Interesting.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#234 Jan 5, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are ashamed of being human. Interesting.
No.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#235 Jan 5, 2013
George the Great wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
Your entire tone when dealing with nudity betrays that you do. The notion of people seeing, or being, nude makes you cringe. You are ashamed of being human, for only one who is ashamed of themselves would not want to see themselves or others like them.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#236 Jan 5, 2013
I have no problem with nudity. My boys, when I take them to the YMCA, change in the mens dressing room.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#237 Jan 6, 2013
George the Great wrote:
I have no problem with nudity. My boys, when I take them to the YMCA, change in the mens dressing room.
So then you're sexist.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#238 Jan 6, 2013
No. But I have to ask how you deduced that from my comments? Are you a pervert in having a need to show the opposite sex your goods? Same ground rules as your comment. Like it or not, society still has some ground rules regarding nudity. I prefer to go by the 'old school' rules and have men dress with men and women dress with women. There is nothing religious about that, regardless how many times you tried to imply. Here's an idea, why don't you conform to society's belief that sexes need to be separated? Would you honestly feel at 'home' undressing in front of someone else of the opposite sex? Before you answer, think about why you need to be in the females locker room. If you don't have a problem then why should you and this famale trapped in a male body need to have access to the ladies locker room? By this alone tells me that you and the transgender community has a problem with sexual orientation and the body.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#239 Jan 6, 2013
n the end, the fact that this transgender individual needed to be in 'this' looker room shoots the theory that nudity is not a problem. This individual felt more comfortable in the ladies room or there wouldn't be a problem. So why, I have to ask, didn't this individual just shower and use the sauna in the male locker room. Sorry...just using your own example. Check mate. It was a problem for her because she felt different...why are innocent children viewed differently. Just cover up...the lady in question thought she needed to be in a different environment...why not respect innocent children's environment as well...unless, you have an issue to solve or just hate children.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#240 Jan 6, 2013
Check mate...if the body wasn't an issue then this lady should be showering or using the sauna with the males...part of her current gender group.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#241 Jan 6, 2013
George the Great wrote:
No. But I have to ask how you deduced that from my comments? Are you a pervert in having a need to show the opposite sex your goods? Same ground rules as your comment. Like it or not, society still has some ground rules regarding nudity. I prefer to go by the 'old school' rules and have men dress with men and women dress with women. There is nothing religious about that, regardless how many times you tried to imply. Here's an idea, why don't you conform to society's belief that sexes need to be separated? Would you honestly feel at 'home' undressing in front of someone else of the opposite sex? Before you answer, think about why you need to be in the females locker room. If you don't have a problem then why should you and this famale trapped in a male body need to have access to the ladies locker room? By this alone tells me that you and the transgender community has a problem with sexual orientation and the body.
Old school? The oldest humans didn't even wear clothes, there was no need for them, sort of why we were able to survive in spite of evolving to become hairless. Until the early 17th century most "bath houses" were co-ed, with adults and children. Many people were still often running about nude, or very lightly dressed, in areas which required no clothing for survival. Many countries still do, actually.

You see, if you want to go "old school" then you kind of missed your target. Gender segregation is actually a very new concept in our species as a whole, and even then it is only common in about half the world. The only countries that exhibit this segregation are those who either deny their own selves, or have serious sexism problems. The US is a bit of both, actually. You men still think you're dominant, you still consider yourselves "alpha" and in charge. The dynamics of gender segregation have shown a lot about the mental state of the US, and it's not good news.
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#242 Jan 6, 2013
Yet if it is OK for underage females to see male junk because it's acceptable then it is OK for that female to dress in a male locker room. She's dressing in the woman's locker room because she identifies herself as a female. Thus, SHE sees the gender issue as being an issue but ignores others that has the same issues that she does. She is being selfish...dressing in the locker room is not the problem but flaunting the male junk, not covering up, is. If she really had an issue with which locker room to use then she should have covered up. Her, and your own, political correctness proves that you are wrong. Just cover up.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#243 Jan 7, 2013
George the Great wrote:
Yet if it is OK for underage females to see male junk because it's acceptable then it is OK for that female to dress in a male locker room. She's dressing in the woman's locker room because she identifies herself as a female. Thus, SHE sees the gender issue as being an issue but ignores others that has the same issues that she does. She is being selfish...dressing in the locker room is not the problem but flaunting the male junk, not covering up, is. If she really had an issue with which locker room to use then she should have covered up. Her, and your own, political correctness proves that you are wrong. Just cover up.
Why are you such a pervert that you think all nudity is sexual?

This is the aspect of your idiocy that's perplexing. Because if you see every bit of nudity as sexual then you should not be allowed to have kids. If you are thinking that kids are having sexual thoughts when they see nudity then you should not have kids. If you are thinking that kids are looking at genitalia when there are some even visible, then you are a serious pervert and a serious pedophile and should be taken off the streets. Because it is your exact mentality that feeds "flashers."
George the Great

Olympia, WA

#244 Jan 7, 2013
Geez, why are you such a pervert where you believe showing male junk in front of minor females is OK? You stated yourself that nudity isn't a problem so why must you and the female in question need to make a point and dress in the women's locker room...again in front of minor children? Why not cover up or use the male locker room? This question hasn't been answered.

It seems that you and your pervert girlfriend, with male junk, has more of an issue than I do. I'm defending the children....you are defending your perversion in showing male junk to females. Equal rights...sure tell that to the underage children.

You, and your friend, must be perverts if you believe that showing male junk is OK to underage females but still believe your 'privacy' is acceptable and underage females need to adjust to "nudity being acceptable' due to your misguided gender is the issues.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Transgender Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Judge allows Oregon resident to be genderless 1 hr discocrisco 3
News 'Reading a book can't turn you gay,' say author... 2 hr Wondering 126
News Transgender People Are Now Oppressed Because 'P... 3 hr TerriB1 1
News NPR raises concerns about firing of Tennessee r... 12 hr Rainbow Kid 1
News Columbus Bans 'Ex-Gay' Therapy To Minors 12 hr Rainbow Kid 4
News Anxiety, Fear Among Oklahoma LGBT Community Aft... Tue Booty games by gays 5
News Law's cost to N.C. tops $3.7B Tue Robin Hood 1
where guys and gays hangout in jeddah (Sep '10) Mar 21 sam 2,313
More from around the web