Why should Australians fear from Muslims?

Full story: Scoop 44,820
About 800 people gathered in Camden, NSW and raised their voice against the plan for an Islamic School to be built in the area. Full Story
MUQ cant face today

Australia

#41435 Jul 27, 2013
MUQ wrote:
-
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...
U.S. Prosperity Slides in Index
October 30, 2012 !!!! MUQ your such a dill.
With the USA presidential election just a week away,,,, blah blah old stale wrong info....
The Legatum Institute a Dubai front propaganda outfit... Blah blah
MUQ don't bother - this is cut & paste that's nearly one year out of date !!
The USA is on masive rebound - the usa now has more energy and gas resetves than saudi !! Some of the other countries higjlighted have gone backward, ESP the middle east.
You are very out of date and it's off topic.
Why do you waste people's time with such junk?
-
How about some real news.
Cairo today - the egyptian people killed over 100 muslim brotherhood as they continue their purge against the virus of the Islamist fanatics.
Tunis today - thousands out on the street protesting against the Islamist regime who assasinated the opposition leader.
Libya today - crowds of libyans attack and hunt down the muslim brotherhood and hated Islamist's.
That's todays news : all of the middle east is in civil war - of Sunni versus Shia & the salafi recidivists losing control. The Bakri (Sunni ) battle versus the mohommadeans is a war that goes back to 632 ad - when Aisha & Abu Bakr
murdered Muhammad. Islam has been split since. Why don't you comment on this murder by the Bakri ?
Turkey, Iraq, Syria, Tunisa, Algeria, Mali, Morroco, Egypt - and Malaysia and Indonesia - everywhere Islam is in failure and chaos.
All because Muhammad was weak, and Abu Bakri was not, so killed him via Aisha, as well as Uthman & Ali. The battle for control of the pagan gods & idols of islam continues, as these two apostate virulent heresies wage war on each other.
MUQ muhammad murder

Australia

#41436 Jul 27, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
After the first attempt was he guarded and after the second the third what sort of security would have protected him and who would they have answered to ?
There were four attempts to kill muhammad, after he betrayed Abu Bakr and word got out on the recission he had dictated to Ali (see prior for the sequence of events)
The first three attempts were by the Bakri to intercept muhmadad in travels and murder him.
I can dig up all the references.
-
Ali and the Medina tribal group provided protection to Muhammad, at this stage it was a full on war between the Meccan Bakri & medina moderates/remaining ishmaelites.
-
Aisha as outlined had been sent away after being caught having sex with saywan , and Muhammad refused to have her in his house.
He waited over a month (that her period came) before he got 'Allah' to declare she was not really a slut, but by then the damage had been done.
The real issue was no heir, muhammad reverting Abu Bakr's Islam back to jewish ishmaelism and the attempted adoption of a slave son, then the coaching of Ali and Muhammad 'dictating new and treacherous scripts to Ali' that broke the original deal with Abu Bakr.
-
On the last attempt - Ali was lured away on a pretext and Aisha offered thru another wife the promise of reconciliation. The poison was datura and purchased from the east (script and records exist). Muhmmad ate a prepared poisoned food item,(dates are recorded) and got violently sick
and then even more poison was administered as 'medicine'!! Very evil & vengeful these Bakri.
Lots of detail & eyewitness accounts. Muhammad was stricken, hallucinating, ranting, sweating, then relapsing with a 'dry white foam' emitted from his mouth.
Datura is an alkaloid that eventually causes cardiac arrest - Muhammad had always boasted that if he lied then Allah 'would strike him down with a split heart' and that's exactly how he died, of a burst heart - a series of strokes that enfeebled him then a massive stroke.
The Bakri prevented Ali and his tribe from coming near (with violence) and they ransacked and looted all of muhammads documents & scripts to find and conceal his recession to Ali.
After Muhammad died, panic set in as there were many versions of the Quran and already the north, medina and Mecca had separate versions. Uthman (medina)'volunteered' to compile one as each side raced to have their own version of events. Uthman burnt 18 other versions and wrote his own - but Aisha refused to hand over muhammads documents or the recession (as outlined in detail before).
Ali & Aisha had a camel fight. Ali won. Assassins were sent to kill Ali (poisoned sword & Uthman).
-
Will dig up the references to the prior 3 assassination attempts.
This is the shame of islam. Why they are all so neurotic. Even Muhammad didn't believe in the nonsense he confected with Abu Bakr for his idol trade - and was about to deny him - so they
killed him. Fact. Fact on fact in fact.:)

