Why should Australians fear from Musl...

Why should Australians fear from Muslims?

There are 46749 comments on the Scoop story from Dec 23, 2007, titled Why should Australians fear from Muslims?. In it, Scoop reports that:

About 800 people gathered in Camden, NSW and raised their voice against the plan for an Islamic School to be built in the area.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Scoop.

“Peter hole is a pink twatt”

Since: Aug 14

Ranaghat, India

#49255 Aug 17, 2014
moving on wrote:
<quoted text>
I should have known LLOL,LLOL, You are a Hindu slumdog, lowest of the low...slumdogs who worship human sexual organs, elephants, monkeys, cows, LLOL, I bet your mother showered you in cow piss to bless you when you dropped out of her..LLOL
Now the point is how can an idol worshipper comment of a sacred doctrine of a cosmic message, A slum dog like you is not equipped intellectually to deal with the Doctrine of your piss drinking religion let alone the Doctrinal majesty of Islam.
here comes another muderfuker son of fucklah.
litsen you dirty insect came out of your beardy dad's ass
Put your ass up and sing with me
"Fucklaaaaaaah
fuckbarrrallaaaaaaah
laaa dick laa assshollaaaaaa
Ok we are lowest of the low but why you royals scream loud five times a day to call your asshollaaa
assholllaaaaa
go watch your mom.
she might get busy with your asshollaaa
lol i forgot you all are genes of loss/lost mohammed.
moving on

Torrance, CA

#49256 Aug 17, 2014
xxKakaBubuStinksAsUsualxx wrote:
<quoted text> Dear Oh Dear, https://static-secure.guim.co.uk/sys-images/G... have a good look in to there eyes, you dumb piece of Shiite.
Whats the matter pigmuncher... Didn't your mummy bring in the bucks today..You sound a bit edgy.....tell her to insert a few more fruits and vegetables in her vagina to increase per capita fruit and vegetable contributing to the only Industry left in your filthy society..... "THE PORN INDUSTRY" Pride and Joy of pigmunchers...LLOL,LLOL,LLOL,

l
moving on

Torrance, CA

#49258 Aug 17, 2014
Pelethites wrote:
<quoted text>
Who has the http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/father-charged-afte... in there culture , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =-Whs_Iq3YrwXX you heathen.
You stupid pigmunching moron, How about white trash bitches who get pregnant at 12 and 13 years of age? Mostly as a result of incest or rape by male members of your families or so called boyfriends, a very common occurrence in your shameless society, I can forward you a million such reports.

It is far more preferable and acceptable that a girl marries once she starts to ovulate rather than be fuked by pigs like you and your extended family......If I was to choose between these two evils I would surely go for the later.

And just to teach a peasant pigmuncher like you "Child Marriages" is a cultural issue and has nothing to do with Islam...Kapeesh pigmuncher.
Dalit Trolls Bashers

Germany

#49259 Aug 17, 2014
xxKakaBubuStinksAsUsualxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Vomit up your heathen filth you stinking http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =bEXcJcchvWAXX filthy black pig !!! ;-)
Good on you xKakaBubuStinksAsUsualxx for telling the ID stealing CRACKPOTHINDUSTANI HO what you think of it.
Dalit Trolls Bashers

Germany

#49261 Aug 17, 2014
xxKakaBubuStinksAsUsualxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Who you calling slumdog, Slumpig !!! this is your mother http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Yt3PEcYTF8AXX tell her to shave.
Yopu got it wrong xxKakaBubuStinksAsUsualxx that's the ID stealing CRACKPOTHINDUSTANI HO.
Full Monty

Sydney, Australia

#49262 Aug 17, 2014
Dalit Trolls Bashers wrote:
<quoted text>
Yopu got it wrong xxKakaBubuStinksAsUsualxx that's the ID stealing CRACKPOTHINDUSTANI HO.
Rattled your
cage did I .. LOL LOL Lol Lol lol lol
Muq preface

