Why should Australians fear from Musl...

Why should Australians fear from Muslims?

There are 46820 comments on the Scoop story from Dec 23, 2007, titled Why should Australians fear from Muslims?. In it, Scoop reports that:

About 800 people gathered in Camden, NSW and raised their voice against the plan for an Islamic School to be built in the area.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Scoop.

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

AUSTRALIAN

#38469 Apr 8, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Muslims did not carry out any money out of India. What they got they spent it on the betterment of India itself.
Even the money which Mahmood of Ghzni took away from India came back to India when Ghzni itself became part of India.
Muslims therefore did not steal any thing from India like Europeans did.
Muslims did much more service to India than what they got from it. they were the one who gave the concept of One nation, One Country and One Ruler.
They united India as one country, which before them was a combination of thousands of small states all fighting with each other.
Muslims have to offer no apology to any one like Europeans who came in the garb of Traders and looted India and took its wealth away from it.
When Muslims take to India it was known for its wealth....and after their 1000 rule, India was still well known for its wealth.
However when Europeans left India after a rule of mere 100 years, it was amongst one of the poorest of the poor third world country!!
This is how we compare Muslim rule in India against Western rule in India?
have you any other mode of comparison?
You cannot compare India before Britain appeared to what India looks today.
You mentioned states ,they were run by their own governments who all kept the wealth of the land for their leaders disposal.
When Britain left India it left a system in place to share the wealth for everyone.
Onslow

Australia

#38470 Apr 8, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
First you return all the money you have stolen from our nations, then we will stop sucking up your money!!
A. A little too close to the bone, I see .
Serpent

Calgary, Canada

#38473 Apr 8, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
And what gives you confidence that West will always be leaders in science?
Already most of scientists in west come from third world countries.
West population is more than half are bastards, and more and more are turning to Sodomy and Lesbians....is that a recipe to become world leaders?
The time for west's domination is about to expire soon, have no doubt about it.
Just where are the facts that say half the west are bastards?? Or turning to Sodomy??
More Muslim lies!! Show us a link to support your statement. If you can't your a discusting filthy scum bag Muslim lier!!

We in the west can only have one wife, not like you discusting pigs where you have four wives. And we don't marry nine year old girls like you discusting Muslims do. Even your Prohet is a pedophile who shags nine year girls!! So discusting !!! What sleezy scum bags!!

The West is the leader in technology and science and will always maintain this position in the world. The West is also the superior power in the world and we will always maintain this position.

The next time you see a Western White man in your country, be prepared to bend over and kiss his white ass in appreciation of him making your life so much better by you using Western technology..
Trucker

Australia

#38474 Apr 8, 2013
Arab/Islamic Nobel Prize Winners
From a pool of 1.4 BILLION Muslims which are 20% of the world's population (2 out of every 10 people)
Muslims have won 7 Noble Prizes
(8 if you include Husain barak Obama)
Literature
1988 - Najib Mahfooz
Peace
1978 - Anwar El-Sadat
1994 - Yasser Arafat *
2003 - Shirin Ebadi
Chemistry
1999 - Ahmed Zewail
Physics
Abdus Salam
* NOTE: Norwegian, Kaare Kristiansen, was a member of the Nobel Committee. He resigned in 1994 to protest the awarding of a Nobel "Peace Prize" to Yasser Arafat, whom he correctly labeled a "terrorist."

Hhhmmm that's what we would expect from idol worshipers and moon god people. No interest in helping anyone but themselves. Parasites on a biblical scale.

The Jews however are people of Abraham, and the one true God YHWH. What would their contribution be from just 12 million people ? Not 1.2 billion like Satans people.?

Jewish Nobel Prize Winners
From a pool of 12 million Jews which are 0.2% of the World's Population (2 out of every 1,000 people), there are 165 Jews listed since 1905 as Noble Prize Winners!!!

