MUQ you make too many statements here and seek to impose your views on others.<quoted text>
Why they shit on Quran when they have their own Vedas, Gitas, Ramayanas, Mahabharata, Manu Smiritis and hundreds of other books?
Then Christians would be able to extend their Bibles for shitting purpose...because that is the only use for Bible in western world, Bible has ceased to be a book that had any force in any of the western country,
When they have done all that, then they dare
look at Quran and then they will realize that they have exhausted all their shit and have shitted in their pants and dhoties and what else they wear in the lower parts of their bodies.
Very emotional and illogical views without any foundation.
After all the bible is never claimed as a miracle or as old as eternity itself. It vibrantly offers different opinions and conflicts and allows each reader to gain context as insight and metaphors - rather than say rote prescriptive illogical and false rules.
There is no secret the bible has gone thru many reinterpretions, evolutions, updates, reformations, and yet despite all that the essence of the message is still pretty good and universal.
Now the Quran, only read by a few, understood by even less as a political or ideological manifesto, is from the same rootstock, Judaism.
The Ishmaelites were doing ok until muhammad made a mess of it. He introduced absolutism, blocked evolution, got a lot wrong (fair enough as his jewish coaches never anticipated he would go rougue and replace Yahweh with Hubal/Allah and synthesis in pagan rituals & polytheism.
So if the bible is toilet paper to use, we can handle that.
But the Quran is used toliet paper, the very words and structure and integrity of the Quran is mediocre to awful. Anyone with a basic knowledge of the ishmaelite myth could have written a better branch and fable.
Anyone could have structured the Quran into a format that allowed extension, incorporation and evolution. Even the mostly tactical writer of an ideology for a society embracing monotheism (well paganised variant of it) would allow clear
Even the Quran format is silly with it's long to short sura's rather than chronological orders and subject groupings. Many sura's conflict, clash or leave massive gaps assuming the Quran can only be used in conjunction with the old testament as the writers were lazy and wrote it as an extension rather than a complete book.
It reads as a mad, scrambled, contradictory footnote on some one else's 'book' ie a large chunk of the bible - rather than as a complete standalone work. Indeed the Quran extensively refers to the old testament and the bible as a basis for the quran's own validity !
So no Islam can smear the bible without smearing the Quran and the beliefs of muhhammad who used and quoted and extended the bible in promoting his own view and beliefs..
In fact MUQ to do so is shirk and thats a very big sin in Islam as you know.
Allah would say you fully understand this sin and thus he will reserve the most severe punishment for you. The Quran tells you that also.
By the way. The haj is a Vedic ritual. You said I believe you have done the haj. You enjoyed paying homage to some probably false black
stone remnants in 7 x circumlocution wearing a
cotton white shift whilst circulating and pointing to or touching and kissing a sacred object.
All Indian Vedic, Sabian added the moon god.
The Vedic souls of your forebears would be stirred that despite your illogical beliefs you actually practiced an ancient Indian ritual exactly the same as they once did.
So I wouldn't be putting down their beliefs too much either given what you believe and practice came from them also.