“Free Speeech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Australia

#41437 Jul 27, 2013
MUQ muhammad murder wrote:
<quoted text>
There were four attempts to kill muhammad, after he betrayed Abu Bakr and word got out on the recission he had dictated to Ali (see prior for the sequence of events)
The first three attempts were by the Bakri to intercept muhmadad in travels and murder him.
I can dig up all the references.
-
Ali and the Medina tribal group provided protection to Muhammad, at this stage it was a full on war between the Meccan Bakri & medina moderates/remaining ishmaelites.
-
Aisha as outlined had been sent away after being caught having sex with saywan , and Muhammad refused to have her in his house.
He waited over a month (that her period came) before he got 'Allah' to declare she was not really a slut, but by then the damage had been done.
The real issue was no heir, muhammad reverting Abu Bakr's Islam back to jewish ishmaelism and the attempted adoption of a slave son, then the coaching of Ali and Muhammad 'dictating new and treacherous scripts to Ali' that broke the original deal with Abu Bakr.
-
On the last attempt - Ali was lured away on a pretext and Aisha offered thru another wife the promise of reconciliation. The poison was datura and purchased from the east (script and records exist). Muhmmad ate a prepared poisoned food item,(dates are recorded) and got violently sick
and then even more poison was administered as 'medicine'!! Very evil & vengeful these Bakri.
Lots of detail & eyewitness accounts. Muhammad was stricken, hallucinating, ranting, sweating, then relapsing with a 'dry white foam' emitted from his mouth.
Datura is an alkaloid that eventually causes cardiac arrest - Muhammad had always boasted that if he lied then Allah 'would strike him down with a split heart' and that's exactly how he died, of a burst heart - a series of strokes that enfeebled him then a massive stroke.
The Bakri prevented Ali and his tribe from coming near (with violence) and they ransacked and looted all of muhammads documents & scripts to find and conceal his recession to Ali.
After Muhammad died, panic set in as there were many versions of the Quran and already the north, medina and Mecca had separate versions. Uthman (medina)'volunteered' to compile one as each side raced to have their own version of events. Uthman burnt 18 other versions and wrote his own - but Aisha refused to hand over muhammads documents or the recession (as outlined in detail before).
Ali & Aisha had a camel fight. Ali won. Assassins were sent to kill Ali (poisoned sword & Uthman).
-
Will dig up the references to the prior 3 assassination attempts.
This is the shame of islam. Why they are all so neurotic. Even Muhammad didn't believe in the nonsense he confected with Abu Bakr for his idol trade - and was about to deny him - so they
killed him. Fact. Fact on fact in fact.:)
I thankyou .
Your description of what was written reveals animosity between Muslims there and then prior to the death of Muhammad ,my curiousity asks of what sort of Islam we would see if Ali had inherited .

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#41438 Jul 27, 2013
Otto wrote:
Why do you muslims say islam is the religion of peace ?
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07/25/31553...
Where exactly is this peacefulness you talk of ? Excuse me for my ignorance, I just don't see it, all I see is failed states and lots of killing and misery.
Educate me.
-
Muslims have trouble spelling.
-
It should piece as in pieces are all over the place once the detonation takes place.
-
One piece blows that way and the other piece blows the other way.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#41439 Jul 27, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why whole world is against Iran nukes? They do not wars to end?
-
Not the whole world.
-
Just those that are Military stronger than Iran are against Iran having nukes

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#41440 Jul 27, 2013
"Baron44"
-
Muslims have trouble spelling.
-
It should be piece.
-
As in pieces are all over the place once the detonation takes place.
-
One piece blows that way and the other piece blows the other way.
MUQ Ali as a path