Good to remember that Jews make up 0.2 percent of the world population, but 54 percent of the world chess champions, 27 percent of the Nobel physics laureates and 31 percent of the medicine laureates.
Read more in "Tel Aviv Cluster" by David Brooks and Gail Collins talk between columns on the NYT.
Jews make up 2 percent of the U.S. population, but 21 percent of the Ivy League student bodies, 26 percent of the Kennedy Center honorees, 37 percent of the Academy Award-winning directors, 38 percent of those on a recent Business Week list of leading philanthropists, 51 percent of the Pulitzer Prize winners for nonfiction.

Please read the book,“The Golden Age of Jewish Achievement” by Steven L. Pease. It lists some of the explanations people have given for this record of achievement. The Jewish faith encourages a belief in progress and personal accountability. It is learning-based, not rite-based.

Wow! All we see is Muslims with their hands out in every non Muslim country in the world. They produce nothing, contribute nothing and as we continue to take their swords away, will be relegated to beggars and parasites, as it is today and throughout history since the inception of Islam. 165 recorded Jewish Nobel Prize winners and just 7 from 1.2 billion Muslims .
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#38475 Apr 8, 2013
-

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

CIA Lies About Lies
The Iraq War and the Persistent Myth of ‘Intelligence Failure’

By Jeremy R. Hammond (Contd.)

That is to say, there were other sites involved in Iraq’s nuclear weapons program, but this program was ended by 1991. He also pointed out that the work done on enrichment “were only studies.” He noted that Iraq already “had highly enriched uranium from France but it was under the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] safeguards.” Iraq thus had worked on building its own centrifuges to enrich uranium,“but had never reached a point close to testing.”

The CIA document nevertheless states that Kamal’s defection “exposed the previously unknown 1991 crash program to develop nuclear weapons.” The program referred to would have entailed using enriched uranium from Iraq’s French-built reactor and enriching additional uranium obtained from Russia to weapons-grade in order to produce material for a bomb. The remarkable dishonesty of this statement is on full display when one compares it with the fact that, when this “crash program” was brought up in his UNSCOM debriefing, Kamal’s actual response was,“no, not true.”

He acknowledged that “the decision was already there to use French uranium, but they were not ready with centrifuges.” In other words, the “crash program” was nothing more than a hypothetical contingency plan involving a scenario in which Iraq would make a final desperate effort to produce a nuclear weapon by kicking out U.N. and IAEA inspectors and enriching its own uranium to weapons-grade—a capability Iraq did not possess.

With regard to Iraq’s biological weapons programs, Kamal was asked during his debriefing,“[W]ere weapons and agents destroyed?” He answered,“[N]othing remained.” He added that the U.N. inspectors “have [an] important role in Iraq with this. You should not underestimate yourself. You are very effective in Iraq.” The unilateral destruction of WMD, Kamal said,“was done before you came in.” On the issue of chemical weapons, the discussion turned to Iraq’s development of VX nerve agent during the Iran-Iraq war. After the war, Kamal told his U.N. debriefers,“the factory was turned into civilian production.”

He added,“Iran also had mustard and sarin and they used mustard [gas] in small quantities. Some of the chemical components came for the US to Iraq”—that the U.S. supplied precursors for Iraq’s WMD is well known. Kamal continued,“[W]e changed the factory into pesticide production. Part of the establishment started to produce medicine.” He also said,“We gave instructions not to produce chemical weapons…. All chemical weapons were destroyed. I ordered destruction of all chemical weapons. All weapons—biological, chemical, missile, nuclear were destroyed.”(He subsequently clarified,“in the nuclear area, there were no weapons”—he had meant that the nuclear program was dismantled.)

The CIA document repeats the standard refrain that Iraq viewed Iran and Israel as a threat and that this therefore “could explain why Iraq might have continued to give the impression that it was concealing WMD—to instill fear or at least uncertainty in their neighbors”. The propaganda claim that Iraq itself wished to give the impression that it had WMD has been repeated many times over the years. David Kay, who initially headed up the Iraq Survey Group (ISG), the CIA’s effort to find WMD in Iraq following the invasion, in order to explain why the search had turned up nothing, suggested that Saddam had “bluffed” about having WMD in order to deter Iran.

