Why should Australians fear from Muslims?

Full story: Scoop 46,036
About 800 people gathered in Camden, NSW and raised their voice against the plan for an Islamic School to be built in the area. Full Story
MalbarCACA Controllers

London, UK

#38495 Apr 9, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
Gotcha !
Your ego sold you out.
We said enough GOBBLEDEGOOK.

Immediately post your full details for when our legal team serve subpoenas on you, to include:

Your IDs (Muzzie, MalbarCACA, Topix Paid TROLL or Nibiruan)
Your real full names
Your actual locations and addresses
Your Emails
Your real genuine telephone numbers
Kafir

Malmö, Sweden

#38496 Apr 9, 2013
From a comparison list above.

Peek-a-boo - Can you spot the Serpent hiding? Try again

Mohammed Said Allah hates those who don't accept Islam.
(Qur'an 30:4, 3:32, 22:38)
Jesus Said God loves everyone.
(John 3:16)

mohummed said"I have been commanded to fight
against people till they testify that there
is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad
is the messenger of Allah"
(Muslim 1:33)
Jesus said "He who lives by the sword
will die by the sword."
(Matthew 26:52)

mohummed Stoned women for adultery.
(Muslim 4206)
Jesus said "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."
(John 8:7)

mohummed Permitted stealing from unbelievers.
(Bukhari 44:668, Ibn Ishaq 764)
Jesus said "Thou shalt not steal."
(Matthew 19:18)

mohummed Permitted lying.
(Sahih Muslim 6303, Bukhari 49:857)
Jesus said "Thou shalt not bear false witness."
(Matthew 19:18)

mohummed Owned and traded slaves.
(Sahih Muslim 3901)
Jesus Neither owned nor traded slaves.

mohummed Beheaded 800 Jewish men and boys.
(Sahih Muslim 4390)
Jesus Beheaded no one.

mohummedMurdered those who insulted him.
(Bukhari 56:369, 4:241)
Jesus Preached forgiveness.
(Matthew 18:21-22, 5:38)

mohummed said"If then anyone transgresses
the prohibition against you,
Transgress ye likewise against him"
(Qur'an 2:194)
Jesus said "If someone strikes you on the right
cheek, turn to him the other also."
(Matthew 5:39)

mohummed said Jihad in the way of Allah elevates one's position in Paradise by a hundred fold.
(Muslim 4645)
Jesus said "Blessed are the peacemakers, for
they will be called Sons of God"
(Matthew 5:9)

mohummed Married 13 wives and kept sex slaves.
(Bukhari 5:268, Qur'an 33:50)
Jesus Was celibate.

mohummed Slept with a 9-year-old child.
(Sahih Muslim 3309, Bukhari 58:236)
Jesus Did not have sex with children.

mohummed Ordered the murder of women.
(Ibn Ishaq 819, 995)
Jesus Never harmed a woman.

mohummed said"O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you
and let them find in you hardness."
(Qur'an 9:123)
Jesus said"Blessed are the meek, for
they shall inherit the earth."
(Matthew 5:5)

mohummed Ordered 65 military campaigns
and raids in his last 10 years.
(Ibn Ishaq )
Jesus Ordered no military campaigns, nor
offered any approval of war or violence.

mohummed Killed captives taken in battle.
(Ibn Ishaq 451)
Jesus Never took captives.Never killed anyone.

mohummed Encouraged his men to rape enslaved women.
(Abu Dawood 2150, Qur'an 4:24)
Jesus Never encouraged rape.Never enslaved women.

mohummed Demanded captured slaves and
a fifth of all other loot taken in war.
(Qur'an 8:41)
Jesus"The Son of Man came not
to be served, but to serve."
(Matthew 20:28)

mohummed Was never tortured, but tortured others.
(Muslim 4131, Ibn Ishaq 436, 595, 734, 764)
Jesus Suffered torture, but never tortured anyone.