Australia

#41441 Jul 27, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
I thankyou .
Your description of what was written reveals animosity between Muslims there and then prior to the death of Muhammad ,my curiousity asks of what sort of Islam we would see if Ali had inherited .
Good question - what if Ali had not been murdered like Muhammad & Uthman were also, by Aisha & Abu Bakr.
What would islam have been like ?
Ali did rule briefly (after a camel fight with Aisha/Bakri tribe, Ali & the medinites won).
By all accounts he was a weak & vacillating leader - sufist like and emphasizing the spiritually of a heavenly god rather than place, object & ritual worship. Remember at this stage islam was in civil war and Ali was trying to find a middle ground between the explicit pagan rutyalism of the Bakri (sunni) and the Jewish ishmaelite higher spirit man image, non object non place bound vision of muhammad. Judaism is characterized by the exclusivity of their god to believers, and so Ali's islam perhaps was too close and undifferentiated from Judaism - it would have most likely folded back into it as just another bizarre ethnic cult variation with no hallmark or iconic features.
This is still the problem with Shia today / apart from the murder of Ali and that muhammads chosen heir was denied... It's pretty much the same.
So Abu Bakr was spot on in that if you are going to lie - make it a big lie. If you are to have a heresy and wipe out & capture your rivals (the medinites/ishmaelites/jews) via a silly impressionable peon (Muhammad) then make it a big heresy. Tell massive lies, say Mecca was eternal, Abraham went there, the Quran was dictated by an angel in a cave, that there was only one Kaaba, it was eternal, the Sabean Haj was of Allah, Hubal was a spirit too not just a stone idol, the black stone was pieces of Allah's face fallen from heaven, all these 'symbols' represent literalism and tangible proofs (which Abu Bakr also owned) to pagan superstitious ignorant people.
In short : Muhammad was a trained jewish ishmaelite missionary sent to spy on & convert the quareeshi at Mecca. He was weak and succumbed to paganism. Abu Bakr then leveraged Muhammad to combine with the pagan Medina tribes to attack the Jews & moderate ishmaelites to sieze power & control.
Aisha, the pact between Abu Bakr & Muhammad then strayed, perhaps desperate to have a heir, in all likelihood Muhammad at his age with the sex rituals he participated in, and in the middle of a ghonerea plague.. would have been infertile.
Aisha's failure to produce a surviving heir and then the fallout between Muhammad & Abu Bakr meant Muhammad got scared, tried to back out, seek another path, & another heir - he went back to his jewish roots and intellectualize & 'abstract' islam, and disinherit Abu Bakr from what was his.
Ali failed to take it anywhere because he wasn't the right person and lacked the skills & support.
Abu Bakr was easily able to kill off Uthman & Ali and then take islam into a more virulent pagan literal and prescriptive set of lies & falsehoods.
Of course he could not openly scorn or mock Muhammad - because he Abu Bakr had made himself made muhammad a 'messenger'(not a prophet) of Allah..
So like how politicians speak of those before them with faint praise, muhmmmad was written out of the Quran (read it - muhammmad is allowed to say nothing in the first person, a tiny sura at the back) and now the Bakri had won.
All Muslims today - Shia or Sunni prostrate to Abu Bakr's objects, a god of his tribes making, a place of them only, a heaven earth portal that moved to where he wanted it to be. They quote from a Quran that he doctored and structured as he wanted it to be. They believe the myths and evil that he dribbled into muhammads ear as the metaphoric Gabriel.
Abu Bakr ; the father of the Islamic heresy. Muhahammad a weak stooge, murdered.. too weak to resist evil, or to be a victim of it.
Ali ; an unfortunate victim of convience, not up
to the task.
MUQ Ali path