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

AUSTRALIAN

#38476 Apr 8, 2013
MalbarCACA Controllers wrote:
<quoted text>
No brainless MalbarCACA Indomauritian ti pilon Ades Bender coward, yellow belly, piss weak wimp, liar, makeup artiste, supreme falsifier, fraud, denier, scheming lowlife poltroon, gutless lily-livered pansy weakling Dufus Futwit scumbag VERMIN user of other mugs to do their dirty work sock and puppet "non desirable elements on topix" LOSER morons and cretins are acceptable to us.
DESIST IMMEDIATELY FROM ANY FURTHER POSTING.
What did you say, bi-sexual goat rooter ?

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

AUSTRALIAN

#38477 Apr 8, 2013
MalbarCACA Controllers wrote:
<quoted text>
No brainless MalbarCACA Indomauritian ti pilon Ades Bender coward, yellow belly, piss weak wimp, liar, makeup artiste, supreme falsifier, fraud, denier, scheming lowlife poltroon, gutless lily-livered pansy weakling Dufus Futwit scumbag VERMIN user of other mugs to do their dirty work sock and puppet "non desirable elements on topix" LOSER morons and cretins are acceptable to us.
DESIST IMMEDIATELY FROM ANY FURTHER POSTING.
In that case,you should commit Harri Carri real fast
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#38478 Apr 8, 2013
NT wrote:
01. You cannot compare India before Britain appeared to what India looks today.

02. You mentioned states ,they were run by their own governments who all kept the wealth of the land for their leaders disposal.

03. When Britain left India it left a system in place to share the wealth for everyone.
Ans.

01. Why should we not compare India or Britishers with India of today? Why it should be a taboo subject?

02. When Muslim came to India, the land was knows for its wealth and riches. Muslims adopted the country as of their own and took care of it and developed it and increased its wealth.

That is why despite 1000 years of Muslim rule, India was still famous for its wealth and riches and its resources.

03. That is what attracted British and other Europeans to it and they came there in the garb of Traders.

04. But British NEVER adopted India as their own country. They only made it as their colony.

They exploited its resources, took its gold and silver and jewels to their country to develop it.

They used India as a source of cheap labour and abundant natural resources.

They destroyed domestic industry of India and took least care in its development.

They destroyed the Unity of India by increasing hate and divides between Hindus and Muslims, who were living peacefully side by side.

05. By looting its wealth and neglecting its development , in 100 years or so of their rules, when the left India, it was a poor country, with no industry, no factories and no infrastructure.

They made richest country of the world the most destitute and Hindus and Muslims going at each other throats.

Why should we thank Britishers for their "help" to make India a great country?

PS:

And what they did to India, they did exactly the same for other Muslim countries too.

Within a century of British and European Colonial Rule, every country in Asia and Africa became backward, uneducated and dependent on the "aid" of these Rich countries of Europe,

Who should take blame for these Europeans atrocities and neglect and looting of these Rich Nations?
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#38479 Apr 8, 2013
Serpent wrote:
01. Just where are the facts that say half the west are bastards?? Or turning to Sodomy??

02. More Muslim lies!! Show us a link to support your statement. If you can't your a discusting filthy scum bag Muslim lier!!

03. We in the west can only have one wife, not like you discusting pigs where you have four wives. And we don't marry nine year old girls like you discusting Muslims do. Even your Prohet is a pedophile who shags nine year girls!! So discusting !!! What sleezy scum bags!!

04. The West is the leader in technology and science and will always maintain this position in the world. The West is also the superior power in the world and we will always maintain this position.

05. The next time you see a Western White man in your country, be prepared to bend over and kiss his white ass in appreciation of him making your life so much better by you using Western technology..
Ans.

01. What is definition of a Bastard? One who is born out of Wedlock and whose father is not known.

As per statistics of USA, more than half of their new born were born out of wedlock….what is wrong in saying that more than half of all children born in USA are bastards?