Parramatta, Australia

#49264 Aug 17, 2014
Muq denies the Quran wrote:
Allah via the Quran states this :
• "Arabs determine the meanings of the Quran and the rest of the Muslim umma (nations) follow that.
•The Quran states literally and in translation that Indians, Asians and other non Arabs are not Muslims and can not go Allah's heaven.
•Allah states in the Quran that if Allah wanted to send his message to non Arab nation, Allah will chose a prophet in their 'image' and from their nation who speaks their tongue or language.
India, Asians and other non Arabs do not get a prophet as yet.
•However Allah has promised not to punish those nations who do not receive a prophet. But if the people of these non Arab nations as jizya slaves falsely claim to be Muslim,,, Allah will get angry and reserve severe and harsh treatment.
• Allah says he despises an ineligible non Muslim pretending to be Muslim (ie Muq as example)
Allah has some divine traditions, called sunnatu-allah, that he will never depart from or change (2, 3). One is he sends to every nation its own prophets from its own people. That remains immutable. It is unchangeable & not open to hadeeth or any other interpretation i.e. Allah decides who can and can not be Muslim.
Allah has said in the Quran that Muhammad was sent to the Arabs and Moses to the Jews.
Allah has said via the Quran that he would never send to the Arabs, or any nation, a foreign prophet. Allah will not send to the Arabs an Arab prophet with a foreign book either, because they wouldn’t understand it (see Q.41:44 below).
Allah has said via the Quran that if he ever decided to send a message to any other nation, say Indians or Asians, he must choose an Indian or Asian who speaks the language, to be the prophet in charge of delivering the divine message.
Quran rulings.
----------
Quran 14:4 “And We did not send any messenger except [speaking] in the language of his people to state clearly for them"
Quran 10:47 "And for every nation is a messenger. when their messenger comes, it will be judged between them in justice, they will not be wronged"
In chapter 41, Allah has declares the Arabs reject a non Arabic Quran:
Quran 41:44 “And if We had made it a non-Arabic Qur’an, they would have said,“Why are its verses not explained in detail [in our language]? Is it a foreign [recitation] and an Arab [messenger]?”
His wisdom and rationality of the “Prophet for every Nation” policy is clear.
Muhammad was not a messenger for Indians or Asians, and they in turn are not wanted by Arab Islam.
Allah has said in the Quran that Indians or Asians CAN NEVER RECEIVE redemption from him ; they WILL NEVER enter Allah's heaven.
Allah states again in the Quran this :
"On the judgement day, these prophets will act as witnesses over their nations".
Quran 16:89 “And [mention] the Day when We will resurrect among every nation a witness over them from themselves. And We will bring you,[O Muhammad], as a witness over your nation. And We have sent down to you the Book as clarification for all things …..”
Summary.
Muhammad is a prophet for the Arabs only. No prophet for Indians was sent. No judgement or redemption can be given to an Indian.
An Indian can not pretend to 'Muslim' or have a view on Islam. Allah forbids this.
Indians offend Allah when they pretend to be Muslim or to represent a point of view as a Muslim. Because they can't be Muslim. There is over 15 detailed Sura's that outline this. No one can dispute that the Quran says this. This is the word of Allah.
Muq is not entitled to have views on Islam as Islam says he can not.
Muq needs to preface any comment he makes in future on Islam with the following statement.
" I Muq am a Aljaf (beast with no soul) Indian jizya Slave of Islam. I am not a Muslim and as an Indian the Quran explicitly rules that I can not be a Muslim. Anything I say as Muq does not represent a valid or authentic Muslim point of view".