Australia

#41442 Jul 27, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
I thankyou . Your description of what was written reveals animosity between Muslims there and then prior to the death of Muhammad ,my curiousity asks of what sort of Islam we would see if Ali had inherited .
Good question - what if Ali had not been murdered, like Muhammad & Uthman also.
What would islam have been like ?
Ali did rule briefly (after a camel fight with Aisha/Bakri tribe, Ali & the medinites won).
By all accounts he was a weak & vacillating leader - sufist like and emphasizing the spiritually
of a heavenly god rather than place, object & ritual worship. Remember at this stage islam was
in civil war and Ali was trying to find a middle ground between the explicit pagan ritualism of
the Bakri (sunni) and the Jewish ishmaelite mendina higher spirit man image, non object non
place bound vision of muhammad. Judaism is characterized by the exclusivity of their god to believers - so Ali's islam was too close and undifferentiated from Judaism - it would have most likely folded back into it as just another ethnic cult variation with no hallmark or iconic features.
This is still the problem with Shia today / apart from the murder of Ali and that muhammads chosen heir was murdered by the Bakri - they don't really have any compelling argument that Ali would have done a better job.
-
Abu Bakr by contrast was the source of Islam.
He knew that if you lie, make it a big lie.
If you are to have a heresy and wipe out & capture your rivals, make it a huge heresy.
Tell massive lies, Mecca was eternal, Abraham
went there, the Quran dictated by angels, only one Kaaba, hajj was of Allah, Hubal was a spirit not just a stone idol, black stone pieces of Allah's face fallen from heaven..
All of this disneyesque 'symbolism' represented
literalism and tangible proofs (which Abu Bakr also owned) to the pagan superstitious ignorant people of that place & time.
In short : Muhammad, a trained jewish ishmaelite missionary sent to spy on & convert the quareeshi at Mecca was weak and succumbed to paganism. Abu Bakr leveraged Muhammad to
combine the pagan Medina tribes to sieze power & control. Aisha broke the pact between Abu Bakr & Muhammad when she strayed, desperate to have a heir, Muhammad infertile with ghoenerra (in plague at the time/decimating all of arab society in bloodline & inheritance).
Abu & Muhammad fell out, Muhammad tried seek another path, & a slave heir, then Ali as a compromise. Muhammad went back to his jewish roots, tried to intellectualize & 'abstract' islam, and disinherit Abu Bakr from what was his.
-
Ali failed to take that path anywhere - he lacked the skills & support. Abu Bakr was easily able to kill off Uthman & Ali. Abu Bakr then took islam into a more virulent pagan literal and prescriptive
set of lies & falsehoods, objects & rituals.
He could not openly mock Muhammad - because he had made him a 'messenger'(not a prophet) of Allah when Abu replaced Hubal the stone idol with Muhammad the once living & now
conveniently dead idol.. So he made himself equal. Muhammad was written out of the Quran (only a tiny sura at the back in the first person) and the Bakri then said whatever they wanted via a 'companion' in the rest of it.
All Muslims today - Shia or Sunni prostrate to Abu Bakr's objects, his place, the heaven earth portal he moved. They quote a Quran that he whispered, doctored & structured as he wanted.
• Abu Bakr deserves credit for the heresy.
• Muhammad a weak stooge, murdered.
• Ali ; victim of convenience, not up to the task.
Betrandd