And what is true for USA should be true for other European nations, because US is the "most conservative" than the Europeans!!

And increase in population of Sodomites and Lesbians is self evident. We see every year Victory Parades from these people and every year more and more people are seen in these rallies.

So I did not tell any lie in my analysis. I called spade a spade, which you will not like naturally.

03. In west you "boast" of having one wife. But every one has many Sex partners during their lives?

What is great thing in having one wife and ten Girl Friends? It only prompts illicit sexual relations and rise in Bastard Children.

And that is what we see in Western Society, where women body is misused and sold as a commercial item.

You cannot sell anything, from a needle to an Air plane, unless you put a body of naked or semi naked women on its cover.

That is the true status and respect of women in the West. She is a sex symbol and her body is for sale!!

04. West was not "always" leaders in science and technology. Before 1500 CE, they were living in object poverty and were unaware even of the basic human way of living.

Their cities were filthy and dirty and houses dark and smelling.

It is only in past 300 years or so that they have gone up in science and technology and it is only your "empty wish" that they will "always" remain tops.

Rise and fall of nations is a phenomenon that is repeated in human history.

Do not under false assumption that these White people shall be on top of world for ever,

05. In Islam there is no bias for or against whites, or blacks, Arabs or Africans or Asians.

All are welcome to become part of Universal Islamic Brotherhood and share on equal basis.
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#38480 Apr 9, 2013
Trucker wrote:
01. God spoke to Noah, Abraham, David, Jesus, Joseph, Moses, and lots of Jews and Christians. God has never spoken to any Muslim ever in history ?

02. God sent a messenger? God was too busy to speak to Mohammed ? Maybe God playing golf that day? Islam, a religion of man with no connection to YHWH !

03. Muslim invent Ibrahim , Hagar, Ishmael ? They built alter and pretended was Abraham ? So Christians and Jews have no interest in fake alter !

04. Yet every moment of Abrahams life has been recorded by Jews and included in Old Testament by Christians !

05. Nothing about Kaaba ? Nothing about Mecca ?

06. Because Jews and Christians have no interest in renovated Hindu Temple which Muslims worship idols of Hindus, black rocks and alters to another God they call Allah. If Kaaba and Mecca were relevant to Jews and Christians , they would be represented in those places ? Instead they view them as a place of godless pagan rock idol worship and keep away from such evil.
Ans.

Your post in the most unreasonable that one can see in recent posts. It is like a Frog living in a well. For him the whole world is his well. For him there is no world outside that well, there is no water except the water in his well.

I would have avoided answering this post, but I think I would puncture your bubble, so that people might not get mislead.

01. Have you a "Personal Guarantee from God" that He will not speak to any one else, except for those mentioned in Bible?

What prevents God from speaking to other people and Nations? Are they not created by God?

According to Quran, God spoke to every nation and every people and sent His Prophets and Messengers to all people in all ages.

This is much more reasonable and logical than your blanket statement.

02. Seeing that Allah, YHWH and God are one and same, your comment seems very childish.

03. Muslims invent Ibrahim, Hagar and Ishmael? Are these names not mentioned in your Bible itself?

04. So you think few lines in Bible cover each and every deed done by Abraham in his 120 years of earthly life? How idiotic and self serving is your claim.

Like the Frog in the well I mentioned earlier.

05. If Bible does not have the name Kaaba (while actually it does mention Makkah), it would not negate its existence. It only shows shortcoming of Bible , nothing else.

If Bible did not mention USA, would it cease to exist as a nation?

06. If Jews and Christians have no interest in the "Oldest House" constructed for the worship of True God of Universe,….it is their own loss.

If you close your eyes and pretend that there is no Sun, it is your stupidity and your loss, no harm shall come to Sun, because your eyes are closed.

Kaaba shall be center for Universal Brotherhood, Jerusalem can never take its place and it was NEVER a center for Universal Gathering of all Nations.