Since: Sep 13

Europe

#49265 Aug 17, 2014
Muq preface wrote:
<quoted text>
Indians offend Allah when they pretend to be Muslim or to represent a point of view as a Muslim. Because they can't be Muslim. There is over 15 detailed Sura's that outline this. No one can dispute that the Quran says this. This is the word of Allah.
Muq is not entitled to have views on Islam as Islam says he can not.
Muq needs to preface any comment he makes in future on Islam with the following statement.
" I Muq am a Aljaf (beast with no soul) Indian jizya Slave of Islam. I am not a Muslim and as an Indian the Quran explicitly rules that I can not be a Muslim. Anything I say as Muq does not represent a valid or authentic Muslim point of view".
There is no authentic Muslim Point Of View. Just different interpretations.
Tom

Sydney, Australia

#49266 Aug 17, 2014
humhaina wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no authentic Muslim Point Of View. Just different interpretations.
Yes the disunified lot they can't even stop slaughtering their own kind.

Pathetic, what a train wreck their part of the world is.
Dick

Sydney, Australia

#49267 Aug 17, 2014
You racist law breaking hate filled miserable piece of shiite !

http://www.news.com.au/national/abu-bakr-aust...

Bad parents bring up bad children. Absolute scum.
HasbhaRAT Trolls Bashers

Germany

#49270 Aug 17, 2014
Pole Smoker Ratty the HasbhaRAT Dalit BHOJPURI Troll wrote:
Eating from the ass, smoking on the pole, anal rod skewer pipe. Poke me in the butt, sperm me in the gob, smack me with the Dalit love shaft.
What's the point of this post, CRACKPOTHINDUSTANI HO ?

Are you blind, deaf as well being extremely dumb, JackASS:

Post using the identity now assigned to you in the future:

who="Pole Smoker Ratty the HasbhaRAT Dalit BHOJPURI Troll"]
HasbhaRAT Trolls Bashers

Germany

#49272 Aug 17, 2014
Full Monty wrote:
<quoted text> Rattled your http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =jNfItig00ksXX cage did I .. LOL LOL Lol Lol lol lol
Quit posting videos of yourself from you family album, xxKakaBubuStinksAsUsualxx, ID stealing ape.
HasbhaRAT Trolls Bashers

Germany

#49275 Aug 17, 2014
Pole Smoker Ratty the HasbhaRAT Dalit BHOJPURI Troll wrote:
<quoted text>

Ireland

#49271
41 min ago

There are anal rods protruding from my crack pipe.

Germany
#49273
21 min ago

I have set the records for sperm swallowing. After 2 liter I have my stomach pumped.
Does this Fanny SHEMALE Indian Man transqueer PHAGGOT HO Troll have a brain?

What's the point of these posts, CRACKPOTHINDUSTANI HO ?

Are you blind, deaf as well being extremely dumb, JackASS:

Post using the identity now assigned to you in the future:

who="Pole Smoker Ratty the HasbhaRAT Dalit BHOJPURI Troll"

Advice from topix : adapt. improve. succeed.- our advice:

Quit wasting your time and making a total goon of yourself, get off that proxy Fanny, go home:

http://tinyurl.com/p67folw
Jake

Coorparoo, Australia

#49277 Aug 17, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
Of course, in the intervening years, America’s press itself changed, becoming an intensely concentrated corporate industry whose editorial policies are invariably in lock-step over colonial wars and interventions and coups, almost as though it were an unofficial department of government. In addition, this corporatized press has abandoned traditional responsibilities of explaining even modestly world affairs, reportage resources having been slashed by merged corporate interests as well as by new economic pressures on advertising revenue, the result of changing technologies.
There is only one lens in America’s mainline journalistic kit, and that is one that filters everything through corporate American views, an automatic and invariable bias found in every image taken or written outside America’s borders. Now, some will say in response that a few newspapers like The New York Times or The Washington Post are exceptions here, but they couldn’t be more wrong. When a journalistic institution gains a reputation for thoroughness and detail in some of its operations, it becomes all the more able to powerfully leverage its reputation in matters which concern the establishment.
If you examine the record of these newspapers for some decades, you will find absolutely without exception, their close support for every dirty war and intervention, as you will find their close support for the brutal, criminal behaviors of favored American satrapies like Israel. In a number of cases, CIA plants have worked directly for these papers as disinformation pipelines, but in all cases, reportage and editorial reflect nothing beyond what the publicity offices of the Pentagon and CIA would write themselves. It actually is a sign of how distorted American perceptions are that these papers are in any way regarded as independent, disinterested, or demonstrating consistent journalistic integrity.
The American political system at the national level makes these practices practicable. No one is genuinely responsible for anything in an open and direct fashion, secrecy is as much the norm in America as it is in any authoritarian government you care to mention, and money is the only governing principle in American politics. Openness or transparency simply does not exist, as one might expect it would, transparency being one of the hallmarks of responsible and democratic government.
America on there worse day is still way better than any islamic country on there best day.....
Muq false Muslim