Australia

#41443 Jul 27, 2013
MUQ muhammad murder wrote:
<quoted text>
There were four attempts to kill muhammad, after he betrayed Abu Bakr and word got out on the recission he had dictated to Ali (see prior for the sequence of events)
The first three attempts were by the Bakri to intercept muhmadad in travels and murder him.
I can dig up all the references.
-
Ali and the Medina tribal group provided protection to Muhammad, at this stage it was a
full on war between the Meccan Bakri & medina moderates/remaining ishmaelites.
-
Aisha as outlined had been sent away after being
caught having sex with saywan , and Muhammad refused to have her in his house.
He waited over a month (that her period came)
before he got 'Allah' to declare she was not really a slut, but by then the damage had been done.
The real issue was no heir, muhammad reverting
Abu Bakr's Islam back to jewish ishmaelism and the attempted adoption of a slave son, then the
coaching of Ali and Muhammad 'dictating new and treacherous scripts to Ali' that broke the original deal with Abu Bakr.
-
On the last attempt - Ali was lured away on a pretext and Aisha offered thru another wife the
promise of reconciliation. The poison was datura and purchased from the east (script and records exist). Muhmmad ate a prepared poisoned food
item,(dates are recorded) and got violently sick
and then even more poison was administered as 'medicine'!! Very evil & vengeful these Bakri.
Lots of detail & eyewitness accounts. Muhammad was stricken, hallucinating, ranting, sweating,
then relapsing with a 'dry white foam' emitted from his mouth.
Datura is an alkaloid that eventually causes
cardiac arrest - Muhammad had always boasted that if he lied then Allah 'would strike him down
with a split heart' and that's exactly how he died, of a burst heart - a series of strokes that enfeebled him then a massive stroke.
The Bakri prevented Ali and his tribe from coming near (with violence) and they ransacked and looted all of muhammads documents & scripts to find and conceal his recession to Ali.
-
After Muhammad died, panic set in as there were many versions of the Quran and already the north, medina and Mecca had separate versions. Uthman (medina)'volunteered' to
compile one as each side raced to have their own version of events. Uthman burnt 18 other versions and wrote his own - but Aisha refused
to hand over muhammads documents or the recession (as outlined in detail before).
Ali & Aisha had a camel fight. Ali won. Assassins
were sent to kill Ali (poisoned sword & Uthman).
-
Will dig up the references to the prior 3
assassination attempts.
This is the shame of islam. Why they are all so neurotic. Even Muhammad didn't believe in the
nonsense he confected with Abu Bakr for his idol trade - and was about to deny him - so they
killed him. Fact. Fact on fact in fact.:)
The description of his murder here ties in with many other accounts and explains why islam has never progressed. It also explains the final contradictory quotes from Mohammed are that the Bakari Sunni are evil, he was tricked, and to "turn on your heel and walk away" from the corruption and mish mish that Islam had become.
I like the bit where Mohammed boasts that "god will strike him down if he is a liar with a split heart" and so the Bakari killed him that way!
Apt. You may say that Mohammed
'died of a broken heart'.....:)
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#41444 Jul 27, 2013
NT wrote:
01. Where are the rest of the copies ?

02. How did Islam gain control of those provinces that the Quran ‘ were being sent to ?
Ans.

01. Rest of the copies got damaged or lost over past 14 centuries, nothing lasts for ever. But enough copes were made form those six originals, so that their loss was not felt.

And one can verify this claim by looking at Quranic copies from first century of Islam to fifteenth century, finding no difference in any of them.

02. How Muslims conquered those places is not subject of our present discussion. They conquered it by vanishing the “Two Super Powers” of the time at the same time.

Those were wonderful days of rise of Islam and the feat and its permanency was unmatchable by any religion.

Will any one believe that Buddhism actually originated in India? Or that Christianity originated in Palestine?
MonoBrow Fixer

Bankstown, Australia

#41446 Jul 27, 2013
Australian Landowner wrote:
The dominant culture in Oz is the bogan comprised mostly of anglo's, and they have ruined this country. They came here in boats rejected from their own country and have leached off the welfare ever since. Yet they don't like it when others do the same. Due to their laziness this country doesn't produce anything, due to their dumbness this country has to import doctors, engineers, cooks, IT people and toilet cleaners from china and india, due to their racism and ugly culture, nobody good wants to immigrate here except the desperate. All they aspire to is to become tradesman or work in the mines. They look down on anyone who tries to improve themselves with education, and take pride in being stupid. They know nothing about the world, and are only capable of having conversations that don't revolve around sport.
Shut up you Miserable Hate filled Dumb WOP , If its so good in your Filthy Stinking Failed Middle Eastern Slumland

STOP WHINGING AND GO BACK TO WHERE YOU COME FROM.



You Dam Dirty APE !

Your Pathetic,

Q.Who would live in a country you hate, with people you hate.