mohummed said"And fight them until there is no more persecution and religion is only for Allah"
(Qur'an 8:39)
Jesus said "Love your enemies and pray
for those who persecute you"
(Matthew 5:44)

mohummed Blessed the brutal murder of a half-blind man
(al-Tabari 1440)
Jesus Healed a blind man (Mark 8:28)

mohummed Ordered a slave to build the very pulpit
from which he preached Islam.
(Bukhari 47:743)
Jesus Washed his disciples feet.
(John 13:5)

mohummed said What are the Greatest Commandments?
"Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause"
(Muslim 1:149)
Jesus said What are the Greatest Commandments?
"Love God and love thy neighbor as thyself."
(Matthew 22:34-40)

mohummed Died fat and wealthy from what was
taken from others in war or demanded from others in tribute.
Jesus Demanded nothing for himself.
Died without possessions.

mohummed Advocated crucifying others.
(Qur'an 5:33, Muslim 16:4131)
Jesus Was crucified himself.

mohummed According to his followers:
Had others give their lives for him.
(Sahih Muslim 4413)
Jesus According to his followers:
Gave his life for others.
(John 18:11 and elsewhere)
FoxNews

AOL

#38497 Apr 9, 2013
.

**ISRAEL Discoveries PROVE JESUS' RETURN -----

http://youtu.be/JO2gm1pFtrs


.
Serpent

Calgary, Canada

#38498 Apr 9, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
01. What is definition of a Bastard? One who is born out of Wedlock and whose father is not known.
As per statistics of USA, more than half of their new born were born out of wedlock….what is wrong in saying that more than half of all children born in USA are bastards?
And what is true for USA should be true for other European nations, because US is the "most conservative" than the Europeans!!
And increase in population of Sodomites and Lesbians is self evident. We see every year Victory Parades from these people and every year more and more people are seen in these rallies.
So I did not tell any lie in my analysis. I called spade a spade, which you will not like naturally.
03. In west you "boast" of having one wife. But every one has many Sex partners during their lives?
What is great thing in having one wife and ten Girl Friends? It only prompts illicit sexual relations and rise in Bastard Children.
And that is what we see in Western Society, where women body is misused and sold as a commercial item.
You cannot sell anything, from a needle to an Air plane, unless you put a body of naked or semi naked women on its cover.
That is the true status and respect of women in the West. She is a sex symbol and her body is for sale!!
04. West was not "always" leaders in science and technology. Before 1500 CE, they were living in object poverty and were unaware even of the basic human way of living.
Their cities were filthy and dirty and houses dark and smelling.
It is only in past 300 years or so that they have gone up in science and technology and it is only your "empty wish" that they will "always" remain tops.
Rise and fall of nations is a phenomenon that is repeated in human history.
Do not under false assumption that these White people shall be on top of world for ever,
05. In Islam there is no bias for or against whites, or blacks, Arabs or Africans or Asians.
All are welcome to become part of Universal Islamic Brotherhood and share on equal basis.
Your just a Muslim scum bag lier, where are the stats that you say support your statements?
These are all Muslim lies, these are lies that Muslims tell each other to make themselves feel good so they can believe they are better than the westerners because Muslims are disliked by everybody on earth.
You don't know anything about the West MUQ !!

Hahaha, Muslims like the West and the lifestyles of the West so much they will do anything to immigrate to Western countries!!'
Western countries are the MOST advanced countries in the world, everybody wants to immigrate to western countries.
The West are leaders in ALL areas of society, this not only includes science and technology but all areas of sports, arts, theater etc etc.. Muslims are just barbarians and are good at nothing except death and distruction!!

The West will always be the most powerful in the world and will always be the leaders in science and technology!!
Muslims living in Muslim countries will always be just disgusting barbarians carrying out their disgusting behavior of doing such things as marrying nine yr old girl, having four wives etc etc..
Disgusting !!!
Heathen Pig Controller

Brisbane, Australia

#38499 Apr 9, 2013
MalbarCACA Controllers wrote:
<quoted text>
We said enough GOBBLEDEGOOK.
Immediately post your full details for when our legal team serve subpoenas on you, to include:
Your IDs (Muzzie, MalbarCACA, Topix Paid TROLL or Nibiruan)
Your real full names
Your actual locations and addresses
Your Emails
Your real genuine telephone numbers
Shut Up Sty 1 and 2, or no swill for your Mother and Sister Tonight !!