Sydney, Australia

#49278 Aug 18, 2014
humhaina wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no authentic Muslim Point Of View. Just different interpretations.
No, Islam is very clearly defined as being of the Quran as the literal word of Allah relayed to his prophet Muhammad and as recalled by his companion and then compiled some 12 years
(after the murder of Muhammad by the Bakri into the Quran. All other versions were burnt).

The author of the Quran Uthman was buried as a Jew like Muhammad, but all Islam regards the Quran as final & immutable.

So if the Quran states Indians can not be Muslim and outlines in many Sura's why and the rules - this is Islam at its purest and unaltered.
It is NOT subject to 'interpretation' or hadeeth -it's Quranic doctrine, binding, unalterable and not open to interpretation.

Islam & Allah have divine traditions, called sunnatu-allah, that Allah will never depart from or change (2, 3).
One is he sends to every nation its own prophets from its own people.
This remains immutable. It is unchangeable & not open to hadeeth or any other interpretation i.e. Allah decides who can and can not be Muslim.

Allah said in the Quran that Muhammad was sent to the Arabs and Moses to the Jews.
Allah said via the Quran that he would never send to the Arabs, or any nation, a foreign prophet.
Allah will not send to the Arabs an Arab prophet with a foreign book either, because they wouldn’t understand it (see Q.41:44 below).

Allah said via the Quran that if he ever decided to send a message to any other nation, say Indians or Asians, he must choose an Indian or Asian who speaks the language, to be the prophet in charge of delivering the divine message.
The word of Allah states this in the Quran and it remains clear and unchanged.

Q. 14:4 “And We did not send any messenger except [speaking] in the language of his people to state clearly for them"

Q.10:47 "And for every nation is a messenger. when their messenger comes, it will be judged between them in justice, they will not be wronged"

In chapter 41, Allah has declares the Arabs reject a non Arabic Quran:

Q.41:44 “And if We had made it a non-Arabic Qur’an, they would have said,“Why are its verses not explained in detail [in our language]? Is it a foreign [recitation] and an Arab [messenger]?”

His wisdom and rationality of the “Prophet for every Nation” policy is clear.

Muhammad was not a messenger for Indians or Asians, and they in turn are not wanted by Arab Islam. Allah has said in the Quran that Indians or Asians CAN NEVER RECEIVE redemption from him ; they WILL NEVER enter Allah's heaven.

Allah states again in the Quran this :
"On the judgement day, these prophets will act as witnesses over their nations".

Q. 16:89 “And [mention] the Day when We will resurrect among every nation a witness over them from themselves. And We will bring you,[O Muhammad], as a witness over your nation. And We have sent down to you the Book as clarification for all things …..”

Summary.
Muhammad is a prophet for the Arabs only. Indians and Asians aren't welcome. No prophet for them was sent. No judgement or redemption can be given to any non Arab Indian or Asian.

Any Indian or Asian that 'pretends' to be Muslim (rather than being just a jizya slave or property of Islam) angers Allah.

