You totally missed the point.<quoted text>
The British and European nations entered Indian society pretty much the same as Muslims and now the natives are getting restless and no want their culture and who they are ,to be in competition with another race of peoples who have invaded them
When British entered India, it was one of the Richest country in the world.
How come when they left it after a rule of 100 years, it became one of the poorest country of the world?
Who is responsible for the decline? What did British do for the development of India?
Why they did not make effort for its development?
And they did the same to every Muslim country they ruled for any amount of time.
Is it not correct to say that they purposely saw to it that none of these countries is developed and its existing resources are allowed to wither away?
If British had not entered India and did not rule it, and then India declined and went poor, it was none of their fault.
But we see clear connection between India becoming poor and Britain getting rich at the same time.
Muslims did not treat any country they ruled in the similar way.