A. A Dumb Stupid WOG Peasant.
Pete

Adelaide, Australia

#41448 Jul 27, 2013
Right on Mono, the sooner we stop these ungrateful middle eastern immigrants coming to our shores the better. Their are people in the world that would appreciate the generosity of the Australian tax payers. This forum is a perfect example of why immigration from certain parts of the world should be banned. Bring on the election.
Mohammed Pete

Albany Creek, Australia

#41449 Jul 27, 2013
Let them all come here . Read your Koran Pete. Allah is great.
MonoBrow Fixer

Melbourne, Australia

#41451 Jul 27, 2013
Australian Landowner wrote:
<quoted text>
LLOL,LLOL,LLOL, Bogan Booos Arse on fire.........LLOL,LLOL
Who's Arse is on fire WOP ?

http://www.almanar.com.lb/english/adetails.ph...

You Dumb WOG !!
Pete

Melbourne, Australia

#41452 Jul 27, 2013
Mohammed Pete wrote:
Let them all come here . Read your Koran Pete. Allah is great.
I did read it until I found out that Mohammad was a Hairy Old pedophile. http://www.almanar.com.lb/english/adetails.ph... Do 11 year old girls make you hard Wogs. Your Sick.
MUQ more taqiyya

Australia

#41453 Jul 27, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
01. Quranic copies from first century of Islam to fifteenth century have no difference. Blatant lie.
02. Muslims conquered by vanishing the “Two Super Powers” of the time. Blatant lie.
MUQ this is not correct. Everyone knows the jews had a kingdom in that area (red sea) and that Islam is just a virulent apostasy of that. The T'ubah jewish
ishmaelite kingdom and their book is what Muhammad preached before it was corrupted. The Quran is just a variant of that with pagan gods & rituals added in. So the Quran is neither original or consistent. Uthmans Quran is not of Islam btw and it was rewritten many times...
-
But let's get onto your claim that Islam defeated the two super powers of the region. What a liar !
In the red sea the Himyarites who practiced the book of tubah that muhammad preached... Were Jews and Arabs united in the persecution & hatred of Christians & Jesus. At war with the sabeans & pagans, Allah & YHWH/Abraham at war.. That's how corrupt & fake Islam really is.
Around 520ad Yusuf the last king of the Himyarites committed a massacre of Christians & other faiths at Najran. Over twenty thousand were killed by fanatic Arabs in this Jewish synthetic ethnic variant of Judaism(familiar ??).
Justin of byzantine then sent a large force and absolutely destroyed the himyarite kingdom.
Muhammad & Abu Bakr were born into an area in a power vacumn. Abu Bakr added in pagan idols & objects that he owned, leveraged muhammad as a peon to attack these himyarite
Jew ishmaelites on their last legs anyway.
Islam is a weed spawned from the collapse of red sea Judaism.
Much later after the murder of Muhammad. the roman empire was collapsing. Syria & Arabia were abandoned. Islam's first 'conquest' Syria was the governor of Syria deciding to use pagan tribute (jizya) as the roman empire could not fund
or maintain the colony. No arab Islam army or clerics conquered anything, the dark ages, plague and death of civilization had begun and Islam spread in the plague and darkness of
these abandoned places. Islam was now many different Islam's with different qurans. Civil wars followed & Islam was finished, until the mongols (khan II) adopted Islam for non believer tax jizya, AFTER their empire had been conquered.
Today most Muslims (like you MUQ) don't know what they believe or even why.
For example: you seriously believe Allah & hubal (lord of the Kaaba) is YHWH - when the Allah & Sabean cults fought the Jews against exactly that. Even in your own brainwashing & idol worship, you still dont even understand Islam correctly.
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#41454 Jul 27, 2013

-

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

U.S. Prosperity Slides in Index That Ranks Norway No. 1

By Simon Kennedy

.

Hard Work

With President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney tussling for the White House, Legatum said the U.S. economy declined two places from last year to 20th. It found that 89 percent of Americans believe hard work produces results, up from 88 percent last year, and the government’s approval rate dropped to 39 percent from 42 percent.