Allah states they are mocking him and defying his clear rulings in the Quran. Allah asks "how can an Indian or Asian say they are 'Muslim', when their duty as jizya slave is to read the Quran and know they can never be Muslim?"
Allah is very angry at such people.
He states on judgment day these jizya slave 'fake Muslims' will be set aside, flayed alone, then thrown in a vast pit of fire & brimstone to burn in agony as sinners and false believers for ever.
Allah knows best.
moving on

Miami, FL

#49279 Aug 18, 2014
Bogan white trash convicts are to dumb to understand truthful stuff because their whole lives are a big fat lie? nevertheless this is a great article ........

Did Bush move America’s presidency ‘offshore?’ By Gordon Duff

Rather than allow President Obama to assume a “real” presidential office, sources now tell that “handlers” who, with the help of Vice President Cheney, kept George W. Bush medicated and sober as possible, directed him to facilitate efforts that would guarantee that no subsequent American president would ever be able to enact policies unfavorable to Israel or powerful criminal interests.

Like so many American corporations, even the US presidency is moved “offshore,” considered too important to be left in the hands of elected officials. As American broadcast journalist Mike Harris said today,“So this is why President Obama is playing so much golf.”

This wasn’t the first time an American presidency was considered a threat and this solution,“offshoring,” was deemed an effective way of avoiding other efforts as were looked to in the past.

President Obama has had less power than any American president in history. Nominations are blocked, his decisions are never enacted because of lack of funding and many departments under executive authority simply ignore him. There is a reason for this. The American presidency was relocated,“offshore,” by George W. Bush.

BACKGROUND
In 2000, the GOP and their Israeli allies spent up to $10 billion to win the White House, rigging voting machines, intimidating voters, manipulating counts and running a smear campaign of unprecedented proportions. They still lost. Sources have now come forward that cleaning up the trail of the 2000 coup de etat involved threats against Al Gore and his family and the 2008 murder of GOP “vote hacker,” Mike Connell, just before he faced an Ohio grand jury.

Even after staging 9/11 and in the midst of two contrived wars, John Kerry unofficially won the 2004 election with a 5 million vote majority. Pollsters were clear on one thing; there would never be a fairly elected Republican candidate in the White House. There was only one solution, the presidency had to be destroyed, its power eliminated and moved offshore.

This project was undertaken by the Bush administration, literally “burning down the White House,” leaving the executive branch of the US government powerless on its own, subject to the Supreme Court, now the chief lawmaking branch of government and the similarly crippled legislative branch.

CRIPPLING THE LEGISLATURE
The US held a census in 2000. As is the case, after each census, districts that elect members of the House of Representatives are reapportioned based on population trends. This time was different. With the US Supreme Court totally under control, and Bush in officer after the coup, the House of Representatives was restructured based on what is called “gerrymandering.”

No matter how large a majority Democrats would win an election by, most seats would go to the Republicans. In the 2012 election, Republicans won a substantial majority in the House with only 37 percent of the vote.

WHY THIS MATTERS
Before Bush left office,“line item” rules were established that made any effort to enact executive policy subject to financial oversight and approval by the House. Bush, in agreeing to this, virtually eliminated the Executive branch of government.

Any presidential initiative, let’s say, closing Guantanamo for instance, depends on spending funds. Travel, administrative planning or even moving prisoners requires spending. If funds are spent, even when approved by the president, without the now necessary approval of the House, always a “Republican” house, the president is violating law and subject to impeachment. This is the basis for the current proposed impeachment of President Obama now.
moving on

Miami, FL

#49280 Aug 18, 2014
However, what has been done is to have abrogated all constitutional structure through what had been sabotage of the American government, what in reality is an act of “constitutional terrorism.”

RULES UPON RULES
In order to block Obama from reforming the government, every federal department that would be under his authority, those overseeing veterans affairs, protecting the borders, running the military, overseeing environment or even law enforcement, was totally restructured by the Federalist Society, a group of lawyers closely tied to Zionist extremist elements.