Liam

Brisbane, Australia

#38500 Apr 9, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
You totally missed the point.
When British entered India, it was one of the Richest country in the world.
How come when they left it after a rule of 100 years, it became one of the poorest country of the world?
Who is responsible for the decline? What did British do for the development of India?
Why they did not make effort for its development?
And they did the same to every Muslim country they ruled for any amount of time.
Is it not correct to say that they purposely saw to it that none of these countries is developed and its existing resources are allowed to wither away?
If British had not entered India and did not rule it, and then India declined and went poor, it was none of their fault.
But we see clear connection between India becoming poor and Britain getting rich at the same time.
Muslims did not treat any country they ruled in the similar way.
I really think you have a chip on your shoulder,

Q. Why do you always blame others for your own short falls, Jews British, Americans etc etc

Who's to blame for this

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013...

The same people that cause all the problems for Muslims.....

A. MUSLIMS
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#38501 Apr 9, 2013
Serpent wrote:
<quoted text>
Your just a Muslim scum bag lier, where are the stats that you say support your statements?
These are all Muslim lies, these are lies that Muslims tell each other to make themselves feel good so they can believe they are better than the westerners because Muslims are disliked by everybody on earth.
You don't know anything about the West MUQ !!
Hahaha, Muslims like the West and the lifestyles of the West so much they will do anything to immigrate to Western countries!!'
Western countries are the MOST advanced countries in the world, everybody wants to immigrate to western countries.
The West are leaders in ALL areas of society, this not only includes science and technology but all areas of sports, arts, theater etc etc.. Muslims are just barbarians and are good at nothing except death and distruction!!
The West will always be the most powerful in the world and will always be the leaders in science and technology!!
Muslims living in Muslim countries will always be just disgusting barbarians carrying out their disgusting behavior of doing such things as marrying nine yr old girl, having four wives etc etc..
Disgusting !!!
THANKS for YOUR lies!!
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#38502 Apr 9, 2013


-

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

CIA Lies About Lies
The Iraq War and the Persistent Myth of ‘Intelligence Failure’

By Jeremy R. Hammond (Contd.)

In January 2008, the media was abuzz with the supposed revelation from Saddam’s interrogation confirming that he had “bluffed”. His interrogator, FBI agent George Piro, gave an interview with CBS’s 60 Minutes in which he recalled telling Saddam,“And in June 2000 you gave a speech in which you said Iraq would not disarm until others in the region did.” The 60 Minutes report then inserted the claim,“That June 2000 speech was about weapons of mass destruction.” Piro reinforced that claim when the interviewer asked him why Saddam would put his nation at risk “to maintain this charade” of having WMD, to which Piro replied,“It was very important for him to project that because that was what kept him, in his mind, in power. That capability kept the Iranians away. It kept them from reinvading Iraq.”

The Associated Press reported that Saddam’s interrogation confirmed that he “falsely allowed the world to believe Iraq has weapons of mass destruction”. USA Today claimed that Saddam “said he was bluffing publicly about having weapons of mass destruction because he feared showing weakness to Iran”. The headline in the Christian Science Monitor declared,“Why Saddam Hussein lied about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction”; the London Telegraph proclaimed,“Saddam Hussein ‘lied about WMDs to protect Iraq from Iran’”; and Reuters announced,“FBI: Saddam told us he lied about having nukes to deter Iran”.

But in fact the only lie was the claim that Saddam had lied about having WMD. The simple fact of the matter is that he never once claimed that Iraq had WMD. On the contrary, he repeatedly, consistently, and honestly denied this (the CIA document acknowledges in one place that “what Iraq was saying by the end of 1995 was, for the most part, accurate”).

The entire relevant section from the released FBI summary of the June 11, 2004 interrogation Piro was referring to stated,“SSA Piro then asked Hussein if he wrote his own speeches and they come from the heart, then what was the meaning of his June 2000 speech. Hussein replied this speech was meant to serve a regional and operational purpose.