So Jews and Christians are following a racist religion and only have "inferiority complex" about Islam.

MUQ Mughal residue

Australia

#38481 Apr 9, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
02. When Muslim came to India, the land was knows for its wealth and riches. Muslims adopted and Hindus and Muslims living peacefully side by side.
MUQ, what crap.
We know you don't get an education in India but the fact below on India's history are easily checked.
Around the 10th century islam was finished. The Qarmations had destroyed Mecca & the black stone putting an end to the idol worship & heresy. Islam lingered as a faint & ridiculous belief system contained to pagan moon god idol & miracle worshipping Arabs.
In the 13th century the Mongols invaded Europe from the steppes, completely conquering & isolating India & the east indies.
The Mongols had a vast empire - around 3/4 of the known world at the time, but no tribute
collection mechanism.
The Mongols ran a competition to choose an empire religion for 'rules', tax or tribute & organization - similiar to what the romans did in
the 4th/5th century.
The 3 competing relgions were Christianity, Zorarastorism & Islam.
This was just after ghengis khan etc when the new Mongol empire was settling in to defend it's new boundaries from Austria to Java.
Islam was chosen by the Mongols because it allowed Taqiyya, Shirk (relgious based deliberate lies & deception) & the jizya or unbeliever tax -
where all non islams could be punished and taxed if they did not follow the Mongols edicts.
As the Mongol empire was primarily based on
unbelievers, islam offered the best economic model for the new Mongol empire.
From Iran (Persia) to Indonesia, a quisling elite was chosen to run & manage the Mongol empire & in India these were the moghuls.
The moghuls plus their quisling or treacherous converted musselmen (Muslim converts) preyed on the indian Hindu like a rats eating from the guts of a dying person in the gutter.
The Muslims of India as the quisling treacherous body guard of the mughal (Mongol) elite - were
trained to hate & despise the Hindu.
For over 500 years the Mughal empires within India preyed on the Hindu as slaves and treated them as sub human. India was set back hundreds of years as a slave colony run by a small mughal elite armed & protected by the Muslim fanatic musselmen.
The british then conquered the Mughals, but retained the Muslim musselmen as protectors of them as well. But every Hindu would say that the British liberated the Hindu from the Muslim Mughals. No Arab with desert sand between his toes ever stepped into India Quran in hand to convert Hindu to Muslim. Families of traitors to India were either born Muslim , or you paid the jizya (non believer tax) to them in fear of death.
This is across all of India & south Asia, an islamic empire of fear & death, poverty & religious division.
Today - the vast majority of Muslims come from this accident of history. No Indian or Malay or Bengali would ever want to be a muslim if they knew the real reason as to being a subjugated non Arab quisling slave for tribute collection to Mongols WHO NEVER BELIEVED IN ANY Allah except for the money it collected for them.
That's the history of Mughal India - a slave colony using people like your forebears to prey & steal from India.
This is why the Hindu hate & despise the Muslims so much.
They haven't forgotten....
Onslow

Ipswich, Australia

#38482 Apr 9, 2013
MalbarCACA Controllers wrote:
<quoted text>
No brainless MalbarCACA Indomauritian ti pilon Ades Bender coward, yellow belly, piss weak wimp, liar, makeup artiste, supreme falsifier, fraud, denier, scheming lowlife poltroon, gutless lily-livered pansy weakling Dufus Futwit scumbag VERMIN user of other mugs to do their dirty work sock and puppet "non desirable elements on topix" LOSER morons and cretins are acceptable to us.
DESIST IMMEDIATELY FROM ANY FURTHER POSTING.
SHUT UP STY NUMBER 1 !!!
Onslow