A new class of “civil servant” was created that could only be removed through legislative authority. These “protected individuals” are tasked with directing contracts to “favored” individuals and, if necessary, to sabotage government operations as we have seen with the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement branch. Both simply stopped operating, veterans medical care came to an end and millions of illegal aliens simply walked into America as the bureaucracy overseeing America’s borders simply stopped functioning, went on “stand down.”

Moreover, the legislative organizations themselves set up rules allowing them to block any legislation or political appointment and, in doing so, paralyze the Obama administration that hasn’t been able to appoint ambassadors, judges, prosecutors of regulatory personnel.
All performing those key tasks under Obama are either Bush holdovers or, as with the State Department, neocon puppets like Samantha Power, US Ambassador to the UN or Victoria Nuland, defacto “Queen” of the Ukraine.

PRESIDENTIAL HISTORY
Eisenhower was the last “dependable” American president. No one tried to kill him as with Truman; he quietly disarmed America, fell behind in the space race, watched American cities crumble and was silent on all areas of human rights. Eisenhower was “perfect.”
Kennedy, however, was a problem and was dealt with effectively, murdered within weeks of moving against both Israel’s nuclear arsenal and the Federal Reserve System.

Similarly, Lyndon Johnson was forced to withdraw from the presidency in favor of Nixon. What he did to offend, complicit in the Six Day War and the attack on the USS Liberty, will never be known.

Similarly, Nixon was brought down, resigning to avoid impeachment and prison. Nixon openly hated Jews making his partnership with arch-Zionist Kissinger a case of “strange bedfellows.”

The Carter presidency was destroyed by the Federal Reserve cutting off the money supply and pushing interest rates into the stratosphere. Carter, now considered a “rabid anti-Semite” had to be gotten rid of. Reagan and Bush and the “October surprise” assured that.

Reagan could win but was never intended to serve. 69 days in office he was shot by a Bush family friend.
When, in 1988, a Bush president was finally in office, a war contrived and a major US victory heralded, only 4 years later, Bush came in third in a 3 way presidential race.

Though Clinton was paying off the national debt, unemployment at an all-time low, economic growth at an all-time high, US relations around the world at a crescendo, congress tried to impeach him based on an affair with a young Mossad operative named Monica Lewinsky.
moving on

Miami, FL

#49281 Aug 18, 2014
OBAMA’S CONFUSING STATE OF AFFAIRS
Last week, President Obama cut military aid to Israel, blocking shipments of Hellfire missiles, the primary weapon used against civilians in Gaza by the IDF. Conservative news organization said “Obama has joined Hamas” and that this will likely “give Hamas a commanding position in the war in Israel.”

Only a week before, Obama had sounded like he was totally behind Israel, according to newspaper reports. Now he is considered both a “terrorist” and “traitor” by Republicans and the Israel lobby.

Inexplicably, independent press organs that had been citing connections between ISIS and their reign of terror and the trail of support for that organization that led back to Tel Aviv, began attacking Obama when he ordered bombing raids on this Israeli backed Al Qaeda group.

When Obama uses his position as commander in chief of the military to, what appears to be, strangle Israeli operations, even that is purposefully misconstrued to the point of absurdity. After all, as Thierry Meyssan of Voltaire Net so ably pointed out, it is ISIS that is partnered with the Israeli’s, ARAMCO and the oil companies, why are moves against them being reported by “alternative press” groups as quite the opposite?

GD/NN


Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, a combat infantryman, and Senior Editor at Veterans Today.