Regionally, the speech was meant to respond to Iraq’s regional threat. Hussein believed that Iraq could not appear weak to its enemies, especially Iran. Iraq was being threatened by others in the region and must appear able to defend itself. Operationally, Hussein was demonstrating Iraq’s compliance with the United Nations (UN) in its destruction of its Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD).” That was very far from suggesting any kind of confession from Saddam that he had “bluffed” about having WMD.
Andrew

Brisbane, Australia

#38503 Apr 9, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
You totally missed the point.
When British entered India, it was one of the Richest country in the world.
How come when they left it after a rule of 100 years, it became one of the poorest country of the world?
Who is responsible for the decline? What did British do for the development of India?
Why they did not make effort for its development?
And they did the same to every Muslim country they ruled for any amount of time.
Is it not correct to say that they purposely saw to it that none of these countries is developed and its existing resources are allowed to wither away?
If British had not entered India and did not rule it, and then India declined and went poor, it was none of their fault.
But we see clear connection between India becoming poor and Britain getting rich at the same time.
Muslims did not treat any country they ruled in the similar way.
“Our boys were passing the mosque when the prayer leader objected to their playing music on cell phones,” the eyewitness said.

The pastor adds that the young men complied with the demand.

“The young men turned off the music at that moment but switched it on again after covering some distance. The cleric raised a clamor and accused the boys of showing disrespect to Islam,” the pastor said.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/cell-phone-music-s...

You Must Be Joking, People enjoying themselves, Makes People Go Insane ?

What's wrong with you people ?
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#38504 Apr 9, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
Try this, Britain entered India and plundered it's resources for England; Who profited from the time Muslims entered India ,seeing the population never evolved as it did with the British to what we see today ?
You are wrong here, when Muslims entered India , they adopted it as their country and did every thing for its development.

That is why it was knows for it riches and wealth even after 1000 years of Muslim rule.

British entered India not to adopt it, but to exploit it and loot it and use its resources to build their country and not India.

They neglected its development, when it was most needed, they scuttled its industry and its trade and craft....that is why in mere 100 years of their misrule , India became one of the poorest country in the world.

And they did not do that to India alone, they did that to EVERY country they ruled during those centuries.

India could be called an exception, but when we see the history of every nation, there must be some connection.

And see how much India developed in past 65 years, why British did not follow that example?

That is difference when you adopt a country and when you make it your colony
Andrew

Brisbane, Australia

#38505 Apr 9, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
THANKS for YOUR lies!!
Thanks for your LIES.

Clay says that this attack proves the volatile nature of Islamic doctrine.

“The incident once again proves that it is extremist ideology, not the government, which ultimately rules the streets of Pakistan,” Clay said.
MUQ Taqiyya

Australia

#38507 Apr 9, 2013
MUQ - why do you lie ?
On India, or islam or every other topic ?
What compells you to spout such Taqiyya (lies) or Shirk (omission) on literally everything.
The lies are so obvious & invite such a response of proof against these lies, it's almost like you are running a contest of 'lie of the day from MUQ'.
None of this is helping you or Islam.
You have been given the facts to save your soul & be a better person.. but then.. You lie again.
The problem with your Shirk & Taqiyya is that it is also a sin against Islam.
Islam rules that Taqiyya & Shirk is only ever to be used in the defense of islam.
But your lies are usually not necessary, never to the point, and they degrade & embarrass all Muslims & bring shame on Islam.
You do not read or understand the Quran & do not know the history or facts of Islam.
You counter with ignorance & wild false claims, or ignore the obvious to state more lies.
You follow weird & self indulgent views that are not based on evidence & not supported by Islam.
Even Allah will surely punish you most severely.