Ipswich, Australia

#38483 Apr 9, 2013
MUQ wrote:
-
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...
CIA Lies About Lies
The Iraq War and the Persistent Myth of ‘Intelligence Failure’
By Jeremy R. Hammond (Contd.)
That is to say, there were other sites involved in Iraq’s nuclear weapons program, but this program was ended by 1991. He also pointed out that the work done on enrichment “were only studies.” He noted that Iraq already “had highly enriched uranium from France but it was under the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] safeguards.” Iraq thus had worked on building its own centrifuges to enrich uranium,“but had never reached a point close to testing.”
The CIA document nevertheless states that Kamal’s defection “exposed the previously unknown 1991 crash program to develop nuclear weapons.” The program referred to would have entailed using enriched uranium from Iraq’s French-built reactor and enriching additional uranium obtained from Russia to weapons-grade in order to produce material for a bomb. The remarkable dishonesty of this statement is on full display when one compares it with the fact that, when this “crash program” was brought up in his UNSCOM debriefing, Kamal’s actual response was,“no, not true.”
He acknowledged that “the decision was already there to use French uranium, but they were not ready with centrifuges.” In other words, the “crash program” was nothing more than a hypothetical contingency plan involving a scenario in which Iraq would make a final desperate effort to produce a nuclear weapon by kicking out U.N. and IAEA inspectors and enriching its own uranium to weapons-grade—a capability Iraq did not possess.
With regard to Iraq’s biological weapons programs, Kamal was asked during his debriefing,“[W]ere weapons and agents destroyed?” He answered,“[N]othing remained.” He added that the U.N. inspectors “have [an] important role in Iraq with this. You should not underestimate yourself. You are very effective in Iraq.” The unilateral destruction of WMD, Kamal said,“was done before you came in.” On the issue of chemical weapons, the discussion turned to Iraq’s development of VX nerve agent during the Iran-Iraq war. After the war, Kamal told his U.N. debriefers,“the factory was turned into civilian production.”
He added,“Iran also had mustard and sarin and they used mustard [gas] in small quantities. Some of the chemical components came for the US to Iraq”—that the U.S. supplied precursors for Iraq’s WMD is well known. Kamal continued,“[W]e changed the factory into pesticide production. Part of the establishment started to produce medicine.” He also said,“We gave instructions not to produce chemical weapons…. All chemical weapons were destroyed. I ordered destruction of all chemical weapons. All weapons—biological, chemical, missile, nuclear were destroyed.”(He subsequently clarified,“in the nuclear area, there were no weapons”—he had meant that the nuclear program was dismantled.)
The CIA document repeats the standard refrain that Iraq viewed Iran and Israel as a threat and that this therefore “could explain why Iraq might have continued to give the impression that it was concealing WMD—to instill fear or at least uncertainty in their neighbors”. The propaganda claim that Iraq itself wished to give the impression that it had WMD has been repeated many times over the years. David Kay, who initially headed up the Iraq Survey Group (ISG), the CIA’s effort to find WMD in Iraq following the invasion, in order to explain why the search had turned up nothing, suggested that Saddam had “bluffed” about having WMD in order to deter Iran.
Don't concern yourself with that,

Look what the Muslims are doing to their Muslim brothers.

Shocking

http://bostonglobe.com/news/world/2013/04/08/...

What kind of people are you ?

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

AUSTRALIAN

#38484 Apr 9, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
01. Why should we not compare India or Britishers with India of today? Why it should be a taboo subject?
02. When Muslim came to India, the land was knows for its wealth and riches. Muslims adopted the country as of their own and took care of it and developed it and increased its wealth.
That is why despite 1000 years of Muslim rule, India was still famous for its wealth and riches and its resources.
03. That is what attracted British and other Europeans to it and they came there in the garb of Traders.
04. But British NEVER adopted India as their own country. They only made it as their colony.
They exploited its resources, took its gold and silver and jewels to their country to develop it.
They used India as a source of cheap labour and abundant natural resources.
They destroyed domestic industry of India and took least care in its development.
They destroyed the Unity of India by increasing hate and divides between Hindus and Muslims, who were living peacefully side by side.
05. By looting its wealth and neglecting its development , in 100 years or so of their rules, when the left India, it was a poor country, with no industry, no factories and no infrastructure.
They made richest country of the world the most destitute and Hindus and Muslims going at each other throats.
Why should we thank Britishers for their "help" to make India a great country?
PS:
And what they did to India, they did exactly the same for other Muslim countries too.
Within a century of British and European Colonial Rule, every country in Asia and Africa became backward, uneducated and dependent on the "aid" of these Rich countries of Europe,
Who should take blame for these Europeans atrocities and neglect and looting of these Rich Nations?
The British and European nations entered Indian society pretty much the same as Muslims and now the natives are getting restless and no want their culture and who they are ,to be in competition with another race of peoples who have invaded them
MalbarCACA Controllers