Plagued by the euro-area debt crisis, 24 out of 33 European nations have witnessed a decline in their economic score since 2009, according to Legatum. On the prosperity scale, Greece recorded the biggest drop in 2012, falling 10 places since 2009 to 49th. Spain held on to 23rd place.

The U.K remained 13th, one place ahead of Germany, and Legatum predicted it will overtake the U.S. by 2014 as it scores well for entrepreneurship and governance. Nevertheless, the status of its economy remains a weakness as it slid five places to 26th on that score and job satisfaction is low.

Asian Scores

In Asia, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan all ranked in the top ten for their economies and the top 20 overall. So-called tiger cub economies Vietnam and Indonesia also rose. Indonesia experienced the largest gain in prosperity of any country since 2009, jumping 26 positions to 63rd.

Switzerland, Norway and Singapore topped the economy sub- index, which measures satisfaction with the economy and expectations for it, the efficiency of the financial sector and foundations for growth. In a gauge of entrepreneurship, Denmark ran ahead of Sweden and Finland for the strength of innovation and access to opportunity.

Switzerland also topped the rankings for best government. It was followed by New Zealand and Denmark in a measure determined by the effectiveness and accountability of lawmakers, the fairness of elections, the participation of people in the political process and rule of law. The highest marks for education went to New Zealand, Australia and Canada.

Luxembourg, the U.S. and Switzerland were graded the best for health treatments and infrastructure as well as preventative care and satisfaction with the service. Iceland, Norway and Finland topped the chart for safety and security; Chad, Congo and Afghanistan ranked the lowest on that index.

Canadians, New Zealanders and Australians enjoy the most freedom and social tolerance, Legatum said. Norway, Denmark and Australia had the highest scores for social capital as monitored by social cohesion and family and community networks.
muhammad was a paedophile

Glebe, Australia

#41455 Jul 28, 2013
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/three-men-assaulted...

Obviously these car jackers are Muslim Lebs, the 9 on 3 description gives it away, Lebs don't fight unless it's these kind of odds. Stop saying "Mediterranean on Middle Eastern" press, start saying "dirty, filthy Muslim Leb dogs".

“Free Speeech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Australia

#41456 Jul 28, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
01. Rest of the copies got damaged or lost over past 14 centuries, nothing lasts for ever. But enough copes were made form those six originals, so that their loss was not felt.
And one can verify this claim by looking at Quranic copies from first century of Islam to fifteenth century, finding no difference in any of them.
02. How Muslims conquered those places is not subject of our present discussion. They conquered it by vanishing the “Two Super Powers” of the time at the same time.
Those were wonderful days of rise of Islam and the feat and its permanency was unmatchable by any religion.
Will any one believe that Buddhism actually originated in India? Or that Christianity originated in Palestine?
You have voiced that copies had been made because the originals had been destroyed or lost !
How could such a thing happen to most sacred words within Islam ?
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#41457 Jul 28, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
You have voiced that copies had been made because the originals had been destroyed or lost !
How could such a thing happen to most sacred words within Islam ?
Are you trying to just engage in endless talks?

What was the use of those Copies? So that every one can make copies from it and check and verify it with originals.

That was done hundreds of thousands of fold and millions memorized it in their hearts.

Those copies were perishable and they perished with time. One still survives in TopKopy Museum in Turkey and I am told that one more copy is available in Tashkent.

Want to make issue of it? You should find two copies of Quran anywhere in the world that are different from each other.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Terrorism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why Obama must revisit Ho Chi Minh's request? 16 min chu chu cuuu con ... 19
Two years after Benghazi, US wants more time to... 1 hr Le Jimbo 69
'The War Is Not Over' (Sep '06) 1 hr Pizza Pie 276,523
Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 shot down over Uk... 2 hr Dimitri100 1,118
Mosque lawsuit's cost to county to rise: Expens... (Feb '14) 7 hr MrNormal 12
ISIS recruiting female jihadis from America's h... 8 hr Asian Guy 4
De Blasio under fire amid new threat from Islam... 21 hr Captain Yesterday 9
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Terrorism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••