Since: Apr 13

Ipswich, Australia

#38508 Apr 9, 2013
MUQ wrote:
-
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...
CIA Lies About Lies
The Iraq War and the Persistent Myth of ‘Intelligence Failure’
By Jeremy R. Hammond (Contd.)
In January 2008, the media was abuzz with the supposed revelation from Saddam’s interrogation confirming that he had “bluffed”. His interrogator, FBI agent George Piro, gave an interview with CBS’s 60 Minutes in which he recalled telling Saddam,“And in June 2000 you gave a speech in which you said Iraq would not disarm until others in the region did.” The 60 Minutes report then inserted the claim,“That June 2000 speech was about weapons of mass destruction.” Piro reinforced that claim when the interviewer asked him why Saddam would put his nation at risk “to maintain this charade” of having WMD, to which Piro replied,“It was very important for him to project that because that was what kept him, in his mind, in power. That capability kept the Iranians away. It kept them from reinvading Iraq.”
The Associated Press reported that Saddam’s interrogation confirmed that he “falsely allowed the world to believe Iraq has weapons of mass destruction”. USA Today claimed that Saddam “said he was bluffing publicly about having weapons of mass destruction because he feared showing weakness to Iran”. The headline in the Christian Science Monitor declared,“Why Saddam Hussein lied about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction”; the London Telegraph proclaimed,“Saddam Hussein ‘lied about WMDs to protect Iraq from Iran’”; and Reuters announced,“FBI: Saddam told us he lied about having nukes to deter Iran”.
But in fact the only lie was the claim that Saddam had lied about having WMD. The simple fact of the matter is that he never once claimed that Iraq had WMD. On the contrary, he repeatedly, consistently, and honestly denied this (the CIA document acknowledges in one place that “what Iraq was saying by the end of 1995 was, for the most part, accurate”).
The entire relevant section from the released FBI summary of the June 11, 2004 interrogation Piro was referring to stated,“SSA Piro then asked Hussein if he wrote his own speeches and they come from the heart, then what was the meaning of his June 2000 speech. Hussein replied this speech was meant to serve a regional and operational purpose.
Regionally, the speech was meant to respond to Iraq’s regional threat. Hussein believed that Iraq could not appear weak to its enemies, especially Iran. Iraq was being threatened by others in the region and must appear able to defend itself. Operationally, Hussein was demonstrating Iraq’s compliance with the United Nations (UN) in its destruction of its Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD).” That was very far from suggesting any kind of confession from Saddam that he had “bluffed” about having WMD.
Dispite quoranic versus allowing you to lie when it suits your religion the story you post here shows why your muslim lies only hurts you.

Suddom lied about his WMD`s and what did it bring him ? justification in the worlds eyes to allow the US to take him out .

As Jesus says MUQ..........thao shalt not bare false witness......don't lie, even if mohummed says its ok, it will only come back and hurt you.
Tom

Brisbane, Australia

#38509 Apr 10, 2013
Yes here's some more truth

http://www.christianity.com/11670497/

Stop lying, its pathetic
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#38510 Apr 10, 2013
NRM wrote:
Good post ! Excellent, I learn something every time I come on here.

I checked this out, and yes in 1295 the II Khan did run such a contest & choose Islam as a tax & tribute enslavement for the Mongol empire.

No Indian chose islam, it was forced on them by the Mongols via the mughal Islamic warlords.

The British then liberated the Hindu from islam, and later separated India into Hindu or Muslim quarantine zones, as the Hindus hate & have always hated the Islamic imposters.

All across the Islamic world, people born as such slaves of Allah - from malaysia, indonesia, india, or elsewhere now question the fakeness, idolatry
& lies of islam - and choose not to believe in it.

It's the world's most 'not really followed' religion.
Ans.

I think you suffer from this "sickness" which most people suffer on these threads.

According to your self proclaimed theories, No one Accepts Islam, except by force.

This theory itself is totally wrong, you cannot force people to change religion.

If British saved Indian Hindus from Muslims, how come when the left India, it was amongst the poorest nation of the world?

In their 100 years of Misrule, they destroyed the wealth of India and instead of developing it, made it slide to become poorest nation.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#38511 Apr 10, 2013
Jake Bradock wrote:
<quoted text>
Dispite quoranic versus allowing you to lie when it suits your religion the story you post here shows why your muslim lies only hurts you.
Suddom lied about his WMD`s and what did it bring him ? justification in the worlds eyes to allow the US to take him out .
As Jesus says MUQ..........thao shalt not bare false witness......don't lie, even if mohummed says its ok, it will only come back and hurt you.
There is not a Single Quranic verse, which asks Muslims to lie...and I can quote you many in which Allah asks Muslims to speak truth.