UK

#38485 Apr 9, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
DELETED
No brainless MalbarCACA Indomauritian ti pilon Ades Bender coward, yellow belly, piss weak wimp, liar, makeup artiste, supreme falsifier, fraud, denier, scheming lowlife poltroon, gutless lily-livered pansy weakling Dufus Futwit scumbag VERMIN user of other mugs to do their dirty work sock and puppet "non desirable elements on topix" LOSER morons and cretins are acceptable to us.

DESIST IMMEDIATELY FROM ANY FURTHER POSTING.
MalbarCACA Controllers

UK

#38486 Apr 9, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
In that case,you should commit Harri Carri real fast

What did you say, bi-sexual goat rooter ?
We said:

No Ades Bender sock and puppet "non desirable elements on topix" are acceptable to us.

Idiotic MUMBO JUMBO, STU PIDEASS Muzzie Monkey gibberish, Bender gobbledegook WILL NOT BE TOLERATED.

DESIST IMMEDIATELY FROM ANY FURTHER POSTING.
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#38487 Apr 9, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
The British and European nations entered Indian society pretty much the same as Muslims and now the natives are getting restless and no want their culture and who they are ,to be in competition with another race of peoples who have invaded them
You totally missed the point.

When British entered India, it was one of the Richest country in the world.

How come when they left it after a rule of 100 years, it became one of the poorest country of the world?

Who is responsible for the decline? What did British do for the development of India?

Why they did not make effort for its development?

And they did the same to every Muslim country they ruled for any amount of time.

Is it not correct to say that they purposely saw to it that none of these countries is developed and its existing resources are allowed to wither away?

If British had not entered India and did not rule it, and then India declined and went poor, it was none of their fault.

But we see clear connection between India becoming poor and Britain getting rich at the same time.

Muslims did not treat any country they ruled in the similar way.
Not really Muslims

Australia

#38488 Apr 9, 2013
MUQ Mughal residue wrote:
<quoted text>
MUQ, what crap.
We know you don't get an education in India but the fact below on India's history are easily checked.
Around the 10th century islam was finished. The Qarmations had destroyed Mecca & the black stone putting an end to the idol worship & heresy. Islam lingered as a faint & ridiculous
belief system contained to pagan moon god idol & miracle worshipping Arabs.
In the 13th century the Mongols invaded Europe
from the steppes, completely conquering & isolating India & the east indies.
The Mongols had a vast empire - around 3/4 of
the known world at the time, but no tribute
collection mechanism.
The Mongols ran a competition to choose an empire religion for 'rules', tax or tribute & organization - similiar to what the romans did in
the 4th/5th century.
The 3 competing relgions were Christianity, Zorarastorism & Islam.
This was just after ghengis khan etc when the
new Mongol empire was settling in to defend it's new boundaries from Austria to Java.
Islam was chosen by the Mongols because it allowed Taqiyya, Shirk (relgious based deliberate
lies & deception) & the jizya or unbeliever tax -
where all non islams could be punished and taxed if they did not follow the Mongols edicts.
As the Mongol empire was primarily based on
unbelievers, islam offered the best economic model for the new Mongol empire.

From Iran (Persia) to Indonesia, a quisling elite was chosen to run & manage the Mongol empire & in India these were the moghuls.

The moghuls plus their quisling or treacherous
converted musselmen (Muslim converts) preyed on the indian Hindu like a rats eating from the guts of a dying person in the gutter.

