You cannot compare India before Britain appeared to what India looks today.<quoted text>
Muslims did not carry out any money out of India. What they got they spent it on the betterment of India itself.
Even the money which Mahmood of Ghzni took away from India came back to India when Ghzni itself became part of India.
Muslims therefore did not steal any thing from India like Europeans did.
Muslims did much more service to India than what they got from it. they were the one who gave the concept of One nation, One Country and One Ruler.
They united India as one country, which before them was a combination of thousands of small states all fighting with each other.
Muslims have to offer no apology to any one like Europeans who came in the garb of Traders and looted India and took its wealth away from it.
When Muslims take to India it was known for its wealth....and after their 1000 rule, India was still well known for its wealth.
However when Europeans left India after a rule of mere 100 years, it was amongst one of the poorest of the poor third world country!!
This is how we compare Muslim rule in India against Western rule in India?
have you any other mode of comparison?
You mentioned states ,they were run by their own governments who all kept the wealth of the land for their leaders disposal.
When Britain left India it left a system in place to share the wealth for everyone.