In one such verse Allah says "O you who believe!! Fear Allah and be with those who speak truth"

Our prophet said "Truth leads to piety and piety leads to Paradise, while lies lead to impiety and impiety leads to Hell fire.." (AU KAMA QAL).

Islam never asks its followers to lie, irrespective of the situation and it asks Muslims to fulfill their vows and treaties, irrespective of the situation.

You have very little knowledge about Islam and Quran and sayings of Prophet, and this is not a strange thing to see people posing as "experts on Islam" without having even opened Quran!!
Jules knob

Brisbane, Australia

#38512 Apr 10, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
There is not a Single Quranic verse, which asks Muslims to lie...and I can quote you many in which Allah asks Muslims to speak truth.
In one such verse Allah says "O you who believe!! Fear Allah and be with those who speak truth"
Our prophet said "Truth leads to piety and piety leads to Paradise, while lies lead to impiety and impiety leads to Hell fire.." (AU KAMA QAL).
Islam never asks its followers to lie, irrespective of the situation and it asks Muslims to fulfill their vows and treaties, irrespective of the situation.
You have very little knowledge about Islam and Quran and sayings of Prophet, and this is not a strange thing to see people posing as "experts on Islam" without having even opened Quran!!
Says the king of Taqiyya and Kitman
Waleed

Waterford, Australia

#38513 Apr 10, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
There is not a Single Quranic verse, which asks Muslims to lie...and I can quote you many in which Allah asks Muslims to speak truth.
In one such verse Allah says "O you who believe!! Fear Allah and be with those who speak truth"
Our prophet said "Truth leads to piety and piety leads to Paradise, while lies lead to impiety and impiety leads to Hell fire.." (AU KAMA QAL).
Islam never asks its followers to lie, irrespective of the situation and it asks Muslims to fulfill their vows and treaties, irrespective of the situation.
You have very little knowledge about Islam and Quran and sayings of Prophet, and this is not a strange thing to see people posing as "experts on Islam" without having even opened Quran!!
You are pretending the Quran is the entirety of Islam and ignoring the recorded words of the Prophet, right?
Waleed

Waterford, Australia

#38514 Apr 10, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
There is not a Single Quranic verse, which asks Muslims to lie...
Right.

There are several such verses, not a single one.

Qur'an (16:106)- Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie.

Qur'an (3:28)- This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves."

Qur'an (40:28)- A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must "hide his faith" among those who are not believers.

Qur'an (2:225)- "Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts" The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.

Qur'an (3:54)- "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers." The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means deceit. If Allah is deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same.(See also 8:30 and 10:21)

From the Hadith:
Bukhari (52:269)- "The Prophet said,'War is deceit.'"

Bukhari (49:857)- "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
Bukhari (84:64-65)- Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an "enemy."
Muslim (32:6303)- "...he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them)."

Bukhari (50:369)- Recounts the murder of a poet, Ka'b bin al-Ashraf, at Muhammad's insistence. The men who volunteered for the assassination used dishonesty to gain Ka'b's trust, pretending that they had turned against Muhammad. This drew the victim out of his fortress, whereupon he was brutally slaughtered despite putting up a ferocious struggle for his life.

From http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/011-t...
Waleed

Waterford, Australia

#38515 Apr 10, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
According to your self proclaimed theories, No one Accepts Islam, except by force.
Haven't you read that Allah himself promises to burn and torture people who reject Islam, and save people who bow down to him?

That's what we call a threat, and the use of force.

Unless you are saying that is imaginary.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Terrorism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
We'll murder police, says Real IRA (Apr '11) 13 min Jake 218
Cheney again defends interrogation techniques 42 min pakistani 404
Ukraine Needs New Security Guarantees 4 hr UKRAINE in NATO 19
Without help, Libya could become next Syria, fo... 4 hr pizza pie 2
Obama: We're not at cyber war with North Korea 5 hr barefoot2626 39
For chlamydia infection, prevention is better t... 14 hr Victor 1
U.S. slow to support Iraqi tribes in the fight ... 14 hr John_Schuylkill C... 1
More from around the web