The Muslims of India as the quisling treacherous body guard of the mughal (Mongol) elite - were
trained to hate & despise the Hindu.

For over 500 years the Mughal empires within India preyed on the Hindu as slaves and treated
them as sub human. India was set back hundreds of years as a slave colony run by a small mughal elite armed & protected by the
Muslim fanatic musselmen.

The british then conquered the Mughals, but retained the Muslim musselmen as protectors of
them as well.
But every Hindu would say that the British liberated the Hindu from the Muslim Mughals.
No Arab with desert sand between his toes ever
stepped into India, Quran in hand to convert Hindu to Muslim. Families of traitors to India were either born Muslim , or you paid the jizya (non
believer tax) to them in fear of death.

This is across all of India & south Asia, an islamic empire of fear & death, poverty &
religious division.

Today - the vast majority of Muslims come from this accident of history.
No Indian or Malay or Bengali would ever want to
be a muslim if they knew the real reason as to being a subjugated non Arab quisling slave for tribute collection to Mongols - WHO NEVER
BELIEVED IN ANY Allah except for the money it collected for them.

That's the history of Mughal India - a slave
colony using people like your forebears to prey & steal from India.

This is why the Hindu hate & despise the Muslims so much.
They haven't forgotten....
Good post ! Excellent, I learn something every time I come on here.
I checked this out, and yes in 1295 the II Khan did run such a contest & choose Islam as a tax & tribute enslavement for the Mongol empire.
No Indian chose islam, it was forced on them by the Mongols via the mughal Islamic warlords.
The British then liberated the Hindu from islam, and later seperated India into Hindu or Muslim quarantine zones, as the Hindus hate & have always hated the Islamic imposters.
All across the Islamic world, people born as such slaves of Allah - from malaysia, indonesia, india, or elsewhere now question the fakeness, idolatry
& lies of islam - and choose not to believe in it.
It's the world's most 'not really followed' relgion.

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

AUSTRALIAN

#38489 Apr 9, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
You totally missed the point.
When British entered India, it was one of the Richest country in the world.
How come when they left it after a rule of 100 years, it became one of the poorest country of the world?
Who is responsible for the decline? What did British do for the development of India?
Why they did not make effort for its development?
And they did the same to every Muslim country they ruled for any amount of time.
Is it not correct to say that they purposely saw to it that none of these countries is developed and its existing resources are allowed to wither away?
If British had not entered India and did not rule it, and then India declined and went poor, it was none of their fault.
But we see clear connection between India becoming poor and Britain getting rich at the same time.
Muslims did not treat any country they ruled in the similar way.
Try this, Britain entered India and plundered it's resources for England; Who profited from the time Muslims entered India ,seeing the population never evolved as it did with the British to what we see today ?
MalbarCACA Controllers

UK

#38490 Apr 9, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
Try this, Britain entered India and plundered it's resources for England; Who profited from the time Muslims entered India ,seeing the population never evolved as it did with the British to what we see today ?
Never mind your GOBBLEDEGOOK

Immediately post your full details for when our legal team serve subpoenas on you, to include:

Your IDs (Muzzie, MalbarCACA, Topix Paid TROLL or Nibiruan)
Your real full names
Your actual locations and addresses
Your Emails
Your real genuine telephone numbers

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Terrorism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Obama expands ISIL fight into Syria; Canada won... (Sep '14) Thu Gerbert 14
News How Obama Is Vindicating Bush (Jan '09) Wed Boring 398
News George Galloway: leaked papers reveal Canada's ... (Apr '10) May 25 George vs USA Senate 5
News Fight for ISIS, lose your citizenship, says Aus... May 24 Grassclipper 4
News Shiite Cleric Calls Maliki Visit to U.S. a Betr... (Jul '06) May 24 Swedenforever 3
News IS and the IRA - a comparison May 23 Lawrence James co... 3
News ABC, CBS Continue to Omit Criticism of Obama as... May 23 USA Today 1
More from around the web