“Peter hole is a pink twatt”

Since: Aug 14

Mumbai, India

#49282 Aug 18, 2014
moving on wrote:
OBAMA’S CONFUSING STATE OF AFFAIRS
Last week, President Obama cut military aid to Israel, blocking shipments of Hellfire missiles, the primary weapon used against civilians in Gaza by the IDF. Conservative news organization said “Obama has joined Hamas” and that this will likely “give Hamas a commanding position in the war in Israel.”
Only a week before, Obama had sounded like he was totally behind Israel, according to newspaper reports. Now he is considered both a “terrorist” and “traitor” by Republicans and the Israel lobby.
Inexplicably, independent press organs that had been citing connections between ISIS and their reign of terror and the trail of support for that organization that led back to Tel Aviv, began attacking Obama when he ordered bombing raids on this Israeli backed Al Qaeda group.
When Obama uses his position as commander in chief of the military to, what appears to be, strangle Israeli operations, even that is purposefully misconstrued to the point of absurdity. After all, as Thierry Meyssan of Voltaire Net so ably pointed out, it is ISIS that is partnered with the Israeli’s, ARAMCO and the oil companies, why are moves against them being reported by “alternative press” groups as quite the opposite?
GD/NN
Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, a combat infantryman, and Senior Editor at Veterans Today.
whatever
you are still gene of loss/lost muhammed
fcuk off you illegal son of fuckllah

“Peter hole is a pink twatt”

Since: Aug 14

Mumbai, India

#49283 Aug 18, 2014
moving on wrote:
OBAMA’S CONFUSING STATE OF AFFAIRS
Last week, President Obama cut military aid to Israel, blocking shipments of Hellfire missiles, the primary weapon used against civilians in Gaza by the IDF. Conservative news organization said “Obama has joined Hamas” and that this will likely “give Hamas a commanding position in the war in Israel.”
Only a week before, Obama had sounded like he was totally behind Israel, according to newspaper reports. Now he is considered both a “terrorist” and “traitor” by Republicans and the Israel lobby.
Inexplicably, independent press organs that had been citing connections between ISIS and their reign of terror and the trail of support for that organization that led back to Tel Aviv, began attacking Obama when he ordered bombing raids on this Israeli backed Al Qaeda group.
When Obama uses his position as commander in chief of the military to, what appears to be, strangle Israeli operations, even that is purposefully misconstrued to the point of absurdity. After all, as Thierry Meyssan of Voltaire Net so ably pointed out, it is ISIS that is partnered with the Israeli’s, ARAMCO and the oil companies, why are moves against them being reported by “alternative press” groups as quite the opposite?
GD/NN
Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, a combat infantryman, and Senior Editor at Veterans Today.
Arabs are the most agressive, self-hating racist. They hate everybody including emselves because they lack good manners. They usually dont follow their religionbut claim to be Muslims. Instead they are too jealous and agressive against other races. However Arabs are slaves of White people, espcially America. Arabs will lick American boots and brag because they think they own Islam. Howrver, Islam was established for ghe entired world.

Arabs themselves are dickhead and call every non arabic a "slave"

Arabs are rich ugly thug-like terroists who spend millions of dollars on platic surgery.

Stay away from Arabs. They are very dangerous because they have high testerone with big noses, agressive, stubborn, thick, hairy and are jealous.

If you're Muslim, make friends with non-Arabs because Arabsare generally dumb. Most of them torture their servants and wives. Allah stated in the Quran that Beduions are the worst hypocrits.

You all arabs are son of fucklah

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Terrorism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Gov: Removing Confederate statues like losing 9... 22 hr DonaldMcDumpfHeil... 489
News A look at the family rescued from Taliban-linke... Oct 13 Lucky 1
News End the 'big wink' in US-Middle East foreign po... Oct 7 stalk this 5
News Canada puts pressure on allies to monitor far-r... Oct 4 Charlie 1
News Trump considering more hawkish approach to Iran... Oct 2 GHJ 4
News At Trial, a Focus on the Facts, Not the Politic... Oct 1 St Rick Saintpornum 2
News 'The War Is Not Over' (Sep '06) Sep 29 rider 276,624